Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Ancient *MYSTIKEL* Order Rosae Crucis
55 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted
Arthur Neuendorffer
Jan 8, 2014, 4:44:49 PM1/8/14
to
----------------------------------------------
Ancient *MYSTICAL* Order Rosae Crucis
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_Mystical_Order_Rosae_Crucis
.............................................
<<The Ancient and *MYSTICAL* Order Rosæ Crucis, also called the Rosicrucian Order (AMORC), is a worldwide philosophical and humanistic fraternal organization devoted to "the study of the elusive mysteries of life and the universe.">>
---------------------------------------------------------
http://tinyurl.com/l2mxhuo
Friday Fictioneers #8 Kingdom of the Mind
by *MYSTIKEL* , May 16, 2013
................................................
*MYSTIKEL* wrote:
<<I added the sonnet in case you were curious to know what our literary sleuths uncovered. Some believe that William Shakespeare wrote this poem (note the usage of “invented weed” similar to the line “to keep invention in a noted weed” in Sonnet 76), while others attribute it to Edward de Vere, the 17th Earl of Oxford (“My Mind To Me A Kingdom Is” is a poem attributed to Sir Edward Dyer that some believe was written by de Vere). Oxford is often cited by the sacrilegious as the man who really wrote the plays and poems of Shakespeare. However due to this sonnet’s many imperfections of meter and rhyme most authorities now believe a lesser poet wrote the poem. Some even suspect that I may have had something to do with it.>>
................................................
. What saith the world is a[U]ght to me,
. So saith they that fortun[E]’s *ENVY* breed,
. As I chase fey muse ove[R] sun spilled sea,
. My kingdom dissol[V]es in fact, in deed.
.
. From worldly act[S] come naught but trouble.
. Tis *EVER* & always a wall’s destiny to fall
. & monuments too soon collapse to rubble.
. To woo, thy muse must burn and consume all.
.
. Dare I care what di{S}solution they see
. So long soars my muse, so{U}l shackle-freed?
. By *TROTH* , what saith the wo{R}ld is all to me.
. Thus hide I my name in *invent{E}D WEED*
.
. Until those who breathe this air ha{V}e passed
. then reign o’er my kingdom of mind *{E}VER* last.
----------------------------------------------------
What an amazing piece of work, *MYSTIKEL* (a.k.a., SEEKER?) !
And to go to the trouble of creating a sonnet
...with Edward de Vere's Latin name: *VERUS*
encoded twice as Equidistant Letter Sequences:
----------------------------------------------------
____________ <= 29 =>
.
. Whatsaiththeworldisa [U] ghttomeS
. osaiththeythatfortun [E]’sENVYbre
. edAsIchasefeymuseove [R] sunspill
. edseaMykingdomdissol [V] esinfact
. indeedFromworldlyact [S] comenaug
. htbuttrouble
.
[UERVS] 29 : Prob. in first 5 lines ~ 1 in 185
..................................................
____________ <= 35 =>
.
. DareIcarewhatdi {S} solut iontheyseeSolo
. ngsoarsmymuseso {U} lshac klefreedByTROT
. Hwhatsaiththewo {R} ldisa lltomeThushide
. Imynameininvent {E} DWEED Untilthosewhob
. reathethisairha {V} epass edthenreignoer
. mykingdomofmind {E} VERla st
.
{E.VERUS} -35 : Prob. in last 6 lines ~ 1 in 3900
............................................
. Combined Prob. ~ 1 in 360,000
----------------------------------------------------
Brilliant. Totally impressed!
- Art Neuendorffer
----------------------------------------------------
nordicskiv2 wrote:
>
> It's amazing, all right -- amazingly bad.
> In fact, it's worse than Oxford's VERse!
>
> Did you read Mystikel's response, Art?:
>
> "The skip code was unintentional
> but very cool to know that it’s there!"
*MYSTIKEL* already lied about the fact that
"our literary sleuths uncoVERED" the sonnet.
Why should I believe anything else he says?
I posted The Phoenix and the Turtle [E.VERUS] skip -20
quite a while ago. Plenty of time for the Trust
to invent a counter example to either:
1) Claim such things are so easy to generate
that there should be more of them or
2) Claim that such things occur randomly all the time.
-----------------------------------------------------
- The Phoenix and the Turtle
.
. LET the bird of loudest lay,
. On the sole Arabian tree,
. Herald sad and trumpet be,
. To {.W.H. O .S.E} sound cha[S]te wings obey.
. But tho[U] shrieking harbinge[R],
. Foul precurrer of th[E] fiend,
. Augur of the *FE[V]ER'S* end,
. To this troup{E COME (t)}hou not near!
...................................
______ <= 18 =>
.
. L e t t h e b i r d o f l o u d e s
. t l a y O n t h e s o l e A r a b i
. a n t r e e H e r a l d s a d a n d
. t r u m p e t b e T o{.W.H O .S.E}s o
. u n d c h a[S]t e w i n g s o b e y
_ B u t t h o[U]s h r i e k i n g h a
_ r b i n g e[R]F o u l p r e c u r r
__e r o f t h[E]f i e n d A u g u r o
__f t h e f e[V]E.R s e n d T o t h i
. s t r o u p{E[C.O.M E(t)}h o u n o t
. n e a r
.
Prob. of *EVERUS* ~ 1/6,860
..............................................
. {E}douardus *VERUS* , [COME(s] Oxoniae,
. Vicecomes Bulbeck, Dominus de Scales
. & Badlismer, D. Magnus Angliae Ca-
. merarius: Lectori. S. D.
----------------------------------------------
Strange that the whole (modern) KJV bible lacks a single
example of [E.VERUS] with an absolute skip value of 18 or less.
nordicskiv2 wrote:
>
> Character strings like "VERUS", "EVER", "UERUS", "UERE", "VEER", "UEER",
> etc. occur *all the time* in equidistant letter sequences in all manner
> of innocuous texts, Art; their occurrence is commonplace, and they are
> not intentional.
[E.VERUS] with an absolute skip value of 35 or less
occurs just twice in the whole (modern) KJV bible:
-------------------------------------------------
Proverbs 15:2 The tongue of the wise (e.g., neufer) u[S]eth knowledge aright: b[U]t the mouth of fools pou[R]eth out foolishness. Th[E] eyes of the LORD are in e[V]ery place, beholding th[E] evil and the good.
[E.VERUS] -20
-------------------------------------------------
Lamentations 4:19 Our persecutors (e.g., dwebb) are swifter than the eagles of the heaven: they pursued us upon the mountains, they laid wait for u[S] in the wilderness. The breath of o[U]r nostrils, the anointed of the LO[R]D, was taken in their pits, of whom w[E] said, Under his shadow we shall li[V]e among the heathen. Rejoice and b[E] glad, O daughter of Edom, that dwellest in the land of Uz; the cup also shall pass through unto thee: thou shalt be drunken, and shalt make thyself naked.
[E.VERUS] -28
-------------------------------------------------
L.Frank Baum also denied that Dorothy was
"daughter that dwellest in the land of Uz"
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
In _Hamlet_ the Hermetic side is represented by Rosencrantz
----------------------------------------------------
Many Elizabethans (e.g., Edward Dyer,
Francis Bacon, John Dee & maybe William Strange)
were Rosicrucians {Rosencrantz => Rosenkreutz}
.
In Folio's 2,3, & 4 Rosencrantz was ROSINCROSS
.
[In the first Quarto ROSINCROSS is Rossen(CRAFT)!]
-------------------------------------------------------
The Masonic side is represented by Guildenstern
------------------------------------------------------
[In first Quarto (1603) Guildenstern was GILDERSTONE]
.
. Thomas Sackville, Lord Buckhurst, (1536-1608) was
the English dramatist that paved the way for Shakespeare.
. Sackville was Grandmaster Freemason (1561-1567)
. {Freemason => Stone Guild => Guildensteen}
------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.dartmouth.edu/~milton/reading_room/on_shakespeare/index.shtml
..............................................................
<<"On Shakespear" was Milton's first published poem, appearing
anonymously in the second folio of plays by Shakespeare (1632).
There it bears the title, "An Epitaph on the admirable
Dramaticke Poet, W.SHAKESPEARE" but has no attribution.
...........................................................
On Shakespeare. 1630 by John Milton
What needs my Shakespear for his honour'd Bones,
The labour of an age in PILED STONES,
Or that his hallow'd reliques should be hid
Under a Star-ypointing Pyramid?
Dear son of memory, great heir of Fame,
What need'st thou such weak witnes of {THY NAME}?
Thou in our [W]onder and aston[I]shment
Hast bui[L]t thy self a live-[L]ong Monument.
---------------------------------------------------
____ <= 14 =>
.
. W h a t n e e d s m y S h a
. k e s p e a r f o r h i s h
. o n o u r d B o n e s T h e
. l a b o u r o f a n a g e i
. n p i l e d S t o n e s O r
. t h a t h i s h a l l o w d
. r e l i q u e s s h o u l d
. b e h i d U n d e r a S t a
. r y p o i n t i n g P y r a
. m i d D e a r s o n o f m e
. m o r y g r e a t h e i r o
. f F a m e W h a t n e e d s
. t t h o u s u c h w e a k w
.............................................
. i t n e s o f {T H Y {N} A M E}
. T h o u i n o u r [W]{O} n d e
. r a n d a s t o n [I]{S} h m e
. n t H a s t b u i [L]{T} t h y
. s e l f a l i v e [L]{O} n g M
. o n u m e n t
............................................
[WILL] 14
{OSTO} 14: "I stand in the way" (Italian)
{NOST} 14: "Knowest not." [Obs.] Chaucer.
...............................................
"Ye," seyde he,"thow {NOST} what thou menest"
from _Book Of The Duchesse_ by Geoffrey Chaucer.
----------------------------------------------
_____ *NOT (E)D WEED*
.............................................
_______ Sonnet 76 (1609)
.
____ <= 14 =>
. W h y i s m y v e r s e s o
. b a r r e n o f n e w p r i
. d e? S o f a r f r o m v a r
. i a t i o n o r q u i c <K> e
. *C H A N G E* W h y w i t h t
. h e t i m e d o <I> n o t g l
. a n c e a s i d e [T] o n e w
. f o u n (D) m e t h o d s, a n
. d t o c o m p o u n d s S T
. {R} A N G E [W] h y w r i t e I
. s t i l l a l l o n e E V E
. R {T} h e s a m e [A] n d k (E)(E)
. p e i n v (E){N}{T} i o n i n a
.............................................
. *N O T (E) D W (E) E D* T h {A}{T} E
. V E R y w o r <D>[D] O t h a l
. m o {S}{T} F E L m [Y] N a m {E} S
. h e w i n g t {H}[E]<I> r b i r
. t h a n d w h e [R] e t h {E} y
. (D) i d p r o c e [E] d O <K> n o
. w s w e {E} t l o [V] e I a l w
. a i e s w r i t [E] o f y o u
. A n d y o u a n [D] l (O) v (E) a
. r e s t <I> l l m Y a {R}<G>(U) m
. (E) n t S o a l l m y b <E> s t
. (I) s (D) r e s s i n g o <L> d w
. o r (D) s n e w S p e [N]<D> i n
. g a {G} a (I) n (E) w h a t i s a
. l r (E) a [D] y (S) p (E) n t F o r
. a s t h (E) S u n (I) s (D) a [I] l
. y n e w a n (D) o l d (S) o (I) s
. m y l o v e [S] t (I) l l t e l
. l i n g w h a t i s t o l d,
..................................................
[DEVERE] -14 {Found by James Ferris}
[DEVERE] Prob. in this Sonnet skip < 15
. [in perfect 14 x 32 array] ~ 1 in 2000
.
[DYER,E(dweed)] 14
.
[DYEREVED] 14 Prob. skip < 15 ~ 1 in 450,000
Prob. in perfect array skip < 15 ~ 1 in 1,150,000
..................................................
Edward de Vere & Edward Dyer:
.
1) Only two Shakespeare authorship candidates
. named Edward: http://tinyurl.com/6yqvqwz
.
2) Only two Shakespeare authorship candidates
. sharing yet another authorship controversy:
-----------------------------------------------------
Ancient Mystical Order Rosae Crucis
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_Mystical_Order_Rosae_Crucis
.............................................
<<The Ancient and Mystical Order Rosæ Crucis, also called the Rosicrucian Order (AMORC), is a worldwide philosophical and humanistic fraternal organization devoted to "the study of the elusive mysteries of life and the universe." The current open cycle of AMORC was activated by Harvey Spencer Lewis in 1915. Lewis received authority to do so from the Supreme Council of the Rosicrucian Order after being tried, tested and finally initiated into the Order in 1909, Toulouse, France. AMORC is said to be the modern day manifestation of the ancient Rose-Croix Order which has its origin in the Ancient Egyptian mystery schools.
AMORC's teachings draw upon ideas of the major philosophers, particularly Pythagoras, Thales, Solon, Heraclitus, Democritus. The teachings are divided into Degrees which are further grouped into broad categories under titles such as Postulant, Neophyte and Initiate sections. These degrees cover various fields related to physical, mental, psychic and spiritual existence such as physics, metaphysics, biology, psychology, parapsychology, comparative religion, traditional healing techniques, health, intuition, extrasensory perception, material and spiritual alchemy, meditation, sacred architecture, symbolism, and that mystical state of consciousness relating to the experience of unity with the Divine.
The name AMORC is an abbreviation for the Latin title Antiquus Mysticusque Ordo Rosæ Crucis ("Ancient and Mystic Order of the Rosy Cross") Harvey Spencer Lewis, an author, occultist and mystic who founded AMORC in the United States of America, wrote that "from the very start, and with the issuance of the first public manifesto, the correct name of the international Rosicrucian organization was used, namely, the Ancient and Mystical Order Rosae Crucis. This is a slightly abbreviated form of the original Latin name, Antiquus Arcanus Ordo Rosae Rubeae et Aureae Crucis, and the initials AMORC were immediately used as well as the true and original symbol of the Rosicrucian Order — the golden cross with but one red rose in the center."
Organization and structure
AMORC is a worldwide organization, established in the United States of America as a nonprofit 501(c)(3) public benefit corporation, with the specific and primary purpose of advancing the knowledge of its history, principles, and teachings for charitable, educational, and scientific purposes. It is financed mainly through fees paid by its members. Income is used by the organization to pay expenses, develop new programs, expand services, and carry out educational work.
The organizational headquarters for different jurisdictions of the AMORC are designated as "Grand Lodges." The English-speaking Grand Lodge for the Americas is headquartered in Rosicrucian Park in San Jose, California. All Grand Lodges are governed by The Supreme Grand Lodge of AMORC. The Supreme Grand Lodge meets annually, often in Lachute, Quebec, Canada (however, in August 2009 the Supreme Board met in Toulouse, France, in honor of the 100th Anniversary of H. Spencer Lewis's initiation there), and is responsible for the worldwide coordination of AMORC, the establishment of new administrations, and the appointment of jurisdictions to Grand Lodges, usually based on language. This body consists of the Imperator, Grand Masters, and related executive officers.
On a local level, members of AMORC often form smaller affiliated groups organized as Lodges, Chapters, Pronaoi, or Atrium Groups. These various titles differ according to the number of members of each body in regular attendance. Participation in these groups is optional, and participants retain compulsory membership with their respective Grand Lodge. Many of these groups charge additional dues to participants to cover expenses such as rent and mailings. Most affiliated bodies of the AMORC offer Open Meetings or Lectures to which the general public is invited and welcome.
Each AMORC Grand Lodge has its own headquarters and facilities. In North America, the largest Chapter in the world is located at 1342 Naglee Ave. ; the headquarters of the English Grand Lodge for the Americas owns the Rosicrucian Park in San Jose, California, founded in 1927, which includes the Rosicrucian Egyptian Museum, the fifth planetarium built in the USA (and the first to have a US-built star projector, built by Dr. Harvey Spencer Lewis), the Rosicrucian Peace Garden, Rosicrucian Research Library, Grand Temple, Administration Building, Fountain Plaza and Gardens.
In 1909 Harvey Spencer Lewis visited France in search of Rosicrucians, was duly initiated in Toulouse, France, and given the mandate to establish an order in North America. After further qualification and preparation the first official Manifesto was issued in the United States in 1915, announcing the establishment of Rosicrucian activity in America. May Banks-Stacy, the co-founder of AMORC, was said to be one of the last successors to the original colony of Rosicrucians that settled in America during the late 17th century, and an initiate of the Rosicrucians of the East. Lewis became a "secret partner" of Big Business in America.[7] According to railroad magnate Arthur Stillwell, no other man has exerted a greater influence as a secret partner in American free enterprise than Lewis. Walt Disney was once a member of AMORC as was Star Trek creator Gene Roddenberry and Jack Palance's daughter Holly Palance.
AMORC headquarters were located in New York City, San Francisco, and then Tampa before moving to San Jose, California, in 1927. Harvey Spencer Lewis died in 1939 and, in accordance with wishes stipulated in his will, was succeeded in the Office of Imperator by his son Ralph Maxwell Lewis who had previously served as Supreme Secretary. Gary L. Stewart who previously served as Grand Master of the English-Speaking jurisdiction and then Vice President of the Board of Directors was appointed to the Office of Imperator upon Lewis' death in 1987 in compliance with Lewis' wishes. Christian Bernard who had been the Grand Master of France and then succeeded Stewart to the position of Vice President of the Board was elected to the Office of Imperator in 1990 by the Board of Directors.
During World War II AMORC underwent a dramatic period of growth. After the war ended AMORC was able to lend support to its European sister organizations. Eventually many of these then came under the administration of AMORC's leadership in San Jose. 2009, the centennial year of H. Spencer Lewis's initiation in Toulouse, saw growth in membership in the English Grand Lodge for the Americas and very active participation in on-line activities including Facebook, Twitter, online Discussion groups, a social networking site, podcasts and Rosicrucian TV on YouTube. Rosicrucian Park in San Jose received many improvements as well, including the completion of accessibility upgrades to the museum, planetarium and grounds and the installation of sustainable native plant gardens.
AMORC uses traditional history, consisting of tales and legends represented as having been passed down for centuries by word of mouth as well as the conventional chronological history, which consists of verifiable fact. AMORC traces its origin to mystery schools established in Egypt during the joint reign of Pharaoh Thutmose III and Hatshepsut, about 1500 BCE. They united the priesthoods of Egypt into a single order under the leadership of Hatshepsut's Vizier, Hapuseneb. Each Temple had its associated Per Ankh (House of Life) where the Mysteries were handed down.[11] In uniting the priesthoods, the Per Ankhu were also united. These schools were formed to probe into "the mysteries of life" — in other words, natural phenomena, and initiatic spirituality.[12] AMORC also claims that among their most esteemed pupils were Pharaoh Akhenaten (Amenhotep IV) and his wife Nefertiti.
Over centuries these Mystery Schools spread into Greece and thence into Rome. During the Middle Ages they were concealed under various names. AMORC claims that Rosicrucianism is mentioned as far back as 1115 CE in a book of the collection of Brother Omnis Moriar in Germany. However, no other record of such a brother and book has appeared. The alleged name probably derives from the opening words of Horace in Ode 3.30 in which he writes: “Non Omnis Moriar” (“I shall not completely die”).
Rosicrucianism rose to considerable prominence in Europe during the 17th century following the publication and wide circulation of a small pamphlet, the Fama Fraternitatis. AMORC scholars have suggested that Rosicrucians first came to America in the area of present day Carmel-by-the-Sea, California in The Vizcaíno Expedition of 1602–1603. AMORC maintains that the next Rosicrucian expedition came in the chartered vessel Sarah Maria during the early months of 1694 under the leadership of Grand Master Johannes Kelpius and they established a colony in what is now Fairmount Park, Philadelphia. They finally settled on the banks of the Wissahickon. "In that retired valley beside the flowing brook the secret rites and mysteries of the true Rosicrucian Philosophy flourished unmolested for years, until the state of affairs brought about by the American Revolution, together with pernicious Sunday legislation which also discriminated against the keepers of the scriptural Sabbath day, gradually caused the incoming generation to assimilate with the secular congregations." This is disputed by another organization, the Fraternity of the Rosy Cross at one time headed by Dr. R. Swinburne Clymer. Johannes Kelpius of the Jacob Boehme Lodge in Germany led the German Pietists to America and these Rosicrucian immigrants and their descendants established a commune in 1732 at Ephrata, Pennsylvania known as the Ephrata Society under the leadership of Johann Conrad Beissel and Peter Miller (who at the behest of Congress translated the Declaration of Independence into seven languages); the buildings still exist today as part of a historical park known as Ephrata Cloisters. It is also a fact that the two rival organizations historically disputed their claims to Rosicrucian genuineness.
From 1915 to 1990 the leadership of AMORC was entrusted to the Office of an Imperator who was solely responsible for all doctrine and ritual of the Order as well as a corporate president who sat at the head of the board of directors, which was responsible for determining all corporate matters related to the organization. When AMORC reorganized in April, 1990, the dual function of the Office was merged into one position, that of President of the worldwide AMORC organization. However, internally, the President was still referred to by the traditional title of Imperator. In addition to the Imperator, each Grand Lodge has a Grand Master.
The governance of AMORC is overseen by the Supreme Grand Lodge (the Imperator, Grand Masters and Administrators), with local (geographic and/or language based) Grand Lodges throughout the world.
This is a list of people who, according to AMORC, were Rosicrucians or associated with Rosicrucian tradition and work.[citation needed]
Isaac Newton
Leonardo da Vinci
Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa
Dante Alighieri
René Descartes
Blaise Pascal
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz
Christopher Wren
Benjamin Franklin
Thomas Jefferson
Michael Faraday
Claude Debussy
Erik Satie
Édith Piaf
Napoleon Bonaparte
Francis Bacon
------------------------------------------------------
Just hotbeds of Rosicrucianism:
.
"that there is no country in the world that is so favourably
disposed towards the Brethren of the Rose Cross as Holland"
.
There was a centre of Rosicrucians in Amsterdam in 1622
------------------------------------------
http://home.planet.nl/~amorc.nl/enhistne.html
.
<<It seems that Nicolas Barnaud was in Holland in 1591 and there
united Rosicrucians around him. With Semler mention is made of a
Societas of Isaäcus Hollandus as the mother society of the German
Rosicrucians, who in 1592 gathered together. There were two affiliated
scientists, father and son, both named Isaäc. The father made a number
of discoveries and among other things constructed a rEVERbEer-oven for
metal working. Together father and son published some ten works about
chemistry, alchemy, botany, et cetera from which later Paracelsus and
Boyle have drawn. In 1601 Barnaud in Gouda addressed the Hermetic
Masters.
.
Sorbière, who lived in Holland for a long time and tried to get in
touch with the Rosicrucians everywhere, wrote among other things:
"that there is no country in the world that is so favourably disposed
towards the Brethren of the Rose Cross as Holland, where those who
know the secret of the great work enjoy so much freedom." Another
writer says, that in 1622 there were centres of Rosicrucians in
Amsterdam and in The Hague, the members of which belonged to the
distinguished classes, meeting in a palace. He also mentioned centres
in Neurenberg, Erfurt, Hamburg, Dantzig, Mantua and Venice. The
interest in the study of natural philosophy in Holland was so great,
that Irenaeus Agnostus in 1619 in Dordrecht published his Regula
Vitae, in which he highly spoke of the "hochberühmte tugendhaften
Fraternität des R.C." (the highly renowned virtuous Fraternity of the
R.C.). The famous Englishman Robert C. Fludd in 1616 at Leyden
published his Tractatus Apologeticus integritatem Societas de Rosae
Crucis. In 1615 a Dutch translation of the Fama Fraternitatis R.C.
came out, which translation was written by Abraham von Hoberweschel.
Holland was thé country of the freedom of thought. Already Coornhert
(1522-1590) - the principal leader of the Rhetoricians, the humanist,
who alternately was persecuted by Roman Catholics and Protestants -
had tried to reconcile the Cross with the Rose, as Mr. F. Wittemans
expresses it. In Holland there was a great number of ideological
groupings. The syncretists and alchemists even enjoyed the protection
of the stadtholders (viceregents). Barnaud openly introduced Maurits
as their protector. Also prince Frederik Hendrik, who was favourably
disposed towards scientists and had been introduced at Cassel in the
R.C.chapter, took the Fratres under his protection. Besides Amsterdam
and The Hague also Warmond was mentioned as the centre of R.C.
activities. Warmond by the way was known as a centre of secularism. >>
--------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.rosicrucian-order.com/principal.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.sacred-texts.com/eso/sta/sta33.htm
.
<<A great number of scholars and philosophers,
among them Sir Francis Bacon & Wolfgang von Goethe,
have been suspected of affiliation with the R(osicrucian) O(rder)>>
....................................................
THE CREST OF JOHANN VALENTIN ANDREÆ.
http://www.sacred-texts.com/eso/sta/img/14000.jpg
....................................................
<<The reference to four red roses and a white cross in the Chymical
Marriage of Christian Rosencreutz identified Johann Valentin Andreæ as
its author, for his family crest, shown above, consisted of four red
roses and a white cross.>>
-------------------------------------------------------
__ \_*_/
__ _\_/
__ * _X * Edward de Vere, Erle of Oxenford was buryed
__ _/_\ __________ the 6th daye of Julye Å 1604
__ _/ *_\
.
<<The strange, large 'X' type symbol appears to have been put there
much later. According to Paul Altrocchi, this must have happened
many decades later "...since pencils withsuch a sharp point did
not appear until the late 1600's." It really is anybody's guess
who put it there - perhaps an over-enthusiastic Oxfordian?>>
- _The Death of Edward de Vere_ by Michael Llewellyn
-----------------------------------------------
1604 WHITgift dies on February 29th.
1604 1000th anniversary of St.Augustine's death.
1604 Tomb of Christian Rosenkreutz discovered.
1604 Hamlet published
1604 FAMA Fraternitatis published
1604 Tragical History of Doctor Faustus (V1) published
1604 Oxford dies on the Feastday of John the Baptist.
1604 Kepler's NOVA/AVON.
1604 Susan marries Pembroke on the Feastday of John the Devine
---------------------------------------------------
Goethe's poem :"The Mysteries," in which Brother Mark
is guided to the Temple where the Rose Cross is on the door.
-----------------------------------------------
J.W. von Goethe: _Wilhelm Meister's Apprenticeship_
. Book II Chapter X
.
WHEN our friends began to think of going home, they looked about them
for their clergyman; but he had vanished, and was nowhere to be found.
.
'It is not polite in the man, who otherwise displayed
good breeding,' said Madam Melina, 'to desert a company
that welcomed him so kindly, without taking leave.'
'I have all the time been thinking,' said Laertes,
'where I can have seen this singular man before.
I fully intended to ask him about it at parting.'
'I too had the same feeling,' said Wilhelm, 'and certainly
I should not have let him go, till he had told us something
more about his circumstances. I am much mistaken
if I have not ere now spoken with him somewhere.'
'And you may in truth,' said Philina, 'be mistaken there.
This person seems to have the air of an acquaintance,
because he looks like a man, and not like *JACK or KIT* '
'What is this?' said Laertes. 'Do not we two look like men?'
'I know what I am saying,? cried Philina;
'and if you cannot understand me, nEVER mind. In the end
my words will be found to require no commentary.'
---------------------------------------------
. Beaumont and Fletcher. Philaster.
. Act the Fifth Scene IV
.
1ST CIT.: I'll have a leg, that's certain.
2ND CIT.: I'll have an arm.
3RD CIT.: I'll have his nose, and at mine own charge
. build a college and clap't upon the gate.
4TH CIT.: I'll have his little gut to string a *KIT* with;
. For certainly a royal gut will sound like silVER.
---------------------------------------------
. sudore non supore - by labour not sleep
.......................................
. http://www.st-ives.info/
.
As I was going to St Ives I met a man with seven wives.
Each wife had seven sacks, Each sack had seven cats,
Each cat had seven KITs;
KITs, cats, sacks and wives -
How many were going to St Ives?
--------------------------------------------
____*OXENFORD*
.
____*R.O. : FOX DEN*
____*R(osicrucian) O(rder) : FOX DEN*
.
____*KITS*
----------------------------------------------
Peter Bull's 14 letter *TIK-KITM-MARL-LOW*
is somewhat less impressive but quite similar
to John Rollett's 15 letter discovery of
*HENRY-WR-IOTH-ESLEY* in the Sonnets
dedication (: i.e., a name closely associated with
William Shakespeare which is broken into 4 pieces).
.
Rollett's solution is clearly statistically significant
in its own right. Peter Bull's *TIK-KITM-MARL-LOW*
is probably statistically significant as well given
the apriori existence & legitimacy of Rollett's find.
---------------------------------------------------
[T]hou wilt restore, to be my comfort still:
[I]s't not enough to torture me alone,
[K]nowing thy heart torments me with disdain,
[I]f Nature, sovereign mistress over WRACK, [short sonnet!]
[T]o weigh how once I suffered in your crime.
[M]ine eye well knows what with his gust is 'greeing,
[A]nd peace proclaims olives of endless age.
[R]eturn, forgetful Muse, and straight redeem
[L]ike a deceived husband; so love's face
[O]f faults conceal'd, wherein I am attainted,
[W]hen others would give life and bring a TOMB.
--------------------------------------------------
(W)hy of eyes' falsehood hast thou forged hooks,
(I)n things of great receipt with ease we prove
(S)hall Will in others seem right gracious,
(H)e learn'd but surety-like to write for me
.
Sonnet 135: WhoEVER hath her *WISH* , thou hast thy 'Will,'
.
. King Lear Act 2, Scene 4
.
REGAN: so will you *WISH ON* me,
.
. Measure for Measure Act 2, Scene 1
.
FROTH: I nEVER come into any room in a *TAP-house*
. but I am drawn in.
-------------------------------------------------
Philip Massinger: _A New Way to Pay Old Debts_
. Act I Scene I
.
[Enter] TAPWELL, WELLBORN [in tattered apparel,] and FROTH
.
TAP. [to his wife.] Cry out for help!
.
WELL. Stir, and thou diest:
Your potent prince, the constable, shall not save you.
Hear me ungrateful hell-hound! Did not I
Make purses for you? Then you lick?d my boots,
And thought your holiday cloak too coarse to clean them.
?Twas I that, when I heard thee swear if ever
Thou couldst arrive at forty pounds thou wouldst
Live like an emperor, ?twas I that gave it
In ready gold. Deny this, wretch!
.
TAP. I must, sir;
For, from the tavern to the *TAPhouse* , all,
On forfeiture of their licenses, stand bound
Ne?er to remember who their best guests were,
If they grew poor like you.
.
WELL. They are well rewarded
That beggar themselves to make such cuckolds rich.
--------------------------------------------
http://shakespeareauthorship.com/cipher/bmarlowe1.html
.
. <= 12 =>
.
137 T T T Y I B(W)W W W O T
136 I S A T W I(I)A T T F T
135 W A M T W N(S)A T A S O
134 S A M[T]B F(H)V T T A S
133 B F[I]B M A[O]A P B W T
132 T[K]H L A B[N]D A O T A
131 T A F T Y T(T)A A A O T
130 M C[I I}I B(A)T I T I M
129 T I{I}S I P(P)O M H A B
128 H V W[T]D{T)W A T A O M
127 I O B A F F S B T H A S
126 O D W{T|I]A S M Y S H A
125 W W O W H L F P N A W B
124 Y I A W N I V W I W B T
123 N T T T O W A T T N F M
122 T F W B O H T O T N T T
121 T W A N F G O W N A I B
120 T A N V F A A[T]O M A T
119 W D A S W W H I O T A G
118 L W A W E T A T T T A W
117 A W F W T A T W B A B B
116 L A W O O T I W L W L B
115 T E Y M B C T D A M W C
114 O D O A T S C A O A[M]A
113 S A D S F O O N F T T T
112 Y W F S Y T N T I O T M
111 O T T T T A T P W P N N
110 A A G M M A T A N M O A
109 O T A A T L I S N A T T
108 W W W T N I C E S W N B
107 N O C S T A I[A]N M S W
106 W I A I T O I E S O A T
105 L N S T K S T O F F A T
104 T F S H T I T S A S S H
103 A T T T O L T D W T F T
102 M I T T O W A A N T B A
101 O F B S M T B B B E T A
100 W T S D[R]I S A R I I A
.99 T S I W I T A T O A A B
.98 F W H T Y O C O N N T D
.97 H F W W A T B L Y B F A
.96 S S B T A T S T H I H I
.95 H W D O T M C N O W W A
.94 T T W V T A T O T T B T
.93 S[L]M T F T I I B T W T
.92 B F A F T W I T T S O H
.91 S S S S A W B A T R O A
.90 T N I A A C G T I W B A
.89 S A S A T T A I B T L A
.88 W A V A W V[O]T A F T D
.87 F A T M F A T A T O S C
.86 W B T M W A N G H W A I
.85 M W R A I A T I H A B T
.84 W T I W L T B T L N A M
.83 I A I T A T H S T W F[W]
----------------------------------
Recalculated for first 12 lines:
-------------------------------------------
*KITM-MARL-LOW* probability ~ 1/760
----------------------------------------------------
Consider the "Bull Sonnets Acrostic Array" at Terry's site:
http://shakespeareauthorship.com/cipher/bmarlowe1.html
.
Use a 'String Find' to count (in first 12 columns):
.
. 4 K's
. 68 M's
. 41 L's
.
. This automatically gives:
.
. 4 x 68 "K-M" pairs and
. 68 x 41 "M-L" pairs
.
However, each "K**M" or "M**L" 4 LETTER string
must be separated by multiples of 3 rows & 3 columns
.
Hence, the [E]xpected [V]alue number of interesting
. "K**M" or "M**L" 4 LETTER strings
. in the Bull array
.
. "K**M" E.V.: ~ 4*68/(3*3) ~ 30
. "M**L" E.V.: ~ 67*41/(3*3) ~ 305
-------------------------------------------------
Now use 'String Find' {e.g., on "I T" & "T I"}
.to count (for whole 14 lines):
.
50 "IT"s (left right pairs out of ~ 4000)
.8 "AR"s (left right pairs out of ~ 4000)
31 "OW"s (left right pairs out of ~ 4000)
.
. "IT" probability: 50/4000
. "AR" probability: 8/4000
. "OW" probability: 31/4000
--------------------------------------------
. Now applying the
.
"IT" prob: 50/4000 = 1/80
"AR" prob: 8/4000 = 1/500
.
. to the [E]xpected [V]alue of interesting
. "K**M" or "M**L" 4 LETTER strings
.
gives [E]xpected [V]alue of
.
. "KITM" E.V. = 30 / 80
. "MARL" E.V.= 305 / 500
.
Hence one would be lucky to expect ONE of each
(which presumeably is what Peter Bull found)
----------------------------------------------
However, one would NOT expect these
. two (expected) 4 LETTER strings:
"KITM" & "MARL" to share the SAME "M"!
.
. For these two strings to share the SAME "M"
.
"KITM-MARL" E.V.: 30*305/(80*500*68) ~ 1/297
------------------------------------------------------
The additional of "LOW" adds a little bit more to this:
--------------------------------------------------
Given the prior spacings in "KITM" & "MARL"
it would be reasonable to look for the "O"
. of the "OW" pair in one of 62 positions:
.
. [L]M T F T I I
. F A F T W I T
. S S S A W B A
. N I A A C G T
. A S A T T A I
. A V A W V[O]T
. A T M F A T A
. B T M W A N G
. W R A I A T I
.
Only one "[O]W" is found out of 62.
.
. How does this compare with and
. expected "OW" prob: ~31/4000?
-----------------------------------------
. Fisher's Exact Test
http://www.matforsk.no/ola/fisher.htm
.
. TABLE = [ 1 , 61 , 31 , 3970 ]
2-Tail : p-value = 0.38980385512773885
-----------------------------------------
. So the [E]xpected [V]alue of
. the final "OW" is ~0.39
.
"KITM-MARL-LOW" probability: 0.39/297 ~ 1/760
.
A respectable if not overly impressive number in itself.
------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Bull points out:
.
<<1 The beginning of the message is very clearly signposted. The
K forming the first letter of the message is the starting point of no
less than five regularly formed KITs, one of which appears in adjacent
squares and all of which are straight-line examples, with left to
right orientation and tight letter spacing. This KIT node is 'highly
anomalous' in the grid. It is eye-catching. Its occurence is highly
unlikely to be the product of random forces.
.
2. The line of the message as it unfolds from the initial K is
also indicated because the KITM of the first section is exactly
superimposed on a seperate KIT line. This is a signal of its
intentionality. It is an anomaly compounded.>>
-----------------------------------------------------
So what about the four other "regularly formed KITs"
.
. The pertinent I's lie within the 25 spaces
. of a half-diamond surrounding the K in "KITM":
.
. S
. A M
. A M[T]
. F[I]B M
. [K]H L A B
. A F T Y
. C[I I}
. I{I}
. V [T] {T}
.
. {T}
.
. So 4 of these 25 spaces produce
. the "I" for a "KIT" while 19 do not
. [; ignoring the "K" & "T"]
.
Compare this with the 50 "IT"s found in ~ 4000
. left right pairs in the "Bull array":
---------------------------------------------
. Fisher's Exact Test
http://www.matforsk.no/ola/fisher.htm
.
. TABLE = [ 4 , 19 , 50 , 3950 ]
2-Tail : p-value = 0.00021257190299677967
-----------------------------------------------
Therefore there is only ~ 1/4700!! probability
. for this close clustering of 4 "KIT"s!
----------------------------------------------
Hence, the chance of "KITM-MARL-LOW"
. PLUS 4 close "KIT"s
.
. ~ 1/(760 x 4700) ~1/3,600,000!!!
----------------------------------------------------
http://www.masoncode.com/Great%20Seal%20Sonnets.htm
As an Oxfordian the base 17 pyramid is ideal!
-----------------------------------------------
A nice pattern emerges if
the sonnets are written out in
boustrophedon "ox path" style:
..................................................
*Under a STAR-Y-pointing PYRAMID* -- Milton (1630)
.
---------- *SONET EYES*
...
---------------- * 154
--------------- 0 0 153
-------------- 0 * * 151
------------- 0 * * * 148
------------ 0 0 Y * * 144
----------- 0 * 0 * * * 139
---------- 0 * * 0 * 0 0 133
-------------------------------------------
--------- * * * * 0 * 0 * 125
-------- * * * * 0 0 * * * 117
------- * * 0 * 0 * * * * * 108
------ 0 * * * * 0 * 0 * * * 98
----- * * * * 0 * 0 * * 0 * * 87
---- * * * * * * 0 * * * * * * 75
--- 0 0 * * * * 0 0 * * * * * 0 62
-- * * * * * * * * * 0 * * 0 0 * 48
- 0 * 0 0 0 * * * 0 0 0 * * 0 * 0 33
. 0 0 * * 0 * 0 * 0 * * * * 0 * 0 0 17
----------------------------------------------------
What needs my Shakespeare for his honour'd bones,
The labour of an age in piled *STONES* ,
.....................................
_____*STONES*
_____{anagram}
_____*SONETS*
.....................................
Or that his hallow'd relics should be hid
*Under a STAR-Y-pointing PYRAMID* ?
Dear son of memory, great heir of fame,
What need'st thou such weak witness of thy name?
------------------------------------------
Art Neuendorffer
Ancient *MYSTICAL* Order Rosae Crucis
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_Mystical_Order_Rosae_Crucis
.............................................
<<The Ancient and *MYSTICAL* Order Rosæ Crucis, also called the Rosicrucian Order (AMORC), is a worldwide philosophical and humanistic fraternal organization devoted to "the study of the elusive mysteries of life and the universe.">>
---------------------------------------------------------
http://tinyurl.com/l2mxhuo
Friday Fictioneers #8 Kingdom of the Mind
by *MYSTIKEL* , May 16, 2013
................................................
*MYSTIKEL* wrote:
<<I added the sonnet in case you were curious to know what our literary sleuths uncovered. Some believe that William Shakespeare wrote this poem (note the usage of “invented weed” similar to the line “to keep invention in a noted weed” in Sonnet 76), while others attribute it to Edward de Vere, the 17th Earl of Oxford (“My Mind To Me A Kingdom Is” is a poem attributed to Sir Edward Dyer that some believe was written by de Vere). Oxford is often cited by the sacrilegious as the man who really wrote the plays and poems of Shakespeare. However due to this sonnet’s many imperfections of meter and rhyme most authorities now believe a lesser poet wrote the poem. Some even suspect that I may have had something to do with it.>>
................................................
. What saith the world is a[U]ght to me,
. So saith they that fortun[E]’s *ENVY* breed,
. As I chase fey muse ove[R] sun spilled sea,
. My kingdom dissol[V]es in fact, in deed.
.
. From worldly act[S] come naught but trouble.
. Tis *EVER* & always a wall’s destiny to fall
. & monuments too soon collapse to rubble.
. To woo, thy muse must burn and consume all.
.
. Dare I care what di{S}solution they see
. So long soars my muse, so{U}l shackle-freed?
. By *TROTH* , what saith the wo{R}ld is all to me.
. Thus hide I my name in *invent{E}D WEED*
.
. Until those who breathe this air ha{V}e passed
. then reign o’er my kingdom of mind *{E}VER* last.
----------------------------------------------------
What an amazing piece of work, *MYSTIKEL* (a.k.a., SEEKER?) !
And to go to the trouble of creating a sonnet
...with Edward de Vere's Latin name: *VERUS*
encoded twice as Equidistant Letter Sequences:
----------------------------------------------------
____________ <= 29 =>
.
. Whatsaiththeworldisa [U] ghttomeS
. osaiththeythatfortun [E]’sENVYbre
. edAsIchasefeymuseove [R] sunspill
. edseaMykingdomdissol [V] esinfact
. indeedFromworldlyact [S] comenaug
. htbuttrouble
.
[UERVS] 29 : Prob. in first 5 lines ~ 1 in 185
..................................................
____________ <= 35 =>
.
. DareIcarewhatdi {S} solut iontheyseeSolo
. ngsoarsmymuseso {U} lshac klefreedByTROT
. Hwhatsaiththewo {R} ldisa lltomeThushide
. Imynameininvent {E} DWEED Untilthosewhob
. reathethisairha {V} epass edthenreignoer
. mykingdomofmind {E} VERla st
.
{E.VERUS} -35 : Prob. in last 6 lines ~ 1 in 3900
............................................
. Combined Prob. ~ 1 in 360,000
----------------------------------------------------
Brilliant. Totally impressed!
- Art Neuendorffer
----------------------------------------------------
nordicskiv2 wrote:
>
> It's amazing, all right -- amazingly bad.
> In fact, it's worse than Oxford's VERse!
>
> Did you read Mystikel's response, Art?:
>
> "The skip code was unintentional
> but very cool to know that it’s there!"
*MYSTIKEL* already lied about the fact that
"our literary sleuths uncoVERED" the sonnet.
Why should I believe anything else he says?
I posted The Phoenix and the Turtle [E.VERUS] skip -20
quite a while ago. Plenty of time for the Trust
to invent a counter example to either:
1) Claim such things are so easy to generate
that there should be more of them or
2) Claim that such things occur randomly all the time.
-----------------------------------------------------
- The Phoenix and the Turtle
.
. LET the bird of loudest lay,
. On the sole Arabian tree,
. Herald sad and trumpet be,
. To {.W.H. O .S.E} sound cha[S]te wings obey.
. But tho[U] shrieking harbinge[R],
. Foul precurrer of th[E] fiend,
. Augur of the *FE[V]ER'S* end,
. To this troup{E COME (t)}hou not near!
...................................
______ <= 18 =>
.
. L e t t h e b i r d o f l o u d e s
. t l a y O n t h e s o l e A r a b i
. a n t r e e H e r a l d s a d a n d
. t r u m p e t b e T o{.W.H O .S.E}s o
. u n d c h a[S]t e w i n g s o b e y
_ B u t t h o[U]s h r i e k i n g h a
_ r b i n g e[R]F o u l p r e c u r r
__e r o f t h[E]f i e n d A u g u r o
__f t h e f e[V]E.R s e n d T o t h i
. s t r o u p{E[C.O.M E(t)}h o u n o t
. n e a r
.
Prob. of *EVERUS* ~ 1/6,860
..............................................
. {E}douardus *VERUS* , [COME(s] Oxoniae,
. Vicecomes Bulbeck, Dominus de Scales
. & Badlismer, D. Magnus Angliae Ca-
. merarius: Lectori. S. D.
----------------------------------------------
Strange that the whole (modern) KJV bible lacks a single
example of [E.VERUS] with an absolute skip value of 18 or less.
nordicskiv2 wrote:
>
> Character strings like "VERUS", "EVER", "UERUS", "UERE", "VEER", "UEER",
> etc. occur *all the time* in equidistant letter sequences in all manner
> of innocuous texts, Art; their occurrence is commonplace, and they are
> not intentional.
[E.VERUS] with an absolute skip value of 35 or less
occurs just twice in the whole (modern) KJV bible:
-------------------------------------------------
Proverbs 15:2 The tongue of the wise (e.g., neufer) u[S]eth knowledge aright: b[U]t the mouth of fools pou[R]eth out foolishness. Th[E] eyes of the LORD are in e[V]ery place, beholding th[E] evil and the good.
[E.VERUS] -20
-------------------------------------------------
Lamentations 4:19 Our persecutors (e.g., dwebb) are swifter than the eagles of the heaven: they pursued us upon the mountains, they laid wait for u[S] in the wilderness. The breath of o[U]r nostrils, the anointed of the LO[R]D, was taken in their pits, of whom w[E] said, Under his shadow we shall li[V]e among the heathen. Rejoice and b[E] glad, O daughter of Edom, that dwellest in the land of Uz; the cup also shall pass through unto thee: thou shalt be drunken, and shalt make thyself naked.
[E.VERUS] -28
-------------------------------------------------
L.Frank Baum also denied that Dorothy was
"daughter that dwellest in the land of Uz"
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
In _Hamlet_ the Hermetic side is represented by Rosencrantz
----------------------------------------------------
Many Elizabethans (e.g., Edward Dyer,
Francis Bacon, John Dee & maybe William Strange)
were Rosicrucians {Rosencrantz => Rosenkreutz}
.
In Folio's 2,3, & 4 Rosencrantz was ROSINCROSS
.
[In the first Quarto ROSINCROSS is Rossen(CRAFT)!]
-------------------------------------------------------
The Masonic side is represented by Guildenstern
------------------------------------------------------
[In first Quarto (1603) Guildenstern was GILDERSTONE]
.
. Thomas Sackville, Lord Buckhurst, (1536-1608) was
the English dramatist that paved the way for Shakespeare.
. Sackville was Grandmaster Freemason (1561-1567)
. {Freemason => Stone Guild => Guildensteen}
------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.dartmouth.edu/~milton/reading_room/on_shakespeare/index.shtml
..............................................................
<<"On Shakespear" was Milton's first published poem, appearing
anonymously in the second folio of plays by Shakespeare (1632).
There it bears the title, "An Epitaph on the admirable
Dramaticke Poet, W.SHAKESPEARE" but has no attribution.
...........................................................
On Shakespeare. 1630 by John Milton
What needs my Shakespear for his honour'd Bones,
The labour of an age in PILED STONES,
Or that his hallow'd reliques should be hid
Under a Star-ypointing Pyramid?
Dear son of memory, great heir of Fame,
What need'st thou such weak witnes of {THY NAME}?
Thou in our [W]onder and aston[I]shment
Hast bui[L]t thy self a live-[L]ong Monument.
---------------------------------------------------
____ <= 14 =>
.
. W h a t n e e d s m y S h a
. k e s p e a r f o r h i s h
. o n o u r d B o n e s T h e
. l a b o u r o f a n a g e i
. n p i l e d S t o n e s O r
. t h a t h i s h a l l o w d
. r e l i q u e s s h o u l d
. b e h i d U n d e r a S t a
. r y p o i n t i n g P y r a
. m i d D e a r s o n o f m e
. m o r y g r e a t h e i r o
. f F a m e W h a t n e e d s
. t t h o u s u c h w e a k w
.............................................
. i t n e s o f {T H Y {N} A M E}
. T h o u i n o u r [W]{O} n d e
. r a n d a s t o n [I]{S} h m e
. n t H a s t b u i [L]{T} t h y
. s e l f a l i v e [L]{O} n g M
. o n u m e n t
............................................
[WILL] 14
{OSTO} 14: "I stand in the way" (Italian)
{NOST} 14: "Knowest not." [Obs.] Chaucer.
...............................................
"Ye," seyde he,"thow {NOST} what thou menest"
from _Book Of The Duchesse_ by Geoffrey Chaucer.
----------------------------------------------
_____ *NOT (E)D WEED*
.............................................
_______ Sonnet 76 (1609)
.
____ <= 14 =>
. W h y i s m y v e r s e s o
. b a r r e n o f n e w p r i
. d e? S o f a r f r o m v a r
. i a t i o n o r q u i c <K> e
. *C H A N G E* W h y w i t h t
. h e t i m e d o <I> n o t g l
. a n c e a s i d e [T] o n e w
. f o u n (D) m e t h o d s, a n
. d t o c o m p o u n d s S T
. {R} A N G E [W] h y w r i t e I
. s t i l l a l l o n e E V E
. R {T} h e s a m e [A] n d k (E)(E)
. p e i n v (E){N}{T} i o n i n a
.............................................
. *N O T (E) D W (E) E D* T h {A}{T} E
. V E R y w o r <D>[D] O t h a l
. m o {S}{T} F E L m [Y] N a m {E} S
. h e w i n g t {H}[E]<I> r b i r
. t h a n d w h e [R] e t h {E} y
. (D) i d p r o c e [E] d O <K> n o
. w s w e {E} t l o [V] e I a l w
. a i e s w r i t [E] o f y o u
. A n d y o u a n [D] l (O) v (E) a
. r e s t <I> l l m Y a {R}<G>(U) m
. (E) n t S o a l l m y b <E> s t
. (I) s (D) r e s s i n g o <L> d w
. o r (D) s n e w S p e [N]<D> i n
. g a {G} a (I) n (E) w h a t i s a
. l r (E) a [D] y (S) p (E) n t F o r
. a s t h (E) S u n (I) s (D) a [I] l
. y n e w a n (D) o l d (S) o (I) s
. m y l o v e [S] t (I) l l t e l
. l i n g w h a t i s t o l d,
..................................................
[DEVERE] -14 {Found by James Ferris}
[DEVERE] Prob. in this Sonnet skip < 15
. [in perfect 14 x 32 array] ~ 1 in 2000
.
[DYER,E(dweed)] 14
.
[DYEREVED] 14 Prob. skip < 15 ~ 1 in 450,000
Prob. in perfect array skip < 15 ~ 1 in 1,150,000
..................................................
Edward de Vere & Edward Dyer:
.
1) Only two Shakespeare authorship candidates
. named Edward: http://tinyurl.com/6yqvqwz
.
2) Only two Shakespeare authorship candidates
. sharing yet another authorship controversy:
-----------------------------------------------------
Ancient Mystical Order Rosae Crucis
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_Mystical_Order_Rosae_Crucis
.............................................
<<The Ancient and Mystical Order Rosæ Crucis, also called the Rosicrucian Order (AMORC), is a worldwide philosophical and humanistic fraternal organization devoted to "the study of the elusive mysteries of life and the universe." The current open cycle of AMORC was activated by Harvey Spencer Lewis in 1915. Lewis received authority to do so from the Supreme Council of the Rosicrucian Order after being tried, tested and finally initiated into the Order in 1909, Toulouse, France. AMORC is said to be the modern day manifestation of the ancient Rose-Croix Order which has its origin in the Ancient Egyptian mystery schools.
AMORC's teachings draw upon ideas of the major philosophers, particularly Pythagoras, Thales, Solon, Heraclitus, Democritus. The teachings are divided into Degrees which are further grouped into broad categories under titles such as Postulant, Neophyte and Initiate sections. These degrees cover various fields related to physical, mental, psychic and spiritual existence such as physics, metaphysics, biology, psychology, parapsychology, comparative religion, traditional healing techniques, health, intuition, extrasensory perception, material and spiritual alchemy, meditation, sacred architecture, symbolism, and that mystical state of consciousness relating to the experience of unity with the Divine.
The name AMORC is an abbreviation for the Latin title Antiquus Mysticusque Ordo Rosæ Crucis ("Ancient and Mystic Order of the Rosy Cross") Harvey Spencer Lewis, an author, occultist and mystic who founded AMORC in the United States of America, wrote that "from the very start, and with the issuance of the first public manifesto, the correct name of the international Rosicrucian organization was used, namely, the Ancient and Mystical Order Rosae Crucis. This is a slightly abbreviated form of the original Latin name, Antiquus Arcanus Ordo Rosae Rubeae et Aureae Crucis, and the initials AMORC were immediately used as well as the true and original symbol of the Rosicrucian Order — the golden cross with but one red rose in the center."
Organization and structure
AMORC is a worldwide organization, established in the United States of America as a nonprofit 501(c)(3) public benefit corporation, with the specific and primary purpose of advancing the knowledge of its history, principles, and teachings for charitable, educational, and scientific purposes. It is financed mainly through fees paid by its members. Income is used by the organization to pay expenses, develop new programs, expand services, and carry out educational work.
The organizational headquarters for different jurisdictions of the AMORC are designated as "Grand Lodges." The English-speaking Grand Lodge for the Americas is headquartered in Rosicrucian Park in San Jose, California. All Grand Lodges are governed by The Supreme Grand Lodge of AMORC. The Supreme Grand Lodge meets annually, often in Lachute, Quebec, Canada (however, in August 2009 the Supreme Board met in Toulouse, France, in honor of the 100th Anniversary of H. Spencer Lewis's initiation there), and is responsible for the worldwide coordination of AMORC, the establishment of new administrations, and the appointment of jurisdictions to Grand Lodges, usually based on language. This body consists of the Imperator, Grand Masters, and related executive officers.
On a local level, members of AMORC often form smaller affiliated groups organized as Lodges, Chapters, Pronaoi, or Atrium Groups. These various titles differ according to the number of members of each body in regular attendance. Participation in these groups is optional, and participants retain compulsory membership with their respective Grand Lodge. Many of these groups charge additional dues to participants to cover expenses such as rent and mailings. Most affiliated bodies of the AMORC offer Open Meetings or Lectures to which the general public is invited and welcome.
Each AMORC Grand Lodge has its own headquarters and facilities. In North America, the largest Chapter in the world is located at 1342 Naglee Ave. ; the headquarters of the English Grand Lodge for the Americas owns the Rosicrucian Park in San Jose, California, founded in 1927, which includes the Rosicrucian Egyptian Museum, the fifth planetarium built in the USA (and the first to have a US-built star projector, built by Dr. Harvey Spencer Lewis), the Rosicrucian Peace Garden, Rosicrucian Research Library, Grand Temple, Administration Building, Fountain Plaza and Gardens.
In 1909 Harvey Spencer Lewis visited France in search of Rosicrucians, was duly initiated in Toulouse, France, and given the mandate to establish an order in North America. After further qualification and preparation the first official Manifesto was issued in the United States in 1915, announcing the establishment of Rosicrucian activity in America. May Banks-Stacy, the co-founder of AMORC, was said to be one of the last successors to the original colony of Rosicrucians that settled in America during the late 17th century, and an initiate of the Rosicrucians of the East. Lewis became a "secret partner" of Big Business in America.[7] According to railroad magnate Arthur Stillwell, no other man has exerted a greater influence as a secret partner in American free enterprise than Lewis. Walt Disney was once a member of AMORC as was Star Trek creator Gene Roddenberry and Jack Palance's daughter Holly Palance.
AMORC headquarters were located in New York City, San Francisco, and then Tampa before moving to San Jose, California, in 1927. Harvey Spencer Lewis died in 1939 and, in accordance with wishes stipulated in his will, was succeeded in the Office of Imperator by his son Ralph Maxwell Lewis who had previously served as Supreme Secretary. Gary L. Stewart who previously served as Grand Master of the English-Speaking jurisdiction and then Vice President of the Board of Directors was appointed to the Office of Imperator upon Lewis' death in 1987 in compliance with Lewis' wishes. Christian Bernard who had been the Grand Master of France and then succeeded Stewart to the position of Vice President of the Board was elected to the Office of Imperator in 1990 by the Board of Directors.
During World War II AMORC underwent a dramatic period of growth. After the war ended AMORC was able to lend support to its European sister organizations. Eventually many of these then came under the administration of AMORC's leadership in San Jose. 2009, the centennial year of H. Spencer Lewis's initiation in Toulouse, saw growth in membership in the English Grand Lodge for the Americas and very active participation in on-line activities including Facebook, Twitter, online Discussion groups, a social networking site, podcasts and Rosicrucian TV on YouTube. Rosicrucian Park in San Jose received many improvements as well, including the completion of accessibility upgrades to the museum, planetarium and grounds and the installation of sustainable native plant gardens.
AMORC uses traditional history, consisting of tales and legends represented as having been passed down for centuries by word of mouth as well as the conventional chronological history, which consists of verifiable fact. AMORC traces its origin to mystery schools established in Egypt during the joint reign of Pharaoh Thutmose III and Hatshepsut, about 1500 BCE. They united the priesthoods of Egypt into a single order under the leadership of Hatshepsut's Vizier, Hapuseneb. Each Temple had its associated Per Ankh (House of Life) where the Mysteries were handed down.[11] In uniting the priesthoods, the Per Ankhu were also united. These schools were formed to probe into "the mysteries of life" — in other words, natural phenomena, and initiatic spirituality.[12] AMORC also claims that among their most esteemed pupils were Pharaoh Akhenaten (Amenhotep IV) and his wife Nefertiti.
Over centuries these Mystery Schools spread into Greece and thence into Rome. During the Middle Ages they were concealed under various names. AMORC claims that Rosicrucianism is mentioned as far back as 1115 CE in a book of the collection of Brother Omnis Moriar in Germany. However, no other record of such a brother and book has appeared. The alleged name probably derives from the opening words of Horace in Ode 3.30 in which he writes: “Non Omnis Moriar” (“I shall not completely die”).
Rosicrucianism rose to considerable prominence in Europe during the 17th century following the publication and wide circulation of a small pamphlet, the Fama Fraternitatis. AMORC scholars have suggested that Rosicrucians first came to America in the area of present day Carmel-by-the-Sea, California in The Vizcaíno Expedition of 1602–1603. AMORC maintains that the next Rosicrucian expedition came in the chartered vessel Sarah Maria during the early months of 1694 under the leadership of Grand Master Johannes Kelpius and they established a colony in what is now Fairmount Park, Philadelphia. They finally settled on the banks of the Wissahickon. "In that retired valley beside the flowing brook the secret rites and mysteries of the true Rosicrucian Philosophy flourished unmolested for years, until the state of affairs brought about by the American Revolution, together with pernicious Sunday legislation which also discriminated against the keepers of the scriptural Sabbath day, gradually caused the incoming generation to assimilate with the secular congregations." This is disputed by another organization, the Fraternity of the Rosy Cross at one time headed by Dr. R. Swinburne Clymer. Johannes Kelpius of the Jacob Boehme Lodge in Germany led the German Pietists to America and these Rosicrucian immigrants and their descendants established a commune in 1732 at Ephrata, Pennsylvania known as the Ephrata Society under the leadership of Johann Conrad Beissel and Peter Miller (who at the behest of Congress translated the Declaration of Independence into seven languages); the buildings still exist today as part of a historical park known as Ephrata Cloisters. It is also a fact that the two rival organizations historically disputed their claims to Rosicrucian genuineness.
From 1915 to 1990 the leadership of AMORC was entrusted to the Office of an Imperator who was solely responsible for all doctrine and ritual of the Order as well as a corporate president who sat at the head of the board of directors, which was responsible for determining all corporate matters related to the organization. When AMORC reorganized in April, 1990, the dual function of the Office was merged into one position, that of President of the worldwide AMORC organization. However, internally, the President was still referred to by the traditional title of Imperator. In addition to the Imperator, each Grand Lodge has a Grand Master.
The governance of AMORC is overseen by the Supreme Grand Lodge (the Imperator, Grand Masters and Administrators), with local (geographic and/or language based) Grand Lodges throughout the world.
This is a list of people who, according to AMORC, were Rosicrucians or associated with Rosicrucian tradition and work.[citation needed]
Isaac Newton
Leonardo da Vinci
Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa
Dante Alighieri
René Descartes
Blaise Pascal
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz
Christopher Wren
Benjamin Franklin
Thomas Jefferson
Michael Faraday
Claude Debussy
Erik Satie
Édith Piaf
Napoleon Bonaparte
Francis Bacon
------------------------------------------------------
Just hotbeds of Rosicrucianism:
.
"that there is no country in the world that is so favourably
disposed towards the Brethren of the Rose Cross as Holland"
.
There was a centre of Rosicrucians in Amsterdam in 1622
------------------------------------------
http://home.planet.nl/~amorc.nl/enhistne.html
.
<<It seems that Nicolas Barnaud was in Holland in 1591 and there
united Rosicrucians around him. With Semler mention is made of a
Societas of Isaäcus Hollandus as the mother society of the German
Rosicrucians, who in 1592 gathered together. There were two affiliated
scientists, father and son, both named Isaäc. The father made a number
of discoveries and among other things constructed a rEVERbEer-oven for
metal working. Together father and son published some ten works about
chemistry, alchemy, botany, et cetera from which later Paracelsus and
Boyle have drawn. In 1601 Barnaud in Gouda addressed the Hermetic
Masters.
.
Sorbière, who lived in Holland for a long time and tried to get in
touch with the Rosicrucians everywhere, wrote among other things:
"that there is no country in the world that is so favourably disposed
towards the Brethren of the Rose Cross as Holland, where those who
know the secret of the great work enjoy so much freedom." Another
writer says, that in 1622 there were centres of Rosicrucians in
Amsterdam and in The Hague, the members of which belonged to the
distinguished classes, meeting in a palace. He also mentioned centres
in Neurenberg, Erfurt, Hamburg, Dantzig, Mantua and Venice. The
interest in the study of natural philosophy in Holland was so great,
that Irenaeus Agnostus in 1619 in Dordrecht published his Regula
Vitae, in which he highly spoke of the "hochberühmte tugendhaften
Fraternität des R.C." (the highly renowned virtuous Fraternity of the
R.C.). The famous Englishman Robert C. Fludd in 1616 at Leyden
published his Tractatus Apologeticus integritatem Societas de Rosae
Crucis. In 1615 a Dutch translation of the Fama Fraternitatis R.C.
came out, which translation was written by Abraham von Hoberweschel.
Holland was thé country of the freedom of thought. Already Coornhert
(1522-1590) - the principal leader of the Rhetoricians, the humanist,
who alternately was persecuted by Roman Catholics and Protestants -
had tried to reconcile the Cross with the Rose, as Mr. F. Wittemans
expresses it. In Holland there was a great number of ideological
groupings. The syncretists and alchemists even enjoyed the protection
of the stadtholders (viceregents). Barnaud openly introduced Maurits
as their protector. Also prince Frederik Hendrik, who was favourably
disposed towards scientists and had been introduced at Cassel in the
R.C.chapter, took the Fratres under his protection. Besides Amsterdam
and The Hague also Warmond was mentioned as the centre of R.C.
activities. Warmond by the way was known as a centre of secularism. >>
--------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.rosicrucian-order.com/principal.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.sacred-texts.com/eso/sta/sta33.htm
.
<<A great number of scholars and philosophers,
among them Sir Francis Bacon & Wolfgang von Goethe,
have been suspected of affiliation with the R(osicrucian) O(rder)>>
....................................................
THE CREST OF JOHANN VALENTIN ANDREÆ.
http://www.sacred-texts.com/eso/sta/img/14000.jpg
....................................................
<<The reference to four red roses and a white cross in the Chymical
Marriage of Christian Rosencreutz identified Johann Valentin Andreæ as
its author, for his family crest, shown above, consisted of four red
roses and a white cross.>>
-------------------------------------------------------
__ \_*_/
__ _\_/
__ * _X * Edward de Vere, Erle of Oxenford was buryed
__ _/_\ __________ the 6th daye of Julye Å 1604
__ _/ *_\
.
<<The strange, large 'X' type symbol appears to have been put there
much later. According to Paul Altrocchi, this must have happened
many decades later "...since pencils withsuch a sharp point did
not appear until the late 1600's." It really is anybody's guess
who put it there - perhaps an over-enthusiastic Oxfordian?>>
- _The Death of Edward de Vere_ by Michael Llewellyn
-----------------------------------------------
1604 WHITgift dies on February 29th.
1604 1000th anniversary of St.Augustine's death.
1604 Tomb of Christian Rosenkreutz discovered.
1604 Hamlet published
1604 FAMA Fraternitatis published
1604 Tragical History of Doctor Faustus (V1) published
1604 Oxford dies on the Feastday of John the Baptist.
1604 Kepler's NOVA/AVON.
1604 Susan marries Pembroke on the Feastday of John the Devine
---------------------------------------------------
Goethe's poem :"The Mysteries," in which Brother Mark
is guided to the Temple where the Rose Cross is on the door.
-----------------------------------------------
J.W. von Goethe: _Wilhelm Meister's Apprenticeship_
. Book II Chapter X
.
WHEN our friends began to think of going home, they looked about them
for their clergyman; but he had vanished, and was nowhere to be found.
.
'It is not polite in the man, who otherwise displayed
good breeding,' said Madam Melina, 'to desert a company
that welcomed him so kindly, without taking leave.'
'I have all the time been thinking,' said Laertes,
'where I can have seen this singular man before.
I fully intended to ask him about it at parting.'
'I too had the same feeling,' said Wilhelm, 'and certainly
I should not have let him go, till he had told us something
more about his circumstances. I am much mistaken
if I have not ere now spoken with him somewhere.'
'And you may in truth,' said Philina, 'be mistaken there.
This person seems to have the air of an acquaintance,
because he looks like a man, and not like *JACK or KIT* '
'What is this?' said Laertes. 'Do not we two look like men?'
'I know what I am saying,? cried Philina;
'and if you cannot understand me, nEVER mind. In the end
my words will be found to require no commentary.'
---------------------------------------------
. Beaumont and Fletcher. Philaster.
. Act the Fifth Scene IV
.
1ST CIT.: I'll have a leg, that's certain.
2ND CIT.: I'll have an arm.
3RD CIT.: I'll have his nose, and at mine own charge
. build a college and clap't upon the gate.
4TH CIT.: I'll have his little gut to string a *KIT* with;
. For certainly a royal gut will sound like silVER.
---------------------------------------------
. sudore non supore - by labour not sleep
.......................................
. http://www.st-ives.info/
.
As I was going to St Ives I met a man with seven wives.
Each wife had seven sacks, Each sack had seven cats,
Each cat had seven KITs;
KITs, cats, sacks and wives -
How many were going to St Ives?
--------------------------------------------
____*OXENFORD*
.
____*R.O. : FOX DEN*
____*R(osicrucian) O(rder) : FOX DEN*
.
____*KITS*
----------------------------------------------
Peter Bull's 14 letter *TIK-KITM-MARL-LOW*
is somewhat less impressive but quite similar
to John Rollett's 15 letter discovery of
*HENRY-WR-IOTH-ESLEY* in the Sonnets
dedication (: i.e., a name closely associated with
William Shakespeare which is broken into 4 pieces).
.
Rollett's solution is clearly statistically significant
in its own right. Peter Bull's *TIK-KITM-MARL-LOW*
is probably statistically significant as well given
the apriori existence & legitimacy of Rollett's find.
---------------------------------------------------
[T]hou wilt restore, to be my comfort still:
[I]s't not enough to torture me alone,
[K]nowing thy heart torments me with disdain,
[I]f Nature, sovereign mistress over WRACK, [short sonnet!]
[T]o weigh how once I suffered in your crime.
[M]ine eye well knows what with his gust is 'greeing,
[A]nd peace proclaims olives of endless age.
[R]eturn, forgetful Muse, and straight redeem
[L]ike a deceived husband; so love's face
[O]f faults conceal'd, wherein I am attainted,
[W]hen others would give life and bring a TOMB.
--------------------------------------------------
(W)hy of eyes' falsehood hast thou forged hooks,
(I)n things of great receipt with ease we prove
(S)hall Will in others seem right gracious,
(H)e learn'd but surety-like to write for me
.
Sonnet 135: WhoEVER hath her *WISH* , thou hast thy 'Will,'
.
. King Lear Act 2, Scene 4
.
REGAN: so will you *WISH ON* me,
.
. Measure for Measure Act 2, Scene 1
.
FROTH: I nEVER come into any room in a *TAP-house*
. but I am drawn in.
-------------------------------------------------
Philip Massinger: _A New Way to Pay Old Debts_
. Act I Scene I
.
[Enter] TAPWELL, WELLBORN [in tattered apparel,] and FROTH
.
TAP. [to his wife.] Cry out for help!
.
WELL. Stir, and thou diest:
Your potent prince, the constable, shall not save you.
Hear me ungrateful hell-hound! Did not I
Make purses for you? Then you lick?d my boots,
And thought your holiday cloak too coarse to clean them.
?Twas I that, when I heard thee swear if ever
Thou couldst arrive at forty pounds thou wouldst
Live like an emperor, ?twas I that gave it
In ready gold. Deny this, wretch!
.
TAP. I must, sir;
For, from the tavern to the *TAPhouse* , all,
On forfeiture of their licenses, stand bound
Ne?er to remember who their best guests were,
If they grew poor like you.
.
WELL. They are well rewarded
That beggar themselves to make such cuckolds rich.
--------------------------------------------
http://shakespeareauthorship.com/cipher/bmarlowe1.html
.
. <= 12 =>
.
137 T T T Y I B(W)W W W O T
136 I S A T W I(I)A T T F T
135 W A M T W N(S)A T A S O
134 S A M[T]B F(H)V T T A S
133 B F[I]B M A[O]A P B W T
132 T[K]H L A B[N]D A O T A
131 T A F T Y T(T)A A A O T
130 M C[I I}I B(A)T I T I M
129 T I{I}S I P(P)O M H A B
128 H V W[T]D{T)W A T A O M
127 I O B A F F S B T H A S
126 O D W{T|I]A S M Y S H A
125 W W O W H L F P N A W B
124 Y I A W N I V W I W B T
123 N T T T O W A T T N F M
122 T F W B O H T O T N T T
121 T W A N F G O W N A I B
120 T A N V F A A[T]O M A T
119 W D A S W W H I O T A G
118 L W A W E T A T T T A W
117 A W F W T A T W B A B B
116 L A W O O T I W L W L B
115 T E Y M B C T D A M W C
114 O D O A T S C A O A[M]A
113 S A D S F O O N F T T T
112 Y W F S Y T N T I O T M
111 O T T T T A T P W P N N
110 A A G M M A T A N M O A
109 O T A A T L I S N A T T
108 W W W T N I C E S W N B
107 N O C S T A I[A]N M S W
106 W I A I T O I E S O A T
105 L N S T K S T O F F A T
104 T F S H T I T S A S S H
103 A T T T O L T D W T F T
102 M I T T O W A A N T B A
101 O F B S M T B B B E T A
100 W T S D[R]I S A R I I A
.99 T S I W I T A T O A A B
.98 F W H T Y O C O N N T D
.97 H F W W A T B L Y B F A
.96 S S B T A T S T H I H I
.95 H W D O T M C N O W W A
.94 T T W V T A T O T T B T
.93 S[L]M T F T I I B T W T
.92 B F A F T W I T T S O H
.91 S S S S A W B A T R O A
.90 T N I A A C G T I W B A
.89 S A S A T T A I B T L A
.88 W A V A W V[O]T A F T D
.87 F A T M F A T A T O S C
.86 W B T M W A N G H W A I
.85 M W R A I A T I H A B T
.84 W T I W L T B T L N A M
.83 I A I T A T H S T W F[W]
----------------------------------
Recalculated for first 12 lines:
-------------------------------------------
*KITM-MARL-LOW* probability ~ 1/760
----------------------------------------------------
Consider the "Bull Sonnets Acrostic Array" at Terry's site:
http://shakespeareauthorship.com/cipher/bmarlowe1.html
.
Use a 'String Find' to count (in first 12 columns):
.
. 4 K's
. 68 M's
. 41 L's
.
. This automatically gives:
.
. 4 x 68 "K-M" pairs and
. 68 x 41 "M-L" pairs
.
However, each "K**M" or "M**L" 4 LETTER string
must be separated by multiples of 3 rows & 3 columns
.
Hence, the [E]xpected [V]alue number of interesting
. "K**M" or "M**L" 4 LETTER strings
. in the Bull array
.
. "K**M" E.V.: ~ 4*68/(3*3) ~ 30
. "M**L" E.V.: ~ 67*41/(3*3) ~ 305
-------------------------------------------------
Now use 'String Find' {e.g., on "I T" & "T I"}
.to count (for whole 14 lines):
.
50 "IT"s (left right pairs out of ~ 4000)
.8 "AR"s (left right pairs out of ~ 4000)
31 "OW"s (left right pairs out of ~ 4000)
.
. "IT" probability: 50/4000
. "AR" probability: 8/4000
. "OW" probability: 31/4000
--------------------------------------------
. Now applying the
.
"IT" prob: 50/4000 = 1/80
"AR" prob: 8/4000 = 1/500
.
. to the [E]xpected [V]alue of interesting
. "K**M" or "M**L" 4 LETTER strings
.
gives [E]xpected [V]alue of
.
. "KITM" E.V. = 30 / 80
. "MARL" E.V.= 305 / 500
.
Hence one would be lucky to expect ONE of each
(which presumeably is what Peter Bull found)
----------------------------------------------
However, one would NOT expect these
. two (expected) 4 LETTER strings:
"KITM" & "MARL" to share the SAME "M"!
.
. For these two strings to share the SAME "M"
.
"KITM-MARL" E.V.: 30*305/(80*500*68) ~ 1/297
------------------------------------------------------
The additional of "LOW" adds a little bit more to this:
--------------------------------------------------
Given the prior spacings in "KITM" & "MARL"
it would be reasonable to look for the "O"
. of the "OW" pair in one of 62 positions:
.
. [L]M T F T I I
. F A F T W I T
. S S S A W B A
. N I A A C G T
. A S A T T A I
. A V A W V[O]T
. A T M F A T A
. B T M W A N G
. W R A I A T I
.
Only one "[O]W" is found out of 62.
.
. How does this compare with and
. expected "OW" prob: ~31/4000?
-----------------------------------------
. Fisher's Exact Test
http://www.matforsk.no/ola/fisher.htm
.
. TABLE = [ 1 , 61 , 31 , 3970 ]
2-Tail : p-value = 0.38980385512773885
-----------------------------------------
. So the [E]xpected [V]alue of
. the final "OW" is ~0.39
.
"KITM-MARL-LOW" probability: 0.39/297 ~ 1/760
.
A respectable if not overly impressive number in itself.
------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Bull points out:
.
<<1 The beginning of the message is very clearly signposted. The
K forming the first letter of the message is the starting point of no
less than five regularly formed KITs, one of which appears in adjacent
squares and all of which are straight-line examples, with left to
right orientation and tight letter spacing. This KIT node is 'highly
anomalous' in the grid. It is eye-catching. Its occurence is highly
unlikely to be the product of random forces.
.
2. The line of the message as it unfolds from the initial K is
also indicated because the KITM of the first section is exactly
superimposed on a seperate KIT line. This is a signal of its
intentionality. It is an anomaly compounded.>>
-----------------------------------------------------
So what about the four other "regularly formed KITs"
.
. The pertinent I's lie within the 25 spaces
. of a half-diamond surrounding the K in "KITM":
.
. S
. A M
. A M[T]
. F[I]B M
. [K]H L A B
. A F T Y
. C[I I}
. I{I}
. V [T] {T}
.
. {T}
.
. So 4 of these 25 spaces produce
. the "I" for a "KIT" while 19 do not
. [; ignoring the "K" & "T"]
.
Compare this with the 50 "IT"s found in ~ 4000
. left right pairs in the "Bull array":
---------------------------------------------
. Fisher's Exact Test
http://www.matforsk.no/ola/fisher.htm
.
. TABLE = [ 4 , 19 , 50 , 3950 ]
2-Tail : p-value = 0.00021257190299677967
-----------------------------------------------
Therefore there is only ~ 1/4700!! probability
. for this close clustering of 4 "KIT"s!
----------------------------------------------
Hence, the chance of "KITM-MARL-LOW"
. PLUS 4 close "KIT"s
.
. ~ 1/(760 x 4700) ~1/3,600,000!!!
----------------------------------------------------
http://www.masoncode.com/Great%20Seal%20Sonnets.htm
As an Oxfordian the base 17 pyramid is ideal!
-----------------------------------------------
A nice pattern emerges if
the sonnets are written out in
boustrophedon "ox path" style:
..................................................
*Under a STAR-Y-pointing PYRAMID* -- Milton (1630)
.
---------- *SONET EYES*
...
---------------- * 154
--------------- 0 0 153
-------------- 0 * * 151
------------- 0 * * * 148
------------ 0 0 Y * * 144
----------- 0 * 0 * * * 139
---------- 0 * * 0 * 0 0 133
-------------------------------------------
--------- * * * * 0 * 0 * 125
-------- * * * * 0 0 * * * 117
------- * * 0 * 0 * * * * * 108
------ 0 * * * * 0 * 0 * * * 98
----- * * * * 0 * 0 * * 0 * * 87
---- * * * * * * 0 * * * * * * 75
--- 0 0 * * * * 0 0 * * * * * 0 62
-- * * * * * * * * * 0 * * 0 0 * 48
- 0 * 0 0 0 * * * 0 0 0 * * 0 * 0 33
. 0 0 * * 0 * 0 * 0 * * * * 0 * 0 0 17
----------------------------------------------------
What needs my Shakespeare for his honour'd bones,
The labour of an age in piled *STONES* ,
.....................................
_____*STONES*
_____{anagram}
_____*SONETS*
.....................................
Or that his hallow'd relics should be hid
*Under a STAR-Y-pointing PYRAMID* ?
Dear son of memory, great heir of fame,
What need'st thou such weak witness of thy name?
------------------------------------------
Art Neuendorffer
0 new messages