On behalf of the Co-facilitators, we acknowledge receipt of the IGF Dynamic Coalition on Data Driven Health Technologies’ inputs to the Zero Draft. Thank you very much for your valuable contribution to the WSIS+20 process and we will do our best that these are reflected in the next revisions.
Best regards,
UN DESA WSIS+20 Secretariat
From: Amali De Silva-Mitchell
Msg cut
Sent: Tuesday, 30 September, 2025 4:02 PM
To: ungawsisreview <ungawsi...@un.org>
Cc: Jörn Erbguth <jo...@erbguth.net>; joseamad...@gmail.com
Subject: Submission for WSIS 20+ Zero Draft from IGF Dynamic Coalition on Data Driven Health Technologies
|
|
Dear UNGA WSIS 20 + Review Committee
Re: WSIS +20 Zero Draft
As there is an open invitation to contribute to the review, I am taking this opportunity to write this short note to the committee. I am the Founder and Chair of the Dynamic Coalition on Data Driven Health Technologies at the United Nations Internet Governance
Forum.
The Dynamic Coalition is a space where everyone can gather to talk., to share, to capacity build, to gain feedback, to learn, to test out a process, develop guidance and guidelines, propose solutions and so forth, for patient centered ehealth.
It is a great space for all stakeholders, including represenatives of countries, to engage with the global public, with no commitments. It is a space for innovation and active, timely discussions on subjects such as ethics and cultural diversity for human /
patient rights..
We have been active at both the annual WSIS conferences and the IGF annual meetings, as well as at Eurodig, over the past several years. We have members and participants from at least 25 different countries, representing all continents and stakeholder groups.
Many more international people join our events.
The DC is an opportunity like no other, to engage and talk about emerging issues, prepare for the future and risk mitigate while keeping a human rights, people centered orientation, to all matters discussed.
I just want to emphasize, that like our DC, we have a family of DCs at IGF and they play an invaluable role for a people centered internet. With AI and Quantum discussions, we can keep up the pace, all year through at IGF rather than meet fir discussions just
once a year! It is an open forum, hence open to the international public, like no other space!
Kind regards and best wishes,
Ms Amali De Silva-Mitchell
Chair IGF DC DDHT
Cc: Vice Chairs DC DDHT: Dr J. Erbguth and Dr A, Espinosa
On behalf of the Co-facilitators, we acknowledge receipt of the IGF Dynamic Coalition on Data Driven Health Technologies’ inputs to the Zero Draft. Thank you very much for your valuable contribution to the WSIS+20 process and we will do our best that these are reflected in the next revisions.
Best regards,
UN DESA WSIS+20 Secretariat
From: Amali De Silva-Mitchell
Msg cut
Sent: Tuesday, 30 September, 2025 4:02 PM
To: ungawsisreview <ungawsi...@un.org>
Cc: Jörn Erbguth <jo...@erbguth.net>; joseamad...@gmail.com
Subject: Submission for WSIS 20+ Zero Draft from IGF Dynamic Coalition on Data Driven Health Technologies
|
|
Dear UNGA WSIS 20 + Review Committee
Re: WSIS +20 Zero Draft
As there is an open invitation to contribute to the review, I am taking this opportunity to write this short note to the committee. I am the Founder and Chair of the Dynamic Coalition on Data Driven Health Technologies at the United Nations Internet Governance
Forum.
The Dynamic Coalition is a space where everyone can gather to talk., to share, to capacity build, to gain feedback, to learn, to test out a process, develop guidance and guidelines, propose solutions and so forth, for patient centered ehealth.
It is a great space for all stakeholders, including represenatives of countries, to engage with the global public, with no commitments. It is a space for innovation and active, timely discussions on subjects such as ethics and cultural diversity for human /
patient rights..
We have been active at both the annual WSIS conferences and the IGF annual meetings, as well as at Eurodig, over the past several years. We have members and participants from at least 25 different countries, representing all continents and stakeholder groups.
Many more international people join our events.
The DC is an opportunity like no other, to engage and talk about emerging issues, prepare for the future and risk mitigate while keeping a human rights, people centered orientation, to all matters discussed.
I just want to emphasize, that like our DC, we have a family of DCs at IGF and they play an invaluable role for a people centered internet. With AI and Quantum discussions, we can keep up the pace, all year through at IGF rather than meet for discussions just
once a year! It is an open forum, hence open to the international public, like no other space!
Dear Amali
What do you mean by “individual memberships for the DCs”?
If it is individual membership in each DC, I believe that this is already the case, and that is not going to change. Besides, this is the matter of each individual DC, not the DCCG.
If OTOH you mean that individuals could join the DC as individuals, not as part of a coalition, I would need some more explanation on what you think exactly..
Cheers,Roberto
_______________________________________________
DC mailing list
D...@intgovforum.org
To unsubscribe or manage your options please go to http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/dc_intgovforum.org
Hi,
I am confused, again
Are we talking about:
1 individuals being able to join any DC?
2 individuals not affiliated with any DC, being able to join the DCCG?
3 yet another proposition?
Thanks
Happy festive gap
AvriOn December 24, 2025 11:00:34 PM EST, Judith Hellerstein <jud...@jhellerstein.com> wrote:Hi AmaliRetired people can already participate and can join any DC they want. There are no restrictions. They can also participate in any of the policy networks and best practice forumBestJudithSent from my iPhoneMobile and What’s app: +12023336517On Dec 24, 2025, at 7:58 PM, Amali De Silva - Mitchell <gphli...@gmail.com> wrote:
Avri Doria
Technicalities
HI Roberto,
I agree with you. I also think that the rules of DC says that membership should be open to all unless a person has violated the code of conduct. We had some people who have violated these rules. Also, all mailing lists are open
So, I am not really understanding the issue here. If anyone can join a DC, then what is the issue. It seems the only issue is for people who are not interested in any of the topics covered by any of the 32 DCs, and if that is the case than why are they interested in joining a DC at all. Or, as Roberto says, they could create their own DC if they have a topic not being covered. But if this is not the issue, than I seem to be missing something here.
Judith
_________________________________________________________________________ Judith Hellerstein, Founder & CEO Hellerstein & Associates 3001 Veazey Terrace NW, Washington DC 20008 Phone: (202) 362-5139 Skype ID: judithhellerstein Mobile/Whats app: +1202-333-6517 E-mail: Jud...@jhellerstein.com Website: www.jhellerstein.com Linked In: www.linkedin.com/in/jhellerstein/ Opening Telecom & Technology Opportunities WorldwideOn 12/27/25 6:33 PM, Roberto Gaetano wrote:
Just to make sure that I am not misunderstood.
I did indeed say that every DC has its rule for membership, and I assume - but I am not sure that this is always the case - that these rules do not restrict membership as long as members are interested in the main topic that is the “raison d’être” od the DC.
So what is left out is the case of individuals who are not interested in any of the topics that are in the scope of any DC.
In this case, there are two possibilities to join the DC community: one is to create a DC that addresses the area that is left out from the current scenario, the other one is to create a “catch-all” DC that has as members all individuals that are not members of a DC.
Either case would need somebody who has the time and energy to draft some “constitutional” papers, i.e. rules for joining, internal functioning, possibly a web site, and all that jazz. Personally, I believe that nobody is willing to invest this time and energy unless there is a real topic of interest - in which case we just follow the normal rules applied so far. To build a “none-of-the-above” DC is, IMHO, a waste of time and energy. However, if Amali - or anybody else - is willing to do it, why not?
Cheers,Roberto
PS: IMHO, this has nothing to do with “risk management of the internet”, but if somebody has a use case to show that confutes my hypothesis, I will be glad to stand corrected
PPS: recalling my former life - about half a century ago - of researcher in abstract algebra and group theory, I can mimic the Russell’s Paradox trying to define the DC that has as members all the individuals who are *not* members of a DC 🤪