m.gorzalski@gmail.com> wrote: I'm getting around to experimenting with these approaches. Instead of using the Subjects taxonomy as you suggested, do we have the ability

m.gorzalski@gmail.com> wrote: It would be so much more work for us to make those pre-migration edits, that the pain and suffering cost would be far more severe than the financial

Hi Matt, If I understand correctly, I could download and integrate the LCSH SKOS > file into AtoM so the terms would be in the taxonomies, and would

m.gorzalski@gmail.com> wrote: Seems like a migration would be OK because it looks like the RG 27-10-1 is captured in EAD export. Am I seeing that right? -- You received this message

m.gorzalski@gmail.com> wrote: Dan, Thanks for the Trinity example. I like how it looks on the tree view on the left side of the screen. Yes, box in this case is treated as a level of

Hi, Those are some great possibilities, Dan! I find ArchivesSpace's use of modal windows to be helpful at times and also painful at times. I don

Glad to hear it, Matt! Yes, that was my second suggestion - though I understand I sent you a lot of text; it might have gotten lost in there! The other

m.gorzalski@gmail.com> wrote: Hello everyone, The bulk of the AtoM user examples on Artefactual's website are for Canadian institutions. Are any US users willing to share