Is Pid Same As Serial Number
Vittoria Pretlow
After using the reposition tool in the browse screen to give your cards lower numbers, Tools>Check Database will get Anki to notice which number it should start new cards from. If your problems persist after that, please follow the steps on When problems occur - Frequently Asked Questions
This is driving me crazy. What am I doing wrong? I am trying to do something like this and keep getting this error. I'm trying to do this.
modesHeader=['Mode1','Mode2','Mode3','Mode4']
modesHeaderEco=['Mode1','Mode2']
modesEco=
for mode in traits['sdm.devices.traits.ThermostatEco']['availableModes']:
modesEco.append(mode)
modes=
for mode in traits['sdm.devices.traits.ThermostatMode']['availableModes']:
modes.append(mode)
print len(modes),len(modesHeader)
print len(modesEco),len(modesHeaderEco)
modeEcoDataset=system.dataset.toDataSet(modesHeaderEco,modesEco)
modeDataset=system.dataset.toDataSet(modesHeader,modes)
And I keep getting the error. So for a sanity check I did this and got the same error.
headers=['thing','thing2']
items=['toby','steak']
dataset=system.dataset.toDataSet(headers,items)
You don't provide any printouts to go with your code, so it is not entirely clear what your traits dictionary is yielding. Anyways, the key is that system.dataset.toDataSet(headers, rows) needs headers to be a list of strings that will become your column names, and rows must be a list of lists, where the outer list represents rows, and in the inner lists are the column values for each row. Those inner lists must be the same length as headers.
I am looking for a way to merge contacts with the same phone number and different emails. For context, we get many resubmissions where the person submits with the same phone number, but different email, creating two separate contacts which makes it much tougher on the salesforce side due to a duplication rule we have. I am looking for a way to merge the email to the existing contacts in Hubspot that come in with the same phone number so I don't have multiple leads that are the same person. If anyone knows of a workflow or workaround, let me know!
Hi @MaxGPT,
Were you able to resolve the issue with the Operations Hub and custom code?
We released Koalify to make data deduplication in HubSpot easy.
I ran into the same issue a couple of times wrote a quick how to:
How to merge HubSpot contacts with same (mobile) phone number.
We do have the Operations Hub, but I do not know how to custom code and I couldn't find examples of someone doing this. Also, we have a pretty large database so Insycle would be pretty expensive and we do not need all the features it provides.
No they don't; train has 562 predictor columns and 1 decision column, so valid must have 562 columns (and corresponding decision must be passed to ytest argument).
So the invocation should look like:
However, this is a dirty hack which will fail for more complex formulae and thus it shouldn't be used (even the authors tried to prohibit it, as Joran pointed out in comments). The correct, easier and faster way is to use separate objects for predictors and decisions instead of formulae, like this:
Maybe it is not a bug. When you use dim(), you got different number. It means that training data and valid data do have different dims. I have encountered such problem. My solution is as following: First, I use names() show the variables in the training data and in valid data. I see they do have different variables; Second, I use setdiff() to "subtract" the surplus variables (if the training data has more variables than the valid data, then subtract the surplus variables in training data,vice versa.) After that, training data and valid data have the same variables. You can use randomForest.
Duplicating pads in a footprint is not pin stacking Pin stacking is a symbol trick to have one connection point connect to multiple differently numbered footprint pads. This trick is named this way because one really stacks pins on top of each other with all but one pin set to invisible. Pin stacking is therefore the workaround for the missing feature of being able to assigning multiple pads to a single symbol pin.
Also, please provide a link to the datasheet for this specific connector. Every manufacturer seems to make their connectors slightly differently so w/o the datasheet any advice we give are just guesses.
Take a look at the IRF7404 in the official kicad library (v5.1.6) the stack the pins exactly as you want them for a P-MOSFET, if not for anything else, it can serve for inspiration for what you want to do.
Option 2 have the footprint with pad numbers G, D and S (why use numbers if you already make a special footprint) and a symbol with the same pin numbers (will of course result in a fully atomic setup where one symbol is for exactly one footprint and vice versa).
Option 3 have the footprint with pad numbers 1 to 8 again and also have all pins in the symbol but instead of placing them next to each other place them on top of each other with some of them being made invisible (this is pin stacking).
In duplicating artboards in Illustrator in Windows 10. Select Alt and drag to create a new artboard NO problem. My artboards go from 25, 27, 27, 28. I cannot get a 26. I have created a new artboard at the end and even tried to move it between 25 and 27 to create a 26 and Illustrator will not do it. I still get two 27 artboards. SO the secondary 27 will not export. I have to create one at the end and rename it. I've done this for years, WHAT is going on??? It's a glitch and how do I fix it?
Are you able to reproduce it from the scratch? If yes, please provide the detailed steps. Also, if it is reproducible in any particular file then please share that file so that we can try to reproduce it at our end as well.
We do these series of slides every quarter. We open the last years quarter and update them. The artboards are usually in the same position just with that quarters modifications - color change, quarter and year change, graphs change etc. They were fine until the first update of illustrator on 10/31 hence the original post. Yesterday 11/2 an additional update for Illustrator came through. Since then the duplicate numbers have seemed to go away. They seem to be back the way they were before.
Not sure it was a Halloween thing - a "gremlin" - or the first update didn't like the older files - or just what. The numbers were as you see them - the same number 27. So it wasn't anything I typed in myself.
My co-worker and I have this issue every few days. We often work on projects with many artboards (i.e. donor walls) for export and it has led to some major issues. Restarting is not a valid solution.
Been having this issue for years. The screenshot attached are examples all from a single file I am working in right now. Close and reopen the file and the duplicates stay there, but if my coworker does the same on his computer they don't show. Makes no sense. If I try to export it ignores the second artboard of the same number and that art doesn't get exported.
Please note that resetting preferences will remove all the custom settings and Illustrator will launch with default settings. You can also take a backup of the folders in case you want to. Location is mentioned in the article.
I believe it's only happening when you create a copy (alt + drag) of an artboard. And even then, it only happens sometimes. I am having this issue as well and can't figure out how to fix it.
I have the latest version on Windows 10 installed.
I try to run reference based motion correction but the job stopped at the beginning with error: All movies must have the same number of frames.
I run the job with default settings, the inputs are the volume from non-uniform refinement and the output from Patch CTF job. The dataset is a single dataset.
@martinpacesa and @matt1
Thanks for sharing. My datasets were collected on Krios with K3 detector and 60 frames/movie. We use Latitude S for data collection, and our facility has an internal setup to convert raw files (.gtg) to .tif files.
I found my problem can also be solved by running an import movie job without skip header check. This helps me to identify the bad movies. I manually removed those movies, then everything ran successfully.
@matt1 Just a check, are all the movies that provide your particles included in your inputs? I have a job that keeps crashing so decided to split my movies into subsets to see if I can get at least some of my particles to extract. However, my job crashed with the frame error (and obviously the number of frames is correct). It might be worth doing a count of your files and see if it matches with the number of exposures
Is there a way sort of work backwards, taking the full particle stack and separate the particles according to their acquisition sessions (or Import Jobs), such that maybe I can narrow down the culprit and/or motion-correct at least some of the particles?
Alternatively, as suggested above by @martinpacesa , can the Job be modified such that rogue frame counts are simply ignored? Would be a shame to not be able to apply Reference-based MotionCorr after such a long haul.
to a Manually Curate Exposures job and, inside the job and without modifying any selection criteria, push the Done button. The Particles Accepted output should contain particles derived from that single session only.
Every time I try to give them separate numbers all 3 of the parts balloons change at the same time and i can't seem to figure out why. I never linked them and can't see why or how they could be linked. The parts are saved under different names and each is an individual part.
Hi! I can think of a few logical reason to the behavior. 1) The parts have the same part number. 2) The parts belong to an inseparable subassembly. 3) The parts belong to a subassembly and the partslist and the balloons are based from the structured BOM view.
93ddb68554