Based on the submission documentation definition provided by the doc (pasted bellow), I am wondering if those materials could be accessible from Atom.
Actually, some documentation could be precious for our archivist to organize the structure of a fond (letter from donator, data collected during the appraisal). It is very interesting to keep this documentation preserved into the AIP but it would be great to get it accessible to our archivist through AtoM. submissionDocumentation folder could be kept in draft status to avoid any access to anonymous user.
Would it be possible that AtoM harvests submissionDocumention content ?
Question to the commmunity:
How do you preserve and access to documentation related to digital object through your workflow ?
Thank you for sharing your experience.
"Submission documentation is a concept in Archivematica that accounts for materials that are related to the digital objects being preserved, but aren’t strictly part of the collection - for example, donor agreements, correspondence about the materials, conservation reports, etc. If Archivematica sees that a transfer includes submission documentation, it can include descriptions of this material in the AIP METS file."
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AtoM Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ica-atom-user...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ica-atom-users/28ca10d4-5663-473c-b155-744925b3453fn%40googlegroups.com.
Hi Dan and All,
Thanks again for your answer.
Yes it is clear that those materials should
be kept out of anonymous user access.
In the meantime, AtoM is also a tool used though the accessioning process. Of course different practices may exist, currently part of rearrangement of the levels of an archive is done through AtoM.
I hope some feedback on the management of documentation related to objects could be discussed and shared here.Cheers,