Download [UPD] Speedy Caution
Natasha Wheat
Trump was taken to Walter Reed National Military Medical Center unannounced early Friday evening "out of an abundance of caution", according to the White House. He will undergo tests and will remain for a few days, according to the memo from Navy Commander Dr Sean Conley.
"President Trump remains in good spirits, has mild symptoms, and has been working throughout the day," White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany said in a statement. "Out of an abundance of caution, and at the recommendation of his physician and medical experts, the president will be working from the presidential offices at Walter Reed for the next few days. President Trump appreciates the outpouring of support for both he and the first lady."
A yellow aspect (Caution) tells the driver that the next signal can be red (Danger) and that they must slow down in preparation to stop at the next signal. The next aspect will be red (Danger) unless it changes as more the train's route is clear or the Signaller sets the signal to caution. The speed limit on SCR past this aspect is 45 mph until the signal aspect clears to a less restrictive aspect. However, it is found in some places to designate a speed limit decrease to 45 mph. If this signal is next it will trigger an AWS horn in the form of a loud continuous beep and must be acknowledged by the driver by pressing Q or by clicking the warning symbol.
This type of signal is found in all depots and sidings. It is mounted to the ground unlike regular signals. It has three lights in a triangular shape and two white lights mean proceed at caution whereas any other indication should be taken as a stop signal or a malfunction.
Many people have had negative encounters with overly eager speedy deleters. The problem is that a careless, hasty, or overzealous CSD can be much worse than a common vandal. Vandalism is extremely easy to spot, can be removed in a few clicks, in very short order, and everything is completely visible. An overeager speedy deleting admin's damage, however, is completely invisible to the common user. The questions thus become:
The policies and guidelines surrounding criteria for speedy deletion are pretty narrow. Since the criteria for speedy deletion allow a user to delete an article unilaterally, they have been narrowly constituted to ensure that only those articles with clear consensus to be deleted qualify. They are explicitly written so that in the case of doubt, the article should be prodded or added to Articles for Deletion. Thus, when considering the criteria for speedy deletion, one should always err on the side of caution. Unfortunately, the general sense is that most people who engage in them do not. This sentiment is probably the result of a few bad apples, but it taints the entire criteria for speedy deletion crowd.
While an article may be eligible for deletion, the community should work with different editors who are willing to prove the value of an article. Nobody would consider speedy deleting Twitter today, but that's exactly what was proposed back in 2007. It was, however, retained and is now a good article.
The problem with criteria for speedy deletion is that it denies the author the chance to validate the article. Sometimes articles that we think are obvious deletes are not obvious in the eyes of the person who wrote the article. By giving the author a chance to prove the value of the article, we give the author an education on Wikipedia. We also give the author the sense that they had a chance to save the article, as compared to being the victim of a lone gun vigilante. If one or even two people tell you that your article is garbage and should be deleted, it comes across as bullying. If, however, you are taken to Articles for Deletion and a number of people collaborate on the verdict, it becomes more tolerable. It becomes a "fair" system.
Shouldn't the author know to read Your First Article before beginning? Your First Article clearly tells authors about Wikipedia's standards and guidelines, it tells them about notability, references, verifiability, etc. It also warns them that articles failing to meet WP's standards may be deleted. Even if the author did not know about Your First Article, there are other safeguards protecting articles from premature deletion. They can challenge the speedy deletion and an admin has to actually perform the deletion.
Just because a page does meet one or more of the criteria, it does not mean it has to be deleted. The reviewing administrator is still allowed to decide whether to delete the page in question and can always decline it. If the admin thinks the article should rather be PRODed or sent to AFD, then he/she may do so. Some people think that when an admin declines a valid speedy deletion request, the best course of action is to slap the tag back on, hoping some other admin will ignore the previous decline and delete it. Others think they have to complain to the admin in question about it, although his decision was well within policy. There are just two tags when an admin can only decide one thing, i.e. to delete: valid G10 and G12 taggings. In all other cases they may decline the request and not speedy delete the page.
Admins should check to see if the article has undergone admin shopping. If another admin has declined a speedy deletion, subsequent admins must as well (even if they disagree with the decision) unless it is a valid tag of one of the two mentioned above or if it is tagged with a different criterion that does fit.
If an admin declines a speedy request, this does not mean that you should simply retag it and hope a different admin comes along. If an admin, or anybody unaffiliated with the article for that matter, removes a CSD tag, send it to AFD or PROD; don't simply replace the tag hoping somebody else will delete it. This is Adminshopping and should be discouraged. Admins should also not delete speedy articles that were declined, especially if it was declined by another admin. This only encourages sloppy CSD work and Adminshopping. If you disagree with another person or admin, discuss the rationale with that person. The only exceptions to this rule are clear COPYVIO and BLP Violations. However, if you find an article may meet another criterion, different from the one that was declined, it can be retagged with that new rationale. This is largely because some admins only handle certain criteria and leave others alone; the admin who declined the first request may simply not feel like he is able to judge the other criterion.
When in doubt, err on the side of caution. Send it to AfD/PROD. Even if it is obviously something needing to be deleted, if it doesn't cleanly fit one of the accepted criteria, send it to AfD or tag it with a Prod. At AfD, the verdict may be obvious, and it may be speedily closed, but at least you gave the article's creator a chance to defend the article and obtained a broader perspective than just two editors.
The difference between an article that falls under the speedy deletion criteria and an article that falls under other deletion criteria may seem like a technical distinction, which in the interests of expediency, perhaps we should sometimes dispense with. Indeed, if an article looks non-notable, it may be tempting to go ahead and stretch the speedy deletion criteria a bit to try to avoid the trouble of an AfD. However:
This section describes how to install a customized Speedy Entry keymap for German and Swiss-German keyboards for Finale for Windows. The techniques can also be used for other international keyboards. Installing the customized keymap requires editing your FINALE.INI file directly. Use caution when editing FINALE.INI: follow the warnings and instructions below.
One year later, the steam pipe is capped, the bathroom radiator gone, and an electric line runs to the first outlet that bathroom has ever had. A bonus is that the small room feels bigger. The living room ceiling below will soon be closed, repaired and repainted. Old house repairs are constant and never speedy.
If you have suffered a personal injury, you may be required to undergo surgery to address the problem. With a variety of surgical procedures and advancement in technology, recovery from a personal injury surgery is easier now than ever before. To ensure a speedy and safe recovery try the 10 tips below.
If you have an incision in the stomach or chest area, something as simple as a sneeze can cause pain in or possible tearing in your incision. Try to exercise caution or minimize movement that can affect your incision area. For example, in the case of coughing or sneezing, hold a pillow to your chest or stomach to prevent forceful movement.
Dr. Noyes, an assistant professor in the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology at NYU Langone, cautions that, while promising, zinc fingers can be difficult to control. Since they are not always specific to a single gene, some combinations can affect DNA sequences beyond a particular target, leading to unintended changes in genetic code.
df19127ead