Clarification on AtoM Source: .tar.gz vs GitHub for v2.9.2

26 views
Skip to first unread message

Di

unread,
Sep 24, 2025, 4:58:22 PM (14 days ago) Sep 24
to AtoM Users

Hi Atom Team,

I noticed that both a .tar.gz package and the GitHub repository are available as sources for AtoM. I’m currently looking to deploy the stable version 2.9.2, which should support the OIDC plugin and JavaScript challenges.

However, it appears that the .tar.gz release does not include the OIDC plugin — is that correct?

Could you please clarify which source (GitHub or .tar.gz) is recommended for obtaining a complete and up-to-date stable build, especially when these features are required?

Thank you for your help.

Best regards,
Di

Johan Pieterse

unread,
Oct 6, 2025, 1:14:55 AM (2 days ago) Oct 6
to AtoM Users
Hi Di

I cannot comment on the OIDC but the Github is normally the latest build. So bugs fixes could have been done on the Github that stillexists in the tar.gz

Johan
The Archive and Heritage Group

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages