Inflation politics is clearer than inflation economics

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Key Wu

unread,
Jan 19, 2022, 11:06:13 AM1/19/22
to

Inflation politics is clearer than inflation economics

William A. Galston
The milk section of a grocery store is pictured in Los Angeles April 7, 2011. On the streets of America, the debate over inflation is over. Prices are too high and rising too fast, many people say. But policy-makers at the U.S. Federal Reserve largely agree that promoting economic growth is still more urgent that constraining a nascent pick-up in consumer prices.   REUTERS/Mario Anzuoni (UNITED STATES - Tags: BUSINESS FOOD)

Ever since inflation reared its ugly head, economists have been arguing about whether it is a transitory problem or a structural problem, with some economists going so far as to distinguish between “good” inflation and “bad” inflation. But political scientists think about inflation as it impacts the American voter and in that respect the problem is much clearer. Even if the economists who think inflation will decline this year turn out to be right, the effect on working-class voters may be disastrous for Democrats in the midterm elections.

As inflation keeps rising, the Biden administration cannot ignore what people are experiencing in their daily lives. Overwhelming numbers of Americans list inflation as a big worry. However, as prices rise in the most visible parts of the economy—food, gas and electricity for example—the impact has been different for lower and higher-income Americans. A recent AP-NORC poll found that “half of people in households earning less than $50,000 a year say that price increases have had a major impact on their finances. Only a third of those in households earning more than $50,000 say the same.”

A Gallup poll found similar results. Seventy one percent of households earning less than $40,000 reported that inflation was causing them severe (28%) or moderate (42%) hardship. While only 29% of households earning more than $100,000 reported severe (2%) or moderate (26%) hardship. Finally, 71% of people earning over $100,000 reported that price rises caused them no hardship.

Think of it this way. Some people go through the grocery store adding up the items as they put things in their cart to make sure that they have enough money to pay the bill when they get to the checkout counter. Others simply put the items that they want in their cart without worrying about the total. These are two very different groups. For the former, inflation is a daily source of anxiety, especially in two places most Americans cannot avoid—the gas station and the grocery store. For higher-income Americans, inflation is a cause for concern, but its impact is less serious.

The correlation between income and education is straightforward: college graduates earn more than high school graduates (because exit poll data on income of voters in 2020 is incomplete, but educational attainment is not, we use education as a proxy). It is not surprising that among people with no college education 13% report severe hardship and 40% report moderate hardship because of inflation. For people with a college degree the impact is much less dramatic; only 4% report severe hardship and 26% report moderate hardship.

The people who feel the impact of inflation most are also those who cast critical swing votes in the last two presidential elections, where a wide education gap has opened up between the two parties. Among voters with a B.A. or more, Biden got 61% of the vote, up from Hillary Clinton’s 57% in 2016. This total included 57% of white voters with a college degree or more, 69% of Latinos, and 92% of African Americans. The gap in support for Biden among whites with and without college degrees was 24 points; among Hispanics with and without college degrees, 14 points. By contrast, there was no education gap whatever among Black voters. Voters with incomes under $50,000 are a large group. They made up 38% of the vote in the 2018 midterms and 35% of the vote in 2020.

Biden won the 2020 election in part by improving his vote among working class white voters in contested states. In Michigan and Wisconsin, for example, white non-college voters constituted more than half of the electorate (52% and 56%), swamping the number of Black and Hispanic voters in those states. In fact, as the following table shows, white non-college voters outnumber Black and Hispanic voters combined in all but two contested states, Georgia and Texas, where they are about even. Given that not all minority voters, especially Hispanics, vote for Democrats, one can see that to even hope to retain the House and/or Senate, Democrats must cut into the white non-college vote—as Biden did in the 2020 election—while reversing the flight of working-class Hispanics from the Democratic ranks.

Screenshot-2022-01-14-144952-1.webp
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages