Shakespeare Was Not Bacon, Greville, Oxford or Marlowe, And Peele Had Nothing To Do With The Writing Of Titus Andronicus

Anonymous

unread,

Jan 24, 2013, 10:55:51 AM1/24/13

to

$cxp1 And check out the current thread:
Dedication of the Funeral Elegy: Not By Ford. Despite the many
candidates proposed as the "true" author
of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup,
William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate
supported by the historical evidence.

http://tinyurl.com/cojgwl

see also

http://ShakespeareAuthorship.com

The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all!
http://shakesandbacon.yolasite.com

Anonymous

unread,

Jan 27, 2013, 12:08:45 AM1/27/13

to

$2 Check out the current thread: "Dedication of the Funeral Elegy:

Jim KQKnave

unread,

Jan 28, 2013, 12:31:27 PM1/28/13

to

3gkro Check out the current thread: "Dedication of the Funeral Elegy: Not By

Anonymous

unread,

Jan 28, 2013, 7:56:23 PM1/28/13

to

$ax5 Check out the current thread: "Dedication of the Funeral

Dave U. Random

unread,

Jan 28, 2013, 9:13:49 PM1/28/13

to

3$ Check out the current thread: "Dedication of the Funeral Elegy:

Anonymous

unread,

Feb 8, 2013, 9:41:43 AM2/8/13

to

m~Check out the current thread: "Dedication of the Funeral Elegy:

Jim KQKnave

unread,

Feb 12, 2013, 5:09:29 PM2/12/13

to

$tCheck out the current thread: "Dedication of the Funeral Elegy: Not By Ford."

Anonymous

unread,

Feb 19, 2013, 3:14:29 PM2/19/13

to

8#Check out the current thread: "Dedication of the Funeral Elegy:

Anonymous

unread,

Feb 21, 2013, 2:33:41 PM2/21/13

to

$9Check out the current thread: "Dedication of the Funeral Elegy:

Anonymous

unread,

Feb 25, 2013, 4:51:50 PM2/25/13

to

0%Check out the current thread: "Dedication of the Funeral Elegy:

Anonymous

unread,

Feb 28, 2013, 3:34:54 PM2/28/13

to

^1Check out the current thread: "Dedication of the Funeral Elegy:

Anonymous

unread,

Feb 28, 2013, 5:27:39 PM2/28/13

to

2&Check out the current thread: "Dedication of the Funeral Elegy:

Jim KQKnave

unread,

Apr 3, 2013, 1:56:57 PM4/3/13

to

5!Check out the current thread: "Dedication of the Funeral Elegy: Not By Ford."

Anonymous

unread,

Apr 4, 2013, 1:15:37 PM4/4/13

to

5$Check out the current thread: "Dedication of the Funeral Elegy:

Anonymous

unread,

Apr 6, 2013, 4:20:19 PM4/6/13

to

%6Check out the current thread: "Dedication of the Funeral Elegy:

Dave U. Random

unread,

Apr 8, 2013, 2:57:01 PM4/8/13

to

Dave U. Random

unread,

Apr 10, 2013, 9:50:03 PM4/10/13

to

%9Check out the current thread: "Dedication of the Funeral Elegy:

Anonymous

unread,

Apr 11, 2013, 4:46:23 PM4/11/13

to

0^Check out the current thread: "Dedication of the Funeral Elegy:

Anonymous

unread,

Apr 14, 2013, 9:12:29 AM4/14/13

to

+1Check out the current thread: "Dedication of the Funeral Elegy:

Jim KQKnave

unread,

Apr 17, 2013, 11:43:26 AM4/17/13

to

2`Check out the current thread: "Dedication of the Funeral Elegy: Not By Ford."

Anonymous

unread,

Apr 17, 2013, 3:18:31 AM4/17/13

to

2~Check out the current thread: "Dedication of the Funeral Elegy:

Jim KQKnave

unread,

Apr 22, 2013, 12:07:36 PM4/22/13

to

[3Check out the current thread: "Dedication of the Funeral Elegy: Not By Ford."

Anonymous

unread,

Apr 22, 2013, 10:21:14 PM4/22/13

to

4]Check out the current thread: "Dedication of the Funeral Elegy:

Jim KQKnave

unread,

Apr 24, 2013, 12:25:12 PM4/24/13

to

\5Check out the current thread: "Dedication of the Funeral Elegy: Not By Ford."

Dave U. Random

unread,

Apr 25, 2013, 12:02:11 AM4/25/13

to

;5Check out the current thread: "Dedication of the Funeral Elegy:

Anonymous

unread,

Apr 25, 2013, 6:05:29 PM4/25/13

to

5"Check out the current thread: "Dedication of the Funeral Elegy:

Jim KQKnave

unread,

Apr 28, 2013, 4:53:41 PM4/28/13

to

,6Check out the current thread: "Dedication of the Funeral Elegy: Not By Ford."

Jim KQKnave

unread,

May 1, 2013, 6:01:05 PM5/1/13

to

:.Check out the current thread: "Dedication of the Funeral Elegy: Not By Ford."

Dave U. Random

unread,

May 2, 2013, 1:52:28 PM5/2/13

to

%,Search this group: "bloopers part" for Mistakes in "Shakespeare,
Co-Author"

Dave U. Random

unread,

May 5, 2013, 2:08:21 AM5/5/13

to

&[Search this group: "bloopers part" for Mistakes in "Shakespeare,
Co-Author"

Anonymous

unread,

May 7, 2013, 12:17:51 AM5/7/13

to

=?Search this group: "bloopers part" for Mistakes in "Shakespeare,
Co-Author"

Jim KQKnave

unread,

May 18, 2013, 12:24:18 PM5/18/13

to

%,Search this group: "bloopers part" for Mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-Author"

Agent Jim
Fighting Pseudoscholarship One Day At A Time

Jim KQKnave

unread,

May 25, 2013, 3:09:51 PM5/25/13

to

&.Check out the current thread: "Dedication of the Funeral Elegy::Not By Ford."

Anonymous

unread,

May 25, 2013, 5:57:02 PM5/25/13

to

}#Search this group: "bloopers part" for Mistakes in "Shakespeare,
Co-Author"

Rotalius LaSpinks

unread,

May 26, 2013, 1:08:34 AM5/26/13

to

[$Search this group:"bloopers part" for: mistakes in "Shakespeare,
Co-Author"

Rotalius LaSpinks

unread,

May 26, 2013, 6:59:18 PM5/26/13

to

I forgot to mention: I was picked in the seventh round, and even I
know Shakespeare wrote Shakespeare.
*.Search this group:"bloopers part" for: mistakes in "Shakespeare,

Dave U. Random

unread,

May 29, 2013, 8:33:34 AM5/29/13

to

*}Search this group-"bloopers part" for> mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-Author"

Dave U. Random

unread,

May 31, 2013, 6:39:09 PM5/31/13

to

}{Search this group,"bloopers part" for:mistakes in "Shakespeare,

Zondo Smythe-Blackwood

unread,

Jun 3, 2013, 10:06:07 AM6/3/13

to

[]Search this group,"bloopers part" for-mistakes in "Shakespeare,
Co-Author"

Dave U. Random

unread,

Jun 4, 2013, 11:53:44 AM6/4/13

to

**Search this group:"bloopers part" for errors in "Shakespeare,Co-

Anonymous

unread,

Jun 6, 2013, 4:05:02 PM6/6/13

to

!!Search this group-"bloopers part" for: errors in "Shakespeare,Co-

Dave U. Random

unread,

Jun 7, 2013, 7:21:23 PM6/7/13

to

`+Search this group-"bloopers part" for+ mistakes in"Shakespeare,
Co-Author"

Anonymous

unread,

Jun 13, 2013, 12:41:25 PM6/13/13

to

`Search this group: "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare,

Dave U. Random

unread,

Jun 16, 2013, 6:35:13 PM6/16/13

to

=Search this group: "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare,

Co-Author"=

Anonymous

unread,

Jun 17, 2013, 7:49:49 AM6/17/13

to

=Search this group: "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare,
Co-Author"=

Dave U. Random

unread,

Jun 18, 2013, 5:20:23 PM6/18/13

to

@Search this group: "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare,

Co-Author"+

Jim KQKnave

unread,

Jul 7, 2013, 2:47:16 PM7/7/13

to

`Search HLAS for: "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-Author"`

Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author
of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup,
William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate
supported by the historical evidence.

http://tinyurl.com/cojgwl

see also

http://ShakespeareAuthorship.com

The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all!
http://shakesandbacon.yolasite.com

Dave U. Random

unread,

Jul 17, 2013, 8:55:56 AM7/17/13

to

!Search this group: "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare,

Co-Author")

Anonymous

unread,

Jul 20, 2013, 7:02:03 PM7/20/13

to

&Search this group: "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare,

Co-Author"]

Anonymous

unread,

Jul 22, 2013, 12:11:36 AM7/22/13

to

%Search this group: "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare,

Co-Author"[

Anonymous

unread,

Jul 30, 2013, 8:29:14 AM7/30/13

to

&Search this group: "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare,

Co-Author"+

Dave U. Random

unread,

Aug 9, 2013, 3:40:10 AM8/9/13

to

+Search this group> "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-Author"&

Dave U. Random

unread,

Aug 10, 2013, 4:21:18 PM8/10/13

to

&&Search this group> "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-Author"^

Anonymous

unread,

Aug 22, 2013, 11:30:38 AM8/22/13

to

((Search this group> "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-Author"~

Anonymous

unread,

Aug 26, 2013, 1:27:39 PM8/26/13

to

##Search this group> "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-Author"$

Anonymous

unread,

Sep 9, 2013, 9:19:24 PM9/9/13

to

$$Search this group> "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-Author"=

Jim KQKnave

unread,

Sep 26, 2013, 5:05:17 PM9/26/13

to

In fact, there is so much evidence concerning Shakespeare's
authorship
of Titus 1.1 that it is a major problem trying to condense it all
into
a paper of reasonable length.

Search this group "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-
Author"

Anonymous

unread,

Oct 11, 2013, 5:42:05 AM10/11/13

to

In fact, there is so much evidence concerning Shakespeare's
authorship
of Titus 1.1 that it is a major problem trying to condense it all
into
a paper of reasonable length.

Search this group "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-
Author"

Dave U. Random

unread,

Oct 20, 2013, 4:47:03 PM10/20/13

to

^'In fact, there is so much evidence concerning -Shakespeare's
authorship
of Titus 1.1 that it is a major problem, trying to condense it all

into
a paper of reasonable length.

Search this group "bloopers part" for mistakes in "Shakespeare, Co-
Author"

Tomdic Anharry

unread,

Nov 2, 2013, 12:29:46 PM11/2/13

to

%,In fact, there is so much evidence concerning: Shake-

speare's authorship of: Titus 1.1 that it is a major problem

trying to condense it all into a paper of reasonable length.

Search this group: "bloopers part", for mistakes in
"Shakespeare, Co-Author".

Dave U. Random

unread,

Nov 8, 2013, 10:49:24 AM11/8/13

to

*^In fact, there is so much evidence concerning: Shake'
speare's authorship of& Titus 1.1 that it is a major problem

trying to condense it all into a paper of reasonable length.

Search this group: "bloopers part", for mistakes in
"Shakespeare, Co-Author".

Nomen Nescio

unread,

Nov 9, 2013, 9:01:07 PM11/9/13

to

I think everybody knows that even if they won't admit it.

But what I wanted to point out is that the mathematics
teacher from Dartmouth who has been stalking
Art Neuendorffer seems to be giving up.

He seems hardly to make an effort any more.

Tomdic Anharry

unread,

Nov 14, 2013, 8:30:16 PM11/14/13

to

&^In fact, there is so much evidence concerning; Shake-
speare's authorship of8 Titus 1.1 that it is a major !problem

trying to condense it all into a paper of reasonable length.

Search this group: "bloopers part", for mistakes in
"Shakespeare, Co-Author".

Dave U. Random

unread,

Nov 22, 2013, 11:58:25 AM11/22/13

to

;:In fact, there is so much evidence concerning$ Shake~

speare's authorship of8 Titus 1.1 that it is a major !problem
trying to condense it all into a paper of reasonable length.

Search this group: "bloopers part", for mistakes in
"Shakespeare, Co-Author".

Anonymous

unread,

Nov 29, 2013, 9:59:52 PM11/29/13

to

''In fact, there is so much evidence concerning- Shake=
speare's authorship of7 Titus 1.1 that it is a major ~problem
trying 6to condense it all into a paper of reasonable length.

Shomongo Butterick

unread,

Dec 6, 2013, 7:25:36 AM12/6/13

to

++In fact, there is so much !evidence concerning Shake,
speare's authorship 8of Titus 1.1 that it is a major -problem
trying to 5condense it all into a paper of reasonable length.

Shomongo Butterick

unread,

Dec 18, 2013, 3:49:50 AM12/18/13

to

==In fact, there is so much ^evidence concerning Shake,
speare's authorship 9of Titus 1.1 that it is a major +problem

Dave U. Random

unread,

Dec 21, 2013, 6:42:32 PM12/21/13

to

==In fact, there is so much -evidence concerning Shake]
speare's authorship 1of Titus 1.1 that it is a major :problem
trying to ^condense it all into a paper of reasonable length.

Dave U. Random

unread,

Jan 4, 2014, 6:22:04 AM1/4/14

to

%%In fact, there is so much ;evidence concerning Shake+
speare's authorship 4of Titus 1.1 that it is a major }problem
trying to ?condense it all into a paper of reasonable length.

Dave U. Random

unread,

Jan 27, 2014, 11:13:50 AM1/27/14

to

[[In fact, there is so much ^evidence concerning Shake=
speare's authorship of !Titus 1.1 that it is a major .problem
trying to ,condense it all into a paper of reasonable length.

!Search this ~group: "bloopers part", for mistakes& in

Dave U. Random

unread,

Jan 29, 2014, 1:45:13 PM1/29/14

to

+In fact, there is so much {evidence concerning Shake'
speare's authorship of 1Titus 1.1 that it is a major .problem
trying to ,condense it all into a paper of reasonable length.

;Search this ~group: "bloopers part", for mistakes: in

Anonymous

unread,

Feb 28, 2014, 3:04:42 AM2/28/14

to

;In fact, there is so much }evidence concerning Shake
speare's authorship of Ti-tus 1.1 that it is a major $problem
trying to ,condense it all into a paper of reasonable length.

4Search this !group for "bloopers part" for mistakes~ in

Anonymous

unread,

Mar 27, 2014, 10:52:54 AM3/27/14

to

$In fact, there is so much evidence concerning Shake

speare's authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a major problem
^trying to condense it all into a paper of reasonable length.

#Search this !group for "bloopers part" for mistakes in

Anonymous

unread,

Mar 28, 2014, 12:14:56 PM3/28/14

to

$$$In fact, there is so much evidence concerning Shake

speare's authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a major problem
^trying to condense it all into a paper of reasonable length.

%$#Search this group for "bloopers part" for mistakes in

Dave U. Random

unread,

Apr 15, 2014, 1:28:45 PM4/15/14

to

# http://www.periodictable.com/Items/047.25/index.html &*

&* In fact, there is so much: evidence concerning Shakespeare's ((
~authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a major problem trying to -
!condense it all into a paper of reasonable length. +

@Search HLAS for: "bloopers part" for mistakes `
#in "Shakespeare, Co-Author" ~

$Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author &
%of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup,^
^William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate %
&supported by the historical evidence. $

Anonymous

unread,

Apr 15, 2014, 2:00:48 PM4/15/14

to

$$$In fact, there is so much evidence concerning Shake

speare's authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a major problem
^trying to condense it all into a paper of reasonable length.

%$#Search this group for "bloopers part" for mistakes in

Anonymous

unread,

Apr 24, 2014, 6:01:40 AM4/24/14

to

( http://www.periodictable.com/Items/047.25/index.html )-

- In fact, there is so much: evidence concerning Shakespeare's 01
+ authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a major problem trying to -
@ condense it all into a paper of reasonable length. +

^ Search HLAS for: "bloopers part" for mistakes :
& in "Shakespeare, Co-Author" .

?Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author !
.of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup,$
%William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate *
`supported by the historical evidence. $

** http://tinyurl.com/cojgwl ^^

see also

++ http://ShakespeareAuthorship.com !!

Anonymous

unread,

Apr 30, 2014, 5:56:18 AM4/30/14

to

( http://www.periodictable.com/Items/047.25/index.html )+

+ In fact, there is so much: evidence concerning Shakespeare's 01
authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a major problem trying to +
~ condense it all into a paper of reasonable length. .

^ Search HLAS for: "bloopers part" for mistakes :

& in "Shakespeare, Co+Author" .

?Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author !
of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup,$
(William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate ?
`supported by the historical evidence. $

?? http://tinyurl.com/cojgwl ^^

see also

. http://ShakespeareAuthorship.com !!

''The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all!
;;http://shakesandbacon.yolasite.com

John Kennerson

unread,

May 10, 2014, 4:18:11 PM5/10/14

to

? http://www.periodictable.com/Items/047.25/index.html )-

- In fact, there is so much: evidence concerning Shakespeare's 01
, authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a major problem trying to -
@ condense it all into a paper of reasonable length. ,

^ Search HLAS for: "bloopers part" for mistakes :
& in "Shakespeare, Co-Author" .

?Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author !
.of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup,$
%William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate $
`supported by the historical evidence. $

$$ http://tinyurl.com/cojgwl ^^

% see also

,, http://ShakespeareAuthorship.com !!

* The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all!
* http://shakesandbacon.yolasite.com

Phil Innes

unread,

May 11, 2014, 2:58:21 PM5/11/14

to

I think I pointed out to them both something which deflates the authorship argument in both their excitements, that The Author is obviously a pre-incarnation of ELVYS [A. Sax., meaning mischievous, and still, I might point out, in use.] as is strongly suggested in the term BEEBOPALOOLA [A. Sax, 'to stain' see Euphue's Golden Legacie and also Collier's Shak Lib p. 5 rendered as BEBAST, and similar to BEBLOTTE] a numerological significant expression to Baconians. As to stalking and exteriorized conflict to what is not resolved in oneself, we all do it, but true, doing it so much can become a pathological condition.

BE[E]
BO[P]
AL[O]
OL[A]

There's not aope of them but in his house /Macbeth iii4 f2

Which accords with the famous typo cipher in Folio 2 written just West of Oxford in a pintle.

Cordially,

marco

unread,

May 12, 2014, 1:45:45 PM5/12/14

to

Anonymous

unread,

May 15, 2014, 5:13:59 PM5/15/14

to

? http://www.periodictable.com/Items/047.25/index.html ),

, In fact, there is so much: evidence concerning Shakespeare's 01
, authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a major problem trying to ,
+ condense it all into a paper of reasonable length. ,

^ Search HLAS for: "bloopers part" for mistakes :
& in "Shakespeare, Co,Author" .

/Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author !
.of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup,[

|William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate [
`supported by the historical evidence. [

[[ http://tinyurl.com/cojgwl ^^

| see also

,, http://ShakespeareAuthorship.com !!

] The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all!
] http://shakesandbacon.yolasite.com

Dave U. Random

unread,

May 29, 2014, 10:46:48 AM5/29/14

to

? In fact, there is so much evidence concerning Shakespeare's *
@ authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a major problem trying to -
` condense it all into a paper of reasonable length. ,

& Search HLAS for: "bloopers part" for mistakes :
^ in "Shakespeare, Co-Author" .

.Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author !
?of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup,[
`William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate [
@supported by the historical evidence. [

%% http:\\tinyurl.com/cojgwl ^^

& see also

,, http:\\ShakespeareAuthorship.com !!

~ The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all!
~ http:\\shakesandbacon.yolasite.com

John Kennerson

unread,

Jun 10, 2014, 1:08:16 PM6/10/14

to

* In fact, there is so much evidence concerning Shakespeare's {
+ authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a major problem trying to {
` condense it all into a paper of reasonable length. {

% Search HLAS for: "bloopers part" for mistakes }

^ in "Shakespeare, Co-Author" .

.Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author }
?of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup,}

`William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate }

+supported by the historical evidence. }

$$ http:\\tinyurl.com/cojgwl **

% see also

,, http:\\ShakespeareAuthorship.com ..
[ The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all.
[ http:\\shakesandbacon.yolasite.com .

Anonymous

unread,

Jun 17, 2014, 12:48:27 PM6/17/14

to

+ In fact, there is so much evidence concerning Shakespeare's )
* authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a major problem trying to )
& condense it all into a paper of reasonable length. )

- Search HLAS for: "bloopers part" for mistakes )
% in "Shakespeare, Co-Author" .

^Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author |
_of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup,|
?William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate )

+supported by the historical evidence. }

== http:\\tinyurl.com/cojgwl **

@ see also

{{ http:\\ShakespeareAuthorship.com }}
{ The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all}
{ http:\\shakesandbacon.yolasite.com }

John Kennerson

unread,

Jun 22, 2014, 1:45:44 PM6/22/14

to

^ In fact, there is so much evidence concerning Shakespeare's |
* authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a major problem trying to |
% condense it all into a paper of reasonable length. |

- Search HLAS for: "bloopers part" for mistakes |
+ in "Shakespeare, Co-Author" .

^Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author "
_of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup,"
?William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate |
+supported by the historical evidence. #

$$ http:\\tinyurl.com/cojgwl **

@ see also

** http:\\ShakespeareAuthorship.com ##
* The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all#
* http:\\shakesandbacon.yolasite.com #

Anonymous

unread,

Jul 3, 2014, 8:12:09 PM7/3/14

to

= In fact, there is so much evidence concerning Shakespeare's ]
{ authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a major problem trying to ]
% condense it all into a paper of reasonable length. ]

_ Search HLAS for: "bloopers part" for mistakes ]
" in "Shakespeare, Co-Author" .

-Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author "
_of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup,"
?William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate ]
"supported by the historical evidence. v

$$ http:\\tinyurl.com/cojgwl {{

@ see also

{{ http:\\ShakespeareAuthorship.com vv
{ The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all v
{ http:\\shakesandbacon.yolasite.com v

Dave U. Random

unread,

Jul 8, 2014, 4:58:00 PM7/8/14

to

- In fact, there is so much evidence concerning Shakespeare's =
] authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a major problem trying to [
# condense it all into a paper of reasonable length. ;

+ Search HLAS for: "bloopers part" for mistakes ;
% in "Shakespeare, Co-Author" ;

=Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author |

}of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup,|
'William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate |

!supported by the historical evidence. |

>> http:\\tinyurl.com/cojgwl __

> see also

&& http:\\ShakespeareAuthorship.com |
^ The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all ^
^ http:\\shakesandbacon.yolasite.com >

Shavolian Tonguewhistler

unread,

Jul 13, 2014, 6:34:25 AM7/13/14

to

_ In fact, there is so much evidence concerning Shakespeare's =
[ authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a major problem trying to }
# condense it all into a paper of reasonable length. @

= Search HLAS for: "bloopers part" for mistakes @
% in "Shakespeare, Co-Author" @

=Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author ~
}of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup,~
>William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate ~
*supported by the historical evidence. ~

<< http:\\tinyurl.com/cojgwl $$

< see also

&& http:\\ShakespeareAuthorship.com ~
# The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all #
# http:\\shakesandbacon.yolasite.com <

John Kennerson

unread,

Jul 17, 2014, 1:36:48 PM7/17/14

to

= In fact, there is so much evidence concerning Shakespeare's }

# authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a major problem trying to ^
+ condense it all into a paper of reasonable length. ~

% Search HLAS for: "bloopers part" for mistakes =
= in "Shakespeare, Co-Author" $

}Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author *
=of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup,&
*William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate ^
>supported by the historical evidence. %

< http:\\tinyurl.com/cojgwl ~~

<< see also

## http:\\ShakespeareAuthorship.com #
- The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all #
@ http:\\shakesandbacon.yolasite.com <

Anonymous

unread,

Jul 22, 2014, 6:56:56 AM7/22/14

to

= In fact, there is so much evidence concerning Shakespeare's }

Heinrich Shambleton

unread,

Aug 3, 2014, 12:48:08 PM8/3/14

to

& In fact, there is so much evidence concerning Shakespeare's {
= authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a major problem trying to =

+ condense it all into a paper of reasonable length. <

% Search HLAS for: "bloopers part" for mistakes &
& in "Shakespeare, Co-Author" $

{Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author *
&of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup,+
*William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate ^
-supported by the historical evidence. %

> http:\\tinyurl.com/cojgwl <<

>> see also

== http:\\ShakespeareAuthorship.com =
[ The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all =
! http:\\shakesandbacon.yolasite.com <

Anonymous

unread,

Aug 4, 2014, 3:37:52 PM8/4/14

to

+ In fact, there is so much evidence concerning Shakespeare's ^
2 authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a major problem trying to &
- condense it all into a paper of reasonable length. *

3 Search HLAS for: "bloopers part" for mistakes (
# in "Shakespeare, Co-Author" )

%Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author _
@of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup,-
!William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate =
*supported by the historical evidence. +

] http:\\tinyurl.com/cojgwl ||

{ see also

?? http:\\ShakespeareAuthorship.com "
- The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all ;
@ http:\\shakesandbacon.yolasite.com '

marco

unread,

Aug 7, 2014, 9:28:35 AM8/7/14

to

Art N

Cyril Wob Parsnooker

unread,

Aug 13, 2014, 3:52:28 AM8/13/14

to

2 In fact, there is so much evidence concerning Shakespeare's 2
2 authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a major problem trying to +
& condense it all into a paper of reasonable length. +

@ Search HLAS for: "bloopers part" for mistakes ;
" in "Shakespeare, Co&Author" )

?Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author ;
@of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup,&
&William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate +
+supported by the historical evidence. 2

& http:\\tinyurl.com/cojgwl ;;

" see also

?? http:\\ShakespeareAuthorship.com ^
& The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all ^$
@ http:\\shakesandbacon.yolasite.com |#

Doemantray Kamakuma

unread,

Aug 18, 2014, 6:28:46 AM8/18/14

to

1 In fact, there is so much evidence concerning Shakespeare's 1
\ authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a major problem trying to &
2 condense it all into a paper of reasonable length. &

+ Search HLAS for "bloopers part" for mistakes |
" in "Shakespeare, Co-Author" )

? Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author |
+ of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup,2
\ William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate &
& supported by the historical evidence. 1

2 http://tinyurl.com/cojgwl ||

" see also

?? http://ShakespeareAuthorship.com !
2 The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all !$
+ http://shakesandbacon.yolasite.com |#

Giuseppi Stromboli O'Malley

unread,

Aug 22, 2014, 6:58:47 PM8/22/14

to

< In fact, there is so much evidence concerning Shakespeare's <

' authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a major problem trying to ;
) condense it all into a paper of reasonable length. (

* Search HLAS for "bloopers part" for mistakes &
^ in "Shakespeare, Co-Author" %

$ Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author #
# of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup,@
! William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate ~
= supported by the historical evidence. +

~ http://tinyurl.com/cojgwl !!

! see also

## http://ShakespeareAuthorship.com @
$ The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all &^
{ http://shakesandbacon.yolasite.com {[[

G. Gregory Shemp

unread,

Sep 6, 2014, 1:24:07 PM9/6/14

to

@ In fact, there is so much evidence concerning Shakespeare's @
! authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a major problem trying to )
@ condense it all into a paper of reasonable length. *

# Search HLAS for "bloopers part" for mistakes &
% in "Shakespeare, Co-Author" $

^ Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author \
\ of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup,@
) William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate `
( supported by the historical evidence. ~

= http://tinyurl.com/cojgwl ++

- see also

\\ http://ShakespeareAuthorship.com @
% The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all =+
[ http://shakesandbacon.yolasite.com ]{{

Anonymous

unread,

Sep 11, 2014, 4:04:10 PM9/11/14

to

# In fact, there is so much evidence concerning Shakespeare's #
] authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a major problem trying to !
# condense it all into a paper of reasonable length. *

1 Search HLAS for "bloopers part" for mistakes &

% in "Shakespeare, Co-Author" $

^ Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author $
$ of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup,#
! William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate `

( supported by the historical evidence. ~

= http://tinyurl.com/cojgwl \\

- see also

$$ http://ShakespeareAuthorship.com #
% The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all =\
[ http://shakesandbacon.yolasite.com ]{{

Dave U. Random

unread,

Sep 15, 2014, 4:27:35 PM9/15/14

to

$ In fact, there is so much evidence concerning Shakespeare's $
* authorship of Titus 1.1 that it is a major problem trying to #
$ condense it all into a paper of reasonable length. %

2 Search HLAS for "bloopers part" for mistakes &
! in "Shakespeare, Co-Author" ^

^ Despite the many candidates proposed as the "true" author ^
^ of Shakespeare's works by the tin foil hats on this newsgroup,$
# William Shakespeare of Stratford remains the only candidate <

( supported by the historical evidence. ~

= http://tinyurl.com/cojgwl ]]

- see also

^^ http://ShakespeareAuthorship.com $
! The Droeshout portrait isn't unusual at all +]
* http://shakesandbacon.yolasite.com ^$@