On 12/04/2013 04:31,
metri...@gmail.com wrote:
>> The Reverend Dr Gastrell knew perfectly well
>
> ***You know this by what form of necromancy? I've
> heard that examining pigs' intestines is quite effective.
It is a conclusion. There are two broad stories
here:
(A) The Strat -- the genius of the Stratman was
known from the start, and respected by the locals
-- but not one of whom said not a word about him
for some 200 years after his death.
(B) The anti-Strat. There was no 'genius' to be
recognised, and most locals at or near his time
imagined that the Stratman had any association
with the published poet. Dr James Cooke, for
example, from Warwick, had no idea that he was
talking to the supposed daughter of the Great Bard,
when he acquired Dr Hall's notebooks from her,
nor when he later published them. He mentions
not a word about the supposed links to the
supposed fame of Dr Hall's father-in-law.
However -- local professionals (e.g. the Vicar)
would have learned from the start that there was
a subject about which they were NOT to talk --
a strange link of an illiterate local yokel to the
Great Poet. The truth of the matter would have
been passed on to each succeeding holder of
the office until the legend became fixed --
probably in the late 18th century.
Dr Gastrell's tearing down of the house would
have been a final protest in this matter.
>> that
>> the former owner of his house was an illiterate
>> yeoman, incapable of writing a word. This would
>> have been common knowledge among the well-
>> educated of the local area -- and passed on to each
>> new vicar from his predecessor. It was less than
>> 150 years since the man had died, and some of the
>> longer-lived in the parish would have known a few (of
>> the longer-lived) who had met the man when they
>> were young.
>
>>> destroyed the house in a reaction of visceral horror at this
>>> appalling crime, just as though he had discovered it to be
>>> the site of a series of horrifying murders.
>
>> Any honest person aware of the growth in
>> Bardolatry, and seeing how it was being applied
>> to a wholly undeserving, ignorant and illiterate
>> local yokel, would have been appalled. Tearing
>> down the house was an entirely fitting response
>> -- and probably the only course he felt available
>> to him.
>
> *** ...in your bizarre fantasy-world. I like to live in the real one.
So where are the memoirs? "My father knew the Bard" ?
Why the silence from Dr John Cooke, et al?
>> Nothing insane there, of course.
>
>> Whereas every one of your own suggestions as to
>> why it was done are all so overwhelmingly cogent.
>
> ***There are lots of sensible reasons for knocking down houses
The streets of many cities have often been rebuilt.
But rarely is there the kind of gap we see in Stratford.
Manifestly, there is some story here -- one that allowed
the destruction, and prevented a rebuilding at any time.
> (and petty ones, two -- did the woman who destroyed Pope's
> villa in 1808 [?] perhaps suspect that his poems were written by
> the then Lord Oxford?).
Pope was unpopular, as poets often are. Houses
linked to Byron or Shelley or Joyce or Wilde
could have seen a similar fate.
> You forget that unlike you I don't claim
> any telepathic communion with the dead.
You mean that you are incapable of forming any
kind of judgement about people's behaviour in
history -- because you are an ignorant Strat, and
there is no room for sense.
Paul.