Shakespeare Was Not Oxford, Sackville, Bacon, Greville, or Marlowe, And Peele Had Nothing To Do With The Writing Of Titus Andronicus

[Jim KQKnave]

| In fact, there is so much evidence concerning `
~ Shakespeare's authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a $
* major problem trying to condense it all into a paper @
% of reasonable length. |

^ Search this group "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-Author"=
= Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author |
& of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup, _
$ William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate ~
& supported by the historical evidence. %

http://tinyurl.com/cojgwl =

* see also #

| http://ShakespeareAuthorship.com `

~ The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all _*
= http://shakesandbacon.yolasite.com &*

[marco]

i agree

[Jack Ryan]

@ In fact, there is so much evidence concerning `
& Shakespeare's authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a @
@ major problem trying to condense it all into a paper %
_ of reasonable length. @

$ Search this group "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-Author"^
^ Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author @
| of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup, #
@ William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate &
| supported by the historical evidence. _

@ http://tinyurl.com/cojgwl ^

@ see also ~

@ http://ShakespeareAuthorship.com `

& The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all #@
^ http://shakesandbacon.yolasite.com |@

[Anonymous]

~ In fact, there is so much evidence concerning $
^ Shakespeare's authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a %
+ major problem trying to condense it all into a paper #
| of reasonable length. ~

_ Search this group "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-Author"@
@ Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author ~
& of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup, `
= William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate ^

& supported by the historical evidence. |

~ http://tinyurl.com/cojgwl @

~ see also

% http://ShakespeareAuthorship.com $

^ The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all `=
@ http://shakesandbacon.yolasite.com &~

[Anonymous]

| In fact, there is so much evidence concerning $

% Shakespeare's authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a +
@ major problem trying to condense it all into a paper ^
| of reasonable length. -

` Search this group "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-Author"&
& Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author |
= of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup, #
~ William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate %
= supported by the historical evidence. \

| http://tinyurl.com/cojgwl &

\ see also +

+ http://ShakespeareAuthorship.com $

% The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all #~
& http://shakesandbacon.yolasite.com =|

[Jack Ryan]

= In fact, there is so much evidence concerning +
\ Shakespeare's authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a ^
% major problem trying to condense it all into a paper @
# of reasonable length. =

% Search this group "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-Author"$
$ Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author =

` of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup, |

~ William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate \
` supported by the historical evidence. #

& http://tinyurl.com/cojgwl $

= see also ~

^ http://ShakespeareAuthorship.com +

\ The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all |
$ http://shakesandbacon.yolasite.com `=

[graham.a...@btinternet.com]

Not certain why people keep repeating the same thing, or are they robots?

The title is wrong too! It should read "Oxford, Sackville, Bacon, Greville, or Marlowe was not Shakespeare. And Peele Had Nothing To Do With The Writing Of Titus Andronicus"

All of which is true

Thanks
William Shakespeare

[sealsd...@gmail.com]

On Saturday, October 10, 2015 at 10:41:01 AM UTC-7, Jim KQKnave wrote:

Ah ha, you didn't list Will Derby as who He was not.

[Anonymous]

~ In fact, there is so much evidence concerning ^
$ Shakespeare's authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a %

\ major problem trying to condense it all into a paper @

| of reasonable length. ~

\ Search this group "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-Author"=
= Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author ~
# of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup, +
~ William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate $
# supported by the historical evidence. |

& http://tinyurl.com/cojgwl =

~ see also +

% http://ShakespeareAuthorship.com ^

$ The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all +
= http://shakesandbacon.yolasite.com #~

[Anonymous]

] In fact, there is so much evidence concerning ^

$ Shakespeare's authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a #
+ major problem trying to condense it all into a paper %

} of reasonable length. ~

\ Search this group "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-Author" =

} Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author =!
^ of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup, +#

~ William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate $
# supported by the historical evidence. |

& http://tinyurl.com/cojgwl =

~ see also +

^ http://ShakespeareAuthorship.com +#

= The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all ~^
& http://shakesandbacon.yolasite.com +@

[Jack Ryan]

] In fact, there is so much evidence concerning }

^ Shakespeare's authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a \
& major problem trying to condense it all into a paper !
% of reasonable length. +

= Search this group "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-Author" ~
% Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author ~#
} of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup, &\
+ William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate ^
\ supported by the historical evidence. |

$ http://tinyurl.com/cojgwl ~

+ see also &

} http://ShakespeareAuthorship.com &\

~ The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all +}
$ http://shakesandbacon.yolasite.com &!

[Anonymous]

# In fact, there is so much evidence concerning #
} Shakespeare's authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a =
~ major problem trying to condense it all into a paper +
& of reasonable length. \

% Search this group "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-Author"+
& Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author $
# of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup, ~*
\ William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate }
= supported by the historical evidence. |

^ http://tinyurl.com/cojgwl $

* see also ~

# http://ShakespeareAuthorship.com ~=

$ The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all \#
^ http://shakesandbacon.yolasite.com ~+

[Anonymous]

^ In fact, there is so much evidence concerning ^
$ Shakespeare's authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a \
\ major problem trying to condense it all into a paper =
* of reasonable length. &

% Search this group "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-Author"=
* Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author #
^ of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup, +}
& William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate $
\ supported by the historical evidence. |

` http://tinyurl.com/cojgwl #

} see also +

^ http://ShakespeareAuthorship.com +\

# The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all &^
` http://shakesandbacon.yolasite.com %=

[graham.a...@btinternet.com]

What's really funny about this thread is the chap that keeps posting the same thing, apart from clearly being completely INSANE! Is that he uses the name that the anti-Shakespeare people did in that rubbish film!!!

[Anonymous]

\ In fact, there is so much evidence concerning ~`
` Shakespeare's authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a +
+ major problem trying to condense it all into a paper %*
# of reasonable length. +

* Search this group "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-Author"%
# Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author $
\ of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup, }=
+ William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate `$
~ supported by the historical evidence. ^

^ http://tinyurl.com/cojgwl $

= see also }*

\ http://ShakespeareAuthorship.com }#

$ The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all +\
^ http://shakesandbacon.yolasite.com *%

[Anonymous]

} In fact, there is so much evidence concerning ~$
$ Shakespeare's authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a %
% major problem trying to condense it all into a paper `+
= of reasonable length. %

+ Search this group "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-Author"`
= Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author \
} of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup, ^
% William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate $\
~ supported by the historical evidence. =

= http://tinyurl.com/cojgwl \

see also ^+

} http://ShakespeareAuthorship.com ^=

\ The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all %}
= http://shakesandbacon.yolasite.com +`

[Anonymous]

= In fact, there is so much evidence concerning \%
% Shakespeare's authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a &
^ major problem trying to condense it all into a paper #$
^ of reasonable length.

$ Search this group "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-Author"#
@ Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author +
= of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup, ~
& William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate %+
\ supported by the historical evidence.

^ http://tinyurl.com/cojgwl +

# see also ~$

= http://ShakespeareAuthorship.com ~

+ The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all =&
@ http://shakesandbacon.yolasite.com $#

[Anonymous]

# In fact, there is so much evidence concerning ~+
+ Shakespeare's authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a =
^ major problem trying to condense it all into a paper ^@
^ of reasonable length.

@ Search this group "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-Author"^
% Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author &
# of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup, $
= William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate +&
~ supported by the historical evidence.~

http://tinyurl.com/cojgwl &

^ see also $@

# http://ShakespeareAuthorship.com $

& The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all #=
% http://shakesandbacon.yolasite.com @^

[Jim KQKnave]

> In fact, there is so much evidence concerning =@
@ Shakespeare's authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a ^
% major problem trying to condense it all into a paper %&
* of reasonable length.

& Search this group "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-Author"%
+ Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author #
> of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup, ~
^ William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate @*
= supported by the historical evidence.=

http://tinyurl.com/cojgwl #

% see also ~&

> http://ShakespeareAuthorship.com ~

# The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all <^
+ http://shakesandbacon.yolasite.com &%

[Anonymous]

] In fact, there is so much evidence concerning %~
~ Shakespeare's authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a @
+ major problem trying to condense it all into a paper &*
# of reasonable length.

* Search this group "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-Author"&
+ Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author <
] of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup, =
@ William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate ~#
% supported by the historical evidence.%

http://tinyurl.com/cojgwl <

& see also =*

] http://ShakespeareAuthorship.com =

> The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all <@
+ http://shakesandbacon.yolasite.com *&

[ArtNea...@germanymail.com]

hmmm

[Jim KQKnave]

\ In fact, there is so much evidence concerning @+
+ Shakespeare's authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a *
] major problem trying to condense it all into a paper =#
> of reasonable length.

# Search this group "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-Author"=
] Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author &
\ of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup, %
* William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate +>
@ supported by the historical evidence.@

~ http://tinyurl.com/cojgwl &

= see also %#

\ http://ShakespeareAuthorship.com %

~ The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all &*
] http://shakesandbacon.yolasite.com #=

[Jim KQKnave]

* In fact, there is so much evidence concerning #+
+ Shakespeare's authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a *
] major problem trying to condense it all into a paper &>
~ of reasonable length.

> Search this group "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-Author"&
] Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author @
* of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup, =
* William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate +~
# supported by the historical evidence.#

\ http://tinyurl.com/cojgwl @

& see also =>

* http://ShakespeareAuthorship.com =

\ The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all @*
] http://shakesandbacon.yolasite.com >&

[Anonymous]

% In fact, there is so much evidence concerning <]
] Shakespeare's authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a %
* major problem trying to condense it all into a paper @\
+ of reasonable length.

\ Search this group "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-Author"@

* Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author #

% of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup, &
% William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate ]+

< supported by the historical evidence.<

~ http://tinyurl.com/cojgwl #

@ see also &\

% http://ShakespeareAuthorship.com &

~ The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all #%
* http://shakesandbacon.yolasite.com \@

[Anonymous]

$ In fact, there is so much evidence concerning ~%
% Shakespeare's authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a \
] major problem trying to condense it all into a paper &<
* of reasonable length.

$ Search this group "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-Author"&
] Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author @
$ of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup, \
* William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate %*

~ supported by the historical evidence.~

+ http://tinyurl.com/cojgwl @

& see also \<

+ http://ShakespeareAuthorship.com \

+ The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all @$
] http://shakesandbacon.yolasite.com <&

[Anonymous]

@ In fact, there is so much evidence concerning *$
$ Shakespeare's authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a +
% major problem trying to condense it all into a paper {\
= of reasonable length.

@ Search this group "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-Author"{
% Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author ^
@ of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup, +
= William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate $=
* supported by the historical evidence.*

~ http://tinyurl.com/cojgwl ^

{ see also +\

~ http://ShakespeareAuthorship.com +

~ The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all ^@
% http://shakesandbacon.yolasite.com \{

[Jim KQKnave]

^ In fact, there is so much evidence concerning ~%
% Shakespeare's authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a {
@ major problem trying to condense it all into a paper $=
* of reasonable length.

^ Search this group "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-Author"$
@ Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author \
^ of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup, {

* William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate %*
~ supported by the historical evidence.~

+ http://tinyurl.com/cojgwl \

$ see also {=

+ http://ShakespeareAuthorship.com {

+ The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all ^
@ http://shakesandbacon.yolasite.com =$

[marco]

i agree

[Anonymous]

$ In fact, there is so much evidence concerning %@
@ Shakespeare's authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a +
^ major problem trying to condense it all into a paper =
~ of reasonable length.

$ Search this group "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-Author"=
! Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author ^
$ of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup, +
~ William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate @~

% supported by the historical evidence.%

! http://tinyurl.com/cojgwl *

= see also +

* http://ShakespeareAuthorship.com +

* The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all $
^ http://shakesandbacon.yolasite.com =

[marco]

i agree

[Anonymous]

| In fact, there is so much evidence concerning ^%
% Shakespeare's authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a ~
$ major problem trying to condense it all into a paper +
* of reasonable length.

| Search this group "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-Author"+
! Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author $
| of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup, ~

* William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate %*

^ supported by the historical evidence.^

! http://tinyurl.com/cojgwl @

+ see also ~

@ http://ShakespeareAuthorship.com ~

@ The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all |
$ http://shakesandbacon.yolasite.com +

[Jim KQKnave]

% In fact, there is so much evidence concerning ~`
# Shakespeare's authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a +
| major problem trying to condense it all into a paper %
# of reasonable length.

% Search this group "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-Author"%
@ Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author |^
^ of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup, +
` William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate #

~ supported by the historical evidence.~

@ http://tinyurl.com/cojgwl *

! see also +

^ http://ShakespeareAuthorship.com +

* The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all %
| http://shakesandbacon.yolasite.com %#

[ArtNea...@germanymail.com]

.

[Anonymous]

& In fact, there is so much evidence concerning ^~
| Shakespeare's authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a @
% major problem trying to condense it all into a paper `
| of reasonable length.

& Search this group "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-Author"&
* Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author %+
+ of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup, @
~ William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate |

^ supported by the historical evidence.^

* http://tinyurl.com/cojgwl #

` see also @

+ http://ShakespeareAuthorship.com @

# The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all `
% http://shakesandbacon.yolasite.com &|

[Jim KQKnave]

` In fact, there is so much evidence concerning @^

# Shakespeare's authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a |
+ major problem trying to condense it all into a paper %
# of reasonable length.

` Search this group "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-Author"`
% Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author +~
~ of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup, |
^ William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate #

@ supported by the historical evidence.@

% http://tinyurl.com/cojgwl &

^ see also |

~ http://ShakespeareAuthorship.com |

& The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all
+ http://shakesandbacon.yolasite.com `#

[ArtNea...@germanymail.com]

.

[Jim KQKnave]

$ In fact, there is so much evidence concerning %|
+ Shakespeare's authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a $
` major problem trying to condense it all into a paper &
+ of reasonable length.

~ Search this group "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-Author"$
& Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author `@
@ of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup, ~
| William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate +

% supported by the historical evidence.%

& http://tinyurl.com/cojgwl #

| see also ~

$ http://ShakespeareAuthorship.com ~

# The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all @
` http://shakesandbacon.yolasite.com $+

[Anonymous]

# In fact, there is so much evidence concerning &+
` Shakespeare's authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a #
$ major problem trying to condense it all into a paper ~
` of reasonable length. <

| Search this group "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-Author"#
~ Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author $%
% of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup, |
+ William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate `
& supported by the historical evidence.&

~ http://tinyurl.com/cojgwl <

+ see also |

# http://ShakespeareAuthorship.com |

> The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all %
$ http://shakesandbacon.yolasite.com #`

[Jack Ryan]

$ In fact, there is so much evidence concerning |@
^ Shakespeare's authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a $
+ major problem trying to condense it all into a paper #
^ of reasonable length. ~

% Search this group "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-Author"$
# Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author +`
` of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup, %
@ William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate ^

| supported by the historical evidence.|

# http://tinyurl.com/cojgwl ~

@ see also %

$ http://ShakespeareAuthorship.com %

% The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all `
+ http://shakesandbacon.yolasite.com $^

[Anonymous]

= In fact, there is so much evidence concerning %^
+ Shakespeare's authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a =
$ major problem trying to condense it all into a paper @

+ of reasonable length. ~

` Search this group "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-Author"=
/ Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author $#
# of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup, `
^ William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate +

% supported by the historical evidence.%

@ http://tinyurl.com/cojgwl /

^ see also `

= http://ShakespeareAuthorship.com `

` The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all #
$ http://shakesandbacon.yolasite.com =+

[Hillary Clinson]

] In fact, there is so much evidence concerning ^#
/ Shakespeare's authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a ]
= major problem trying to condense it all into a paper %
/ of reasonable length. ~

+ Search this group "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-Author"]
$ Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author =`
` of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup, +
# William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate /
^ supported by the historical evidence.^

% http:$$tinyurl.com$cojgwl $

# see also +

] http:$$ShakespeareAuthorship.com +

+ The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all `
= http:$$shakesandbacon.yolasite.com ]/

[Anonymous]

] In fact, there is so much evidence concerning `+
% Shakespeare's authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a ]
$ major problem trying to condense it all into a paper ^
% of reasonable length. |

@ Search this group "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-Author"\
^ Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author $#
# of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup, @
+ William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate %
` supported by the historical evidence.`

^ http://tinyurl.com/cojgwl |

+ see also @

\ http://ShakespeareAuthorship.com @

@ The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all #
$ http://shakesandbacon.yolasite.com ]%

[Jack Ryan]

> In fact, there is so much evidence concerning #%
^ Shakespeare's authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a >
] major problem trying to condense it all into a paper @
^ of reasonable length. \

$ Search this group "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-Author"~
@ Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author ]+
+ of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup, $
% William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate ^

# supported by the historical evidence.#

@ http://tinyurl.com/cojgwl \

% see also $

~ http://ShakespeareAuthorship.com $

$ The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all +
] http://shakesandbacon.yolasite.com >^

[graham.a...@btinternet.com]

This video sums it up much better...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3uYipLshD4

[graham.a...@btinternet.com]

This video sums it up even better...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gqoMDfPD28s

[marco]

On Thursday, March 31, 2016 at 9:52:41 AM UTC-7, graham.a...@btinternet.com wrote:
> This video sums it up even better...
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gqoMDfPD28s

.

[Morten St. George]

I had heard of the film Anonymous but never saw it. Thanks for this link; it gave me some idea of what it was about, and it makes it easy to see why the Oxfordians are in the dumps these days.

While at YouTube, I also found a pro anti-Stratfordian flick called Is Shakespeare Dead, by Keith Cutler. I highly recommend it to give a balanced view of the authorship question:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3KTCtYDxzJo

[marco]

On Sunday, April 3, 2016 at 5:34:51 PM UTC-7, Morten St. George wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 8:15:16 PM UTC-4, graham.a...@btinternet.com wrote:
> > On Thursday, 31 March 2016 00:32:43 UTC+1, Jack Ryan wrote:
> > > > In fact, there is so much evidence concerning #%
> > > ^ Shakespeare's authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a >
> > > ] major problem trying to condense it all into a paper @
> > > ^ of reasonable length. \
> > >
> > > $ Search this group "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-Author"~
> > > @ Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author ]+
> > > + of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup, $
> > > % William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate ^
> > > # supported by the historical evidence.#
> > >
> > > @ http://tinyurl.com/cojgwl \
> > >
> > > % see also $
> > >
> > > ~ http://ShakespeareAuthorship.com $
> > >
> > > $ The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all +
> > > ] http://shakesandbacon.yolasite.com >^
> >
> > This video sums it up much better...
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3uYipLshD4
>
> I had heard of the film Anonymous but never saw it. Thanks for this link; it gave me some idea of what it was about, and it makes it easy to see why the Oxfordians are in the dumps these day
>

> While at YouTube, I also found a pro anti-Stratfordian flick called Is Shakespeare Dead, by Keith Cutler. I highly recommend it to give a balanced view of the authorship question:
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3KTCtYDxzJo

i got Anonymous at my local library

i found the directors commentary a little better than the movie

marc

[graham.a...@btinternet.com]

On Monday, 4 April 2016 01:34:51 UTC+1, Morten St. George wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 8:15:16 PM UTC-4, graham.a...@btinternet.com
>

> While at YouTube, I also found a pro anti-Stratfordian flick called Is Shakespeare Dead, by Keith Cutler. I highly recommend it to give a balanced view of the authorship question:
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3KTCtYDxzJo

It does not give a balanced view of the authorship question. It merely points out what is wrong with the Stratfordian arguments. His view is totally based on the Strafordian timeline, what their view of William Shakespeare is and follows their arguments with a counter proposal.
Keir (you spelt his name wrong) Cutler and Stanley Wells (the main antagonist) are cast from the same mould. Like two brothers fighting over something they are both wrong about.
The only thing Keir is right about is how the academic world will not listen to the truth and they then call people like Cutler "crackpots".
As for Stanley Wells and Shakespeare. It's like the Devil defending Jesus.
So no wonder there are so many crackpots out there!

Check out Keir's Mulberry Tree video - for the laughs!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CoPuDQ1Vabg

Or his view on Education - how to get straight "A"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VOvMlCKfz9s

If you ask me he's still an "unthinking mimic". Probably along with the rest of the people on this site.

[marco]

,

[Abe Lincoln]

1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNS4lecOaAc

1 In fact, there is so much evidence concerning %+
> Shakespeare's authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a 1
^ major problem trying to condense it all into a paper $
> of reasonable length. ~

] Search this group "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-Author"#
$ Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author ^@
@ of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup, ]

+ William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate >

% supported by the historical evidence.%

$ http://tinyurl.com/cojgwl ~

+ see also ]

# http://ShakespeareAuthorship.com ]

] The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all @
^ http://shakesandbacon.yolasite.com 1>

[Anonymous]

~ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNS4lecOaAc

~ In fact, there is so much evidence concerning +@
^ Shakespeare's authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a $
\ major problem trying to condense it all into a paper #
^ of reasonable length. %

} Search this group "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-Author"]

# Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author \$
$ of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup, }
@ William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate ^
+ supported by the historical evidence.+

# http://tinyurl.com/cojgwl %

@ see also }

] http://ShakespeareAuthorship.com }

} The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all $
\ http://shakesandbacon.yolasite.com ~^

[Anonymous]

% https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNS4lecOaAc &

% In fact, there is so much evidence concerning +@
\ Shakespeare's authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a $
~ major problem trying to condense it all into a paper }
\ of reasonable length. %

^ Search this group "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-Author"#

} Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author ~$
$ of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup, ^
@ William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate \

+ supported by the historical evidence.+

} http://tinyurl.com/cojgwl ^

@ see also ^

# http://ShakespeareAuthorship.com ^

^ The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all $
~ http://shakesandbacon.yolasite.com %\

[marco]

.

[marco]

agree

[Jack Ryan]

& https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNS4lecOaAc &

| In fact, there is so much evidence concerning $+
~ Shakespeare's authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a #
% major problem trying to condense it all into a paper ^
* of reasonable length. |

{ Search this group "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-Author" ^

^ Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author %#
# of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup, {
+ William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate *
$ supported by the historical evidence.$

^ http://tinyurl.com/cojgwl {

+ see also {

} http://ShakespeareAuthorship.com {

{ The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all #
% http://shakesandbacon.yolasite.com |*

[Jack Ryan]

+ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNS4lecOaAc ^

& In fact, there is so much evidence concerning *$
] Shakespeare's authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a %
~ major problem trying to condense it all into a paper #
^ of reasonable length. &

+ Search this group "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-Author" #

# Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author ~%
% of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup, +
$ William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate ^
* supported by the historical evidence.*

# http://tinyurl.com/cojgwl ~

$ see also +

} http://ShakespeareAuthorship.com +

+ The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all %
~ http://shakesandbacon.yolasite.com &^

[Anonymous]

+ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNS4lecOaAc *

} In fact, there is so much evidence concerning $]
& Shakespeare's authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a ^
% major problem trying to condense it all into a paper +
* of reasonable length. }

@ Search this group "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-Author" +

+ Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author %^
^ of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup, @
] William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate *

$ supported by the historical evidence.$

+ http://tinyurl.com/cojgwl %

] see also @

# http://ShakespeareAuthorship.com @

# The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all ^
% http://shakesandbacon.yolasite.com }*

[Morten St. George]

On Saturday, October 10, 2015 at 1:41:01 PM UTC-4, Jim KQKnave wrote:
> | In fact, there is so much evidence concerning `
> ~ Shakespeare's authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a $
> * major problem trying to condense it all into a paper @
> % of reasonable length. |
>
> ^ Search this group "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-Author"=
> = Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author |
> & of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup, _
> $ William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate ~
> & supported by the historical evidence. %
>
> http://tinyurl.com/cojgwl =
>
> * see also #
>
> | http://ShakespeareAuthorship.com `
>
> ~ The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all _*
> = http://shakesandbacon.yolasite.com &*

A new film has appeared on Youtube, a recent speech by Diana Price, author of Shakespeare's Unorthodox Biography:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GEQNWpo1PSs

Highly recommended.

[graham.a...@btinternet.com]

On Saturday, 14 May 2016 13:03:18 UTC+1, Morten St. George wrote:
>
> A new film has appeared on Youtube, a recent speech by Diana Price, author of Shakespeare's Unorthodox Biography:
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GEQNWpo1PSs
>
> Highly recommended.

Boring as hell actually. She clearly hasn't even learned to say Stratford properly. It's all the same what she comes up with, blah blah blah....
It's no surprise then that the comments are disabled.

[Morten St. George]

I think they must have had you in mind when they decided to disable the comments.

[graham.a...@btinternet.com]

Excluding Shakespeare you mean?

She would feel a right prat if she found out that the real William Shakespeare was watching her video don't you think?

However it is right what she was saying about how he would have to have mastered every trade going and have knowledge of various places. Even so you don't need a university education to do anything. As the sponsor of the video Keir Cutler says. Original thinking gets in the way of passing exams, you just need to copy what the tutor says! I bet that was the same in the 16th Century as it is in the 21st!

However what she fails to take into account is the fact that NO other candidate can fill those shoes either. If they have certain skills, like many of the candidates are supposed to have, they fail on others. Exactly the same as Shakespeare would fail. Probably why the anti-Stratfordian camps can't agree on one person.
Having got the Italian book, despite the fact there are some massive assumptions in it. He does point out that a detailed knowledge of jewish customs is there in the plays. Something that none of the candidates would have. Can you even see some of these aristos even wanting a detailed knowledge of them?
The only way you can get that sort of information is by picking a huge amount of people's brains and to put it all together you need someone who will get on with everyone and cross barriers. Aristos can't do that. They have to much position and status. So you are left with someone who can slide between the camps. A middle class person!
The other thing she was on about is Shakespeare's status or job. But the problem is that the anti-stratfordians do rely on the Stratfordians for the source of information. It can be summed up as soon as they talk about the "lost years". That's a Stratfordian assumption! So why do they even give it credence? If everything else is wrong with the Stratfordian evidence of Shakespeare, why is that right?
All you need to do is exactly what I did on the Anti-Oxford site. Question the dating of the plays using Holinshed's Chronicle. That was according to them the main source of Shakespeare's plays. But there are two versions of the book. One dates to 1577 and one to 1587. But the academics say that Shakespeare only read the 1587 version. Thus the plays date after that day. But when I pointed out that the information in the 1587 version was the same as a Shakespeare play, including lines spoken by people who had died 200 years before the book came out. Which would of course would not be recorded in any document and no-one alive would remember what they said, to get the information. So I told them isn't it more likely that the book writers copied the play? However one person on the site said there was little difference the 1577 and 1587. In which case it would mean that Shakespeare DID read the 1577 edition. But that of course means that you can shove back the dating of the plays to just after 1577. And if that is the case. Many references to the plays, which were previously seen as source material by Shakespeare, actually are referring to Shakespeare plays. Meaning he was well known!
All because you can move the dates of the plays back 10 or more years. The lost years then vanish!

[marco]

agree

[marco]

yes