Choosing the next Dalai Lama is surprisingly dangerous
Renewed political instability in Tibet could well spiral into the next U.S.-China flash point.
Nolan Peterson is a nonresident senior fellow at the Center for European Policy Analysis. Alexander Noyes is a fellow at the Brookings Institution.
China is increasingly meddling in the process of choosing the next Dalai Lama, attempting to handpick a successor for the Tibetan Buddhist leader who turned 90 in July. These machinations are likely to backfire, possibly sparking a renewed popular resistance in Tibet that could lead to large-scale violence. America should act quickly and decisively to push China to respect the long-standing Tibetan traditions of spiritual leadership succession. Doing so will help deter conflict in other potential flash points in the region, including Taiwan.
America has long supported Tibet, dating back to assistance provided after the Chinese invasion in 1950. The Dalai Lama, then only 24, escaped to India in 1959 and established a government in exile. Until the early 1970s, a CIA-backed insurgency waged a guerrilla war against China from Tibet and bases in Nepal. In 1979, the Dalai Lama chose autonomy over independence. He won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1989 and this “middle way” has held, and largely maintained peace, for nearly four decades.