Hi Steve,
Thanks for following up. We ran it again with a different test file (using records without a current digital object), and got the same results even without the replace option.
php symfony digitalobject:load --index /path/digital_object_load_test.csv
>> digital-object Load digital objects from /path/digital_object_load_test.csv...
(Mar 01, 12:50:26 PM) Loading 'A-10289.jpg' (1 of 6 remaining)
(Mar 01, 12:50:27 PM) Loading 'A-10290.jpg' (2 of 6 remaining)
(Mar 01, 12:50:27 PM) Loading 'A-10291.jpg' (3 of 6 remaining)
(Mar 01, 12:50:27 PM) Loading 'A-10292.jpg' (4 of 6 remaining)
(Mar 01, 12:50:28 PM) Loading 'A-10293.jpg' (5 of 6 remaining)
(Mar 01, 12:50:28 PM) Loading 'A-10308.jpg' (6 of 6 remaining)
>> digital-object Successfully Loaded 6 digital objects.
I’ve attached the CSV and a corresponding screenshot. The objects were loaded successfully but we have the same results with “Untitled”, for all records.
Tim
Tim Hutchinson
Head, University Archives and Special Collections
University of Saskatchewan
University Library
Ph: 306-966-6028 (voicemail)
From: ica-ato...@googlegroups.com <ica-ato...@googlegroups.com>
On Behalf Of Steve Breker
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2021 2:14 PM
To: AtoM Users <ica-ato...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: [atom-users] Re: digital object load task - incomplete indexing
CAUTION: External to USask. Verify sender and use caution with links and attachments. Forward suspicious emails to phis...@usask.ca
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "AtoM Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/ica-atom-users/TTsFjUjAWcE/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
ica-atom-user...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ica-atom-users/a8997c63-753d-4d5c-b845-3aab5b1be297n%40googlegroups.com.
Hi Steve,
Thanks for confirming the bug. We’re looking into whether it makes sense to rebuild the search index at this point (for only 60 new digital objects), but I’m sure that will work. I was able to manually force the re-indexing by resaving an individual record.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ica-atom-users/4a086f19-5e15-43ef-9d34-39d11510d975n%40googlegroups.com.
Hi Steve,
Thanks for pointing out those options. Combining –slug and –update did the trick nicely, and in almost no time – all the affected records are children of the same collection.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ica-atom-users/38e108ba-7d4d-44df-87ba-5a62c7189953n%40googlegroups.com.