Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Hubris rampant

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Paul Crowley

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 8:35:45 AM11/23/09
to
" . . we have deepened our knowledge of just how such
poetic language comes to be; psychology, linguistics,
physics, and neuroscience have all come into confluence,
showing us how the human brain works � not just ours,
but those of Shakespeare and his contemporaries. . . "

http://www.cambridge.org/uk/catalogue/catalogue.asp?isbn=9780511601873&ss=exc

(Shakespeare, Computers, and the Mystery of Authorship)

Should we be pleased to see academics drop post-
modern jargon? But when they abandon that cover,
staggering levels of ignorance and stupidity become
only too obvious.

And how come they haven't recruited Peter Farey
-- for his brilliant 'maths'?


Paul.

lackpurity

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 1:08:44 AM11/24/09
to
On Nov 23, 7:35 am, Paul Crowley <dsfdsfd...@sdfsfsfs.com> wrote:
> " . . we have deepened our knowledge of just how such
> poetic language comes to be; psychology, linguistics,
> physics, and neuroscience have all come into confluence,
> showing us how the human brain works – not just ours,

> but those of Shakespeare and his contemporaries. . . "

MM:
Cambridge had the Holy Marlowe, but the inspiration for the works of
Marlowe, Shakespeare, Bacon, Donne, etc., came not from the human
brain. It came from the Holy Spirit. They used poetic language or
prose to teach mysticism.

> http://www.cambridge.org/uk/catalogue/catalogue.asp?isbn=978051160187...


>
> (Shakespeare, Computers, and the Mystery of Authorship)
>
> Should we be pleased to see academics drop post-
> modern jargon? But when they abandon that cover,
> staggering levels of ignorance and stupidity become
> only too obvious.

MM:
Mystics can teach us the truth. Unless we follow a True Mystic, we
will continue to deal with darkaness. Bible says, "How great is that
darkness!"

> And how come they haven't recruited Peter Farey
> -- for his brilliant 'maths'?
>
> Paul.

MM:
Even observing certain trends doesn't get to the meaning of what
Shakespeare wrote.

Michael Martin

0 new messages