Request to add author affiliation to meet the requirements for Ph.D. degree application
林萌
Dear Editors,
I am writing to earnestly request an addition to my author affiliation in my paper, as it is crucial for the timely completion of my Ph.D. program.
Originally, my authorship only included the Institute of Information Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, which is my Ph.D. training institution. However, the Ph.D. degree is awarded by the higher institution, the University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. According to the requirements for applying for a Ph.D. degree at the University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, effective scientific research results that are part of the degree application must be attributed to the "School of Cyber Security, University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences". Without this affiliation, my application for the degree will not be accepted.
Due to my oversight, this has resulted in my paper not being counted as part of my Ph.D. thesis work. I earnestly request your help in adding the author affiliation to my paper. I would be extremely grateful for your assistance in this matter.
Yours sincerely,
Meng Lin
-----原始邮件-----
发件人:"IEEE ISPA 2023" <ieeeispa2...@edas.info>
发送时间:2023-10-18 17:39:56 (星期三)
收件人: "Meng Lin" <lin...@iie.ac.cn>, "Qinghao Huang" <huangq...@iie.ac.cn>, "Tao Guo" <guo...@iie.ac.cn>
抄送:
主题: [IEEE ISPA 2023] Your paper #1570954042 ('Adaptive Fusion of Single-stream and Dual-stream Models based on Cross-modal Association Strength for Harmful Meme Detection')
Authors: Meng Lin, Qinghao Huang and Tao Guo
Dear Mrs. Meng Lin:
Congratulations! On behalf of the Technical Program Committee, we are pleased to inform you that your paper #1570954042 entitled "Adaptive Fusion of Single-stream and Dual-stream Models based on Cross-modal Association Strength for Harmful Meme Detection" has been accepted as a SHORT PAPER for presentation at the IEEE ISPA 2023 held in a hybrid way, on 21-24 December, 2023, Wuhan, China, and for publication in its proceedings.
Please revise your paper carefully to address the reviewers’ comments and suggestions, and to ensure that your final paper fits the camera-ready format. The camera-ready paper is not uploaded on the EDAS system. The camera-ready paper format requirement and upload link can be found at the conference website (http://www.ieee-hust-ncc.org/2023/ISPA/), please follow IEEE conference paper format to prepare your final version. In addition, please pay attention: the camera ready paper upload deadline is 31 October. Do not miss it.
The reviews are below or can be found at 1570954042.
ALL accepted papers must have at least one author registration. ALL accepted short papers must prepare a poster by an author either onsite or virtually, or a substitute person subject to the approval by the Program Chair.
The camera-ready short paper must not exceed 6 pages in IEEE Computer Society appendices. The POSTER, REGISTRATION and CAMERA-READY SUBMISSION guidance will be available on the conference website: http://www.ieee-hust-ncc.org/2023/ISPA/. Please keep an eye on it.
Congratulations again for having your paper accepted by IEEE ISPA 2023. We look forward to seeing you in December, Wuhan, China.
Regards,
Program Chairs of ISPA 2023
ISPA-2023 1
Advance: How would you evaluate the relevance of this paper to the conference, considering its scope and goals?
Good (3)
Technical Contribution: How would you evaluate the technical contribution of this paper?
Good (3)
Originality/Novelty: How orginal are the concepts presented in this paper?
Good (3)
Quality of Presentation: How about the quality of presentation of this paper?
Very Good (4)
Comments: Please present your comments for this paper
The paper presents an approach for hate detection of memes, based on the combination of the two most widely used paradigms.
The paper starts with the introduction where authors clearly explain the rationale behind the proposed approach. Next, authors present related work. They then present the proposed approach and evaluate its quality.
The paper is well-written and the explanation of the proposed approach is clear. The experiments are quite extensive (two datasets, comparison with other models, ablation studies, case study). I do not have major comments.
Detailed comments follow.
- I would suggest to conclude the introduction by explaining how the remainder of the paper is organized.
- Related work is well. I would suggest adding a table for further summarization.
- I appreciated the experiments. They investigate the model in depth and are also well written.
Minor comments follow.
- There are some typos, for instance “implement settings” instead of “implementation settings”.
Overall Recommendation: What is your overall recommendation of this paper?
Accepted (4)
ISPA-2023 2
Advance: How would you evaluate the relevance of this paper to the conference, considering its scope and goals?
Very good (4)
Technical Contribution: How would you evaluate the technical contribution of this paper?
Very good (4)
Originality/Novelty: How orginal are the concepts presented in this paper?
Very Good (4)
Quality of Presentation: How about the quality of presentation of this paper?
Good (3)
Comments: Please present your comments for this paper
To detect harmful memes, this paper presents a novel solution to merge the single-stream model and dual-stream model, especially with a sematic similarity based cross-modal association. Experiment results show that this method achieve better performance than existing solutions.
Strengths:
- a novel solution to fuse these modals together
- a good summary of current related work
- better detection results than existing methods
Weaknesses:
- you have mentioned three questions in the experiments. However, you haven’t given a clear solution to these questions.
- please check the English expression, especially the enumerate items on page 6
Overall Recommendation: What is your overall recommendation of this paper?
Minor Revision (3)
ISPA-2023 3
Advance: How would you evaluate the relevance of this paper to the conference, considering its scope and goals?
Good (3)
Technical Contribution: How would you evaluate the technical contribution of this paper?
Average (2)
Originality/Novelty: How orginal are the concepts presented in this paper?
Very Good (4)
Quality of Presentation: How about the quality of presentation of this paper?
Good (3)
Comments: Please present your comments for this paper
- Figure 2 needs to be redrawn. It takes up too much space and does not reflect how the CO-ATTN module works.
- Organization needs to adjust. e.g., Table 7 location at an inappropriate place.
- Innovation is not sufficiently prominent in the presentation. In Section III, the authors need to discuss more about the proposed Single-Dual fusion and the reasons why they are more effective.
Overall Recommendation: What is your overall recommendation of this paper?
Minor Revision (3)
陈苏宁
Dear Meng,
We are sorry that we can not change the information. Maybe you can contact with Cristina Ceballos at IEEE for help. And the email address is anorak...@gmail.com
Best regards,
Suning Chen
-----原始邮件-----
发件人:"林萌" <lin...@iie.ac.cn>
发送时间:2024-01-17 16:44:51 (星期三)
收件人: ieee-is...@googlegroups.com
抄送:
主题: [Group-IEEE-ISPA-2023] Request to add author affiliation to meet the requirements for Ph.D. degree application
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "IEEE ISPA 2023" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ieee-ispa-202...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ieee-ispa-2023/4b1e5787.1256b.18d16983915.Coremail.linmeng%40iie.ac.cn.