Hello,
I realized when comparing the RSMC Tokyo Best Track Data (JMA) and IBTrACS data that for Typhoon TRIX in 1952, the JMA data starts at 00 UTC October 16 1952 (the initial latitude and longitude is N8.7 E136.2), but the IBTrACS data for TOKYO starts at 12 UTC October 16 1952 (the initial latitude and longitude is also N8.7 E136.2).
So, is the IBTrACS data incorrectly 12 hours behind?
I look forward to hearing from you.
Yuto Ono
Mie University (Japan)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "IBTrACS Q&A" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ibtracs-qa+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ibtracs-qa/CA%2B9RWUULy0YC9p9H15nybvQ575w_ASdCmCfSD7cTT6vB%3DxJ9%2BA%40mail.gmail.com.
Hello Jennifer,
Thanks for your reply.
I understand the algorithm to correct the discrepancy.
When I looked up Typhoon TRIX in 1952, I checked the contents of two old documents (JMA; note that they are written in Japan Standard Time(UTC+9)) that describe the strength, position of the typhoon and aircraft observation data in October 1952, as well as the position of the typhoon on the weather charts of JMA (1200GMT) and NOAA Central Library (1230GMT).
However, I could not find any contradictory descriptions in the current RSMC Tokyo Best Track Data (JMA), so I suspected that there was a problem with the USA data, but this was not a definitive reason.
Yuto Ono
Mie University (Japan)