Finally had a chance to really sit down and test out all the options,
goodies, search functions, layers, etc. The alerts are really nice,
and being able to click the alert and bring up the NWS info is
fantastic. Everything functioned as it should, there were no lockups,
no serious time-delays, it was efficient and intuitive.
Although it took me a few mouse scrolls to get used to how quickly the
zoom function works. It moves in and out very rapidly, I got
accustomed to it.
I spent a lot of time on the historical tracks. I love it! It
functions very smooth and efficiently and is very intuitive. I had no
trouble selecting up to 10 storms, though loading time is a bit slow,
not to a degree which makes it uncomfortable to use.
Now, I know you didn't just want all back-patting, :-) so here are the things
I noticed that were less than perfect:
1. This isn't a bug, it's an aesthetic/user issue. To differentiate
wind speeds you have chosen the green to red spectrum. The problem I
found is that the orange color differences are simply too subtle to
allow me to determine the category of storm based on the color of the
wind field. The problem was pronounced when looking at historic
tracks. For example, I honestly could not tell you whether Charley had
Cat 1, 2 or 3 winds when he hit Lakeland. It's nice to use the same
color spectrum for continuity but it renders the wind field data
useless as far as color categorization. I would stare hard at the
chips on the right and then try to compare them to the colors in the
wind field, but eventually gave up. I could not be certain which color
matched best. In addition, the category 4 is a deeper red than a
category 5, which doesn't match the progression you've laid out.
2. On some storms, particularly large ones where the wind field
overlaps significantly, the windfield graphic is opaque enough to blot
out the map entirely, making it impossible to see which cities were
affected. For example, try to see where hurricane Donna landed or
which cities her wind field affected. (with wind field enabled).
(don't know if this is correctable, but thought I'd mention it.)
3. Minor: When you click the points of interest... in the text field,
a right parenthesis is not being stripped. Usually shows up in the
first line, and when compared to the expanded data it appears to be the
parenthesis that belongs to "(point of interest #xx)"
Overall, just love it!
Bev Mott