Re: RTI anniversary

[Sarbajit Roy‏]

You mean 15 June 2005 ?

On 10/10/14, vijay kumbhar kvij...@gmail.com [HumJanenge]
<HumJa...@yahoogroups.co.in> wrote:
> Dear friends,
>
>
> In todays Times of india ( http://goo.gl/97XO1r ) and even on Wikipedia
> date of anniversary of RTI act is given as 13th October. Wikipedia goes
> further to say that "The effective date is often incorrectly referred to as
> 12 October 2005. The Act actually came to force on the midnight between the
> 12th and 13th, which means that it came into effect from the 13th onwards."
>
>
> I don't know why there is unnecessary confusion when in the act itself date
> is specifically written on first page?
>
>
> *Regards, Vijay Kumbhar*
> *(Surajya Sangharsh Samiti)*
> *www.surajya.org <http://www.surajya.org>*
> *vijaykumbhar.blogspot.in <http://vijaykumbhar.blogspot.in>*
> *09923299199*
>

[Sarbajit Roy‏]

INCORRECT.

It opened for citizens to file applications on the 100th day - see
5(1) and 5(2).

PS: That is why HJ-GG is far superior to those other fellows on Yahoo.whoo who ?

Sarbajit.

On 10/15/14, Lokesh Batra batra_...@yahoo.com [HumJanenge]
<HumJa...@yahoogroups.co.in> wrote:
> We need to add 120 days given for setting up the system after the Act was
> enacted on 15 June 2014. It was opened for citizens' on completion of above
> 120 days period.
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
> -Lokesh
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: "vijay kumbhar kvij...@gmail.com [HumJanenge]"
> <HumJa...@yahoogroups.co.in>
> To: HumJa...@yahoogroups.co.in
> Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 10:46 AM
> Subject: [HumJanenge-YG] RTI anniversary

>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Dear friends,
> In todays Times
> of india ( http://goo.gl/97XO1r ) and even on Wikipedia date of anniversary
> of
> RTI act is given as 13th October. Wikipedia goes further to say that “The
> effective date is often incorrectly referred to as 12 October 2005. The Act
> actually came to force on the midnight between the 12th and 13th, which
> means
> that it came into effect from the 13th onwards.”
> I don’t know why
> there is unnecessary confusion when in the act itself date is specifically
> written on first page?

> Regards,
> Vijay Kumbhar
> (Surajya Sangharsh Samiti)
>
>
> www.surajya.org
> vijaykumbhar.blogspot.in
> 09923299199
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> Posted by: vijay kumbhar <kvij...@gmail.com>