On Jun 20, 12:27 pm,
spare...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> On Jun 20, 5:24 am, Charles Bell <
cbel...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > IMO you're just evading because you don't want to face the fact Reagan
> > > and Rands conceptualization of capitalism were clearly not the same
> > > thing.
>
> > The title of the thread alleges that I would consider a Reagan a
> > 'socialist' because he thought that some paid taxes and others did not
>
> I'm really just pointing out the logical inconsistency of your views.
No, You quoted Reagan on taxation and incorrectly assumed/claimed that
had anything to do with socialism.
> Still evading an answer. Define socialism.
>
Already have.
> Taxation, services and regulations most certainty have something to do
> with socialism.
That's not the issue. You talk about an attribute as if that were the
entity: (1) That pear is yellow. (2) The sun is yellow. (3)
Therefore a pear is the sun.
Now deal with 'socialism" as I have referred to it via its inventor
(of the word, at least) Leroux - who never once (AFAIK) wrote about
taxes or regulation even though he was known as an economist:
(1) There is 'society' and it is a whole apart from any one or several
individuals.
(2) There is no such thing as 'society' that is not a creation of or
dissolution by an association of individuals.
(1) <<But do not say any more that society is everything and that the
individual is nothing, or that society comes before the individuals,
or that the citizens are not anything but some devoted subjects of
society, functionaries of society who must find, for good or ill,
their satisfaction in all that which contributes to the social aim; do
not make of society a sort of large animal of which we would be the
molecules, the parts, or the members, of which some would be the head,
the others the stomach, the others the feet, the hands, the nails or
the hair. Instead of society being the result of a free and
spontaneous life for all those who compose it, will not want the life
of each man to be a function of the social life that you would have
imagined: for you will arrive by that path only at brutalization and
despotism; you would arrest, you would immobilize the human spirit,
all while pretending to lead it.>>
<<Each man, like each generation of men, draws his sap and his life
from Humanity. But each man draws his life there by virtue of the
faculties that he has in him, by virtue of his own spontaneity. Thus,
he remains free, though associated. He is divinely united to Humanity;
but Humanity, instead of absorbing him, is revealed in him.>>
(2) <<Since there is no such entity as "society," since society is
only a number of individual men, this meant, in practice, that the
rulers of society were exempt from moral law; subject only to
traditional rituals, they held total power and exacted blind obedience--
on the implicit principle of: "The good is that which is good for
society (or for the tribe, the race, the nation), and the ruler's
edicts are its voice on earth."
<<Individual rights are the means to subordinate society to moral
law.>>