In spite of Microsoft, Intel and Nokia "betting the house" on TPMs
(Trusted Platform Modules), all their competitors in the mobile
space including Google and Apple, have rather settled on embedded
TEE (Trusted Execution Environment) schemes like this:
http://www.nasdaq.com/article/samsung-mobilesecurity-platform-to-be-part-of-next-android-20140625-00937
http://images.apple.com/iphone/business/docs/iOS_Security_Feb14.pdf
How come the competition didn't buy into TPMs?
TPMs are based on a
"one-size-fits-all" API philosophy.
Since
Intel relies on external vendors supplying
TPM-components this (IMHO fairly unwieldy) API must also be
standardized
making the process updating TPMs extremely slow and
costly. The constraints on silicon that existed during the
"Palladium" days are since long gone.
TEEs OTOH can be fitted at any time with
application-specific
security APIs which both can be standardized or entirely
proprietary. In fact, even third-parties can introduce new security
APIs using GlobalPlatform's TEE.
Converted into practice:
My old Nexus 7 got
hardware-protected keys through an OTA update while my new
Dell XPS-15 will be stuck with TPM 1.2 during the rest of its life!