Fwd: [DC] WSIS+20 Elements Paper - DCCG submission

[Amali De Silva - Mitchell]

Please send comments back to this email list. 

We will then forward comments back as a DC

Thanks Amali

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Markus Kummer <kummer...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Jul 4, 2025, 12:12 a.m.
Subject: [DC] WSIS+20 Elements Paper - DCCG submission
To: dc <d...@intgovforum.org>

Dear all,

Please find below a first draft for a common submission of the DCCG as a reaction to the WSIS+20 Elements paper. We can discuss this more in detail at our call next week. AS you will note, the draft mentions that iDCs may make individual submissions in their respective area of expertise. While the common submission will reflect a consensus position, the individual DC submission will not reflect a consensus.

This is a reminder to take a close look at the Elements Paper and prepare a reaction in your area of expertise. You may wish to refer to individual paras of the paper that you find problematic or point our areas that are missing. However, please keep your submissions as short as possible, not exceeding a one pager.

Best regards
Markus


_______________________________________________
DC mailing list
D...@intgovforum.org
To unsubscribe or manage your options please go to http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/dc_intgovforum.org

[Amali De Silva - Mitchell]

Markus

Pleass could you provide the annex as well which lists our contributions ? We could add to this if relevant. 

Thanks Amali

DC DDHT

[Amali De Silva - Mitchell]

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Markus Kummer <kummer...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Jul 9, 2025, 7:42 a.m.
Subject: Re: [DC] WSIS+20 Elements Paper - DCCG submission
To: dc <d...@intgovforum.org>

Here is the revised version, reflecting our discussion during the call.

Markus

> On 9 Jul 2025, at 15:14, Markus Kummer <kummer...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>

> Please find attached a slightly update draft for our common position as a reaction to the WSIS+20 Eelements paper. It takes on board  Muhammad’s suggestion to put the narrative in the first person plural and Torsten’s suggestion to add a line that the renewal of the IGF mandate. The first draft stated that the submissions of the DCs “do not reflect a consensus position”, Muhammad suggested it into “may not”. I took this on board but changed it into “do not necessarily reflect” a consensus position.
>
> To be discussed at our call.
>
> Best regards
> Markus
>
> <WSIS+20-DCCG submission.9.7.2025.docx>

>
>> On 4 Jul 2025, at 09:01, Markus Kummer <kummer...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Please find below a first draft for a common submission of the DCCG as a reaction to the WSIS+20 Elements paper. We can discuss this more in detail at our call next week. AS you will note, the draft mentions that iDCs may make individual submissions in their respective area of expertise. While the common submission will reflect a consensus position, the individual DC submission will not reflect a consensus.
>>
>> This is a reminder to take a close look at the Elements Paper and prepare a reaction in your area of expertise. You may wish to refer to individual paras of the paper that you find problematic or point our areas that are missing. However, please keep your submissions as short as possible, not exceeding a one pager.
>>
>> Best regards
>> Markus
>>
>>

>> <WSIS+20-DCCG submission.docx>