(quote)
Bard boosts brain, researchers say
Last Updated: Monday, December 18, 2006 | 6:00 PM ET
CBC News
British researchers using modern medical technology have demonstrated
what generations of teachers have told generations of students:
Shakespeare is good for you.
Reading parts of Shakespeare's plays causes the brain to become
positively excited, researchers from the University of Liverpool said
in a release Monday.
Canadian actor Christopher Plummer as Lear in Shakespeare's King Lear
in 2004.
(Joan Marcus/Associated Press) In particular, Shakespeare's use of a
linguistic technique known as a functional shift, where a part of
speech is employed in an unusual way — a noun might act as a verb, for
example — forces a peak in brain activity.
That makes sense.
Although that would be Bacon *and* Shakespeare's 'linguistic
technique known as the functional shift.' I posted on Prof. Kate
Aughterson's paper which contained a hundred and twenty-examples
of Bacon's nouning verbs, changing the quality of nouns, nouning
adjectives, making neologisms, etc.
One school argued that Bacon was an empirical thinker who
denigrates the imaginative life and the opposing school saw
Bacon as 'a kind of honorary poet.'
~ Kate Aughterson, REDEFINING
THE
PLAIN STYLE: FRANCIS BACON, LINGUISTIC EXTENSION,
AND SEMANTIC CHANGE IN THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING.
It must seem like a double whammy for school kids these days to be
instructed not to depart from writing conventions on graded papers,
but have to deal with Shakespeare's original text and be told it's the
greatest.
I'm afraid schools inculcate language skills for politically correct
candidates for state college paper mills. Good thing Stratman, like
so many gifted and successful authors, must have been an autodidact
improvising language and folklore material for London stage audiences.
> From http://www.cbc.ca/news/story/2006/12/18/shakespeare-brain.html
>
> (quote)
> Bard boosts brain, researchers say
> Last Updated: Monday, December 18, 2006 | 6:00 PM ET
> CBC News
>
> British researchers using modern medical technology have demonstrated
> what generations of teachers have told generations of students:
> Shakespeare is good for you.
>
> Reading parts of Shakespeare's plays causes
> the brain to become positively excited,
--------------------------------------------------------------------
. King Henry V Act 1, Scene 2
CANTERBURY:
Then hear me, gracious sovereign, and you peers,
That owe yourselves, your lives and services
To this imperial throne. There is no bar
To make against your highness' claim to France
But this, which they produce from Pharamond,
'In terram Salicam mulieres ne succedant:'
'No woman shall succeed in Salique land:'
Which Salique land the French unjustly gloze
To be the realm of France, and Pharamond
The founder of this law and female bar.
Yet their own authors faithfully affirm
That the land Salique is in Germany,
Between the floods of Sala and of Elbe;
Where Charles the Great, having subdued the Saxons,
There left behind and settled certain French;
Who, holding in disdain the German women
For some dishonest manners of their life,
Establish'd then this law; to wit, no female
Should be inheritrix in Salique land:
Which Salique, as I said, 'twixt Elbe and Sala,
Is at this day in Germany call'd Meisen.
Then doth it well appear that Salique law
Was not devised for the realm of France:
Nor did the French possess the Salique land
Until four hundred one and twenty years
After defunction of King Pharamond,
Idly supposed the founder of this law;
Who died within the year of our redemption
Four hundred twenty-six; and Charles the Great
Subdued the Saxons, and did seat the French
Beyond the river Sala, in the year
Eight hundred five. Besides, their writers say,
King Pepin, which deposed Childeric,
Did, as heir general, being descended
Of Blithild, which was daughter to King Clothair,
Make claim and title to the crown of France.
Hugh Capet also, who usurped the crown
Of Charles the duke of Lorraine, sole heir male
Of the true line and stock of Charles the Great,
To find his title with some shows of truth,
'Through, in pure truth, it was corrupt and naught,
Convey'd himself as heir to the Lady Lingare,
Daughter to Charlemain, who was the son
To Lewis the emperor, and Lewis the son
Of Charles the Great. Also King Lewis the Tenth,
Who was sole heir to the usurper Capet,
Could not keep quiet in his conscience,
Wearing the crown of France, till satisfied
That fair Queen Isabel, his grandmother,
Was lineal of the Lady Ermengare,
Daughter to Charles the foresaid duke of Lorraine:
By the which marriage the line of Charles the Great
Was re-united to the crown of France.
So that, as clear as is the summer's sun.
King Pepin's title and Hugh Capet's claim,
King Lewis his satisfaction, all appear
To hold in right and title of the female:
So do the kings of France unto this day;
Howbeit they would hold up this Salique law
To bar your highness claiming from the female,
And rather choose to hide them in a net
Than amply to imbar their crooked titles
Usurp'd from you and your progenitors.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
> In particular, Shakespeare's use of a linguistic technique
> known as a functional shift, where a part of speech is
> employed in an unusual way - a noun might act as a verb,
> for example - forces a peak in brain activity.
.
Or an illiterate Stratford boob might act as a ghost or old Adam.
.
Art Neuendorffer
If these British researchers read the postings of Art, Elizabeth,
Michael Martin, willediver, gangleri, Bob G, Ms. Mouse, Paul C., they
would have to add a cavet to their findings.
MM:
This needs to be clarified, I'd say. Scientists often confuse the
brain with the mind. The brain is just a tool of the mind.
Shakespeare was a Saint many times in the past. He brought with him,
many of his former disciples. Some are alive to day, perhaps, and
naturally, they will feel inspired by reading Shakespeare. The style
will seem familiar to them, and they will respond accordingly. Even
those who were not with Shakespeare, but with some other Saint, will
feel a pull, when reading the familiar teachings of Sant Mat.
I notice Elizabeth is still trying to rip off the canon for Bacon.
Bacon didn't need to rip off anyone. He had his flock of sheep, also.
Some of them are living today. They will feel the same sort of
inspiration by reading his works.
The same principle would apply to Marlowe and Donne.
Mind has what is called "sanskaras," or impressions. Some of them are
recent. Some are very old. Some are barely on the surface of the
psyche, while others run deep. It is mind, not the brain which
responds to Saints. Christ said, more or less, "When I whistle, my
sheep come running."
Michael Martin
> book...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > From http://www.cbc.ca/news/story/2006/12/18/shakespeare-brain.html
> >
> >
> > (quote)
> > Bard boosts brain, researchers say
> > Last Updated: Monday, December 18, 2006 | 6:00 PM ET
> > CBC News
> >
> > British researchers using modern medical technology have demonstrated
> > what generations of teachers have told generations of students:
> > Shakespeare is good for you.
>
> If these British researchers read the postings of Art, Elizabeth,
> Michael Martin, willediver,
who?
> gangleri, Bob G, Ms. Mouse, Paul C., they
> would have to add a cavet to their findings.
What's a "cavet"? Someone who looks after recesses in rocks? An
American talk show host?
You're an irredeemable moron. Oh, and I am British.
STOP TROLLING!
<much that was--entirely uncharacteristically--ill-advised>
My dear Art,
Kindly do me a favour: avoid answering my replies to trolls. It
deflects, and it encourages them to troll *even more*.
Thanks In Advance
Mark Houlsby
No, no, keep it up, Seeker! This new guy is just jealous because you
didn't put him on your list!
--Bob G.
You begin to appear disingenuous, tough guy, One minute, you're keen as
the proverbial mustard to describe Sweetie as "thick" and to claim to
defend Crowley's appalling nonsense, next you encourage moronic trolls
to redouble their efforts. You're on a slippery slope, my lad.
--Mark H.
Ok, I hear you, it was just a polite request.
I hope you realise that I *do* respect you. It's trolls and trolling I
dislike. I doubt neither that seeker is hardworking, nor that he is a
Rosicrucian. I'm *equally certain* however, that *he is* a *troll*.
The evidence is irrefutable.
FYI I have never *left* chess land. FYI HLAS *does not* "belong" to you
any more, or any less, than anyone else in the group. Trolls tend to
drive away good people. This is why I tend to be opposed to their
stupidity.
Best regards,
Mark
> Art
I don't deny for one moment that I have been trolling people who have
been trolling.
> If you have written one sentence here about Shakespeare
> (or authorship of same) I think I have missed it.
> .
Indeed you have.
> Why don't you take this opportunity here to do so
> so that we don't think that you are a troll.
> .
Tell you what, I'll post a link to my doing that:
...and another...:
... there are more...but for now here's a couple of links which might
help to explain what's been going on:
...and:
Should you require further explanation, please don't hesitate to
solicit the same.
All the best,
Mark Houlsby
> Art Neuendorffer
> > Art Neuendorffer wrote:
> >
> > > If you have written one sentence here about Shakespeare
> > > (or authorship of same) I think I have missed it.
> .
> Mark Houlsby wrote:
> >
> > Indeed you have.
> >
> > > Why don't you take this opportunity here to do so
> > > so that we don't think that you are a troll.
> .
> Mark Houlsby wrote:
> >
> > Tell you what, I'll post a link to my doing that:
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/y4hpkh
> > http://tinyurl.com/yj3u8n
> > http://tinyurl.com/yygxmc
> >
> > ...and:
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/uj7fd
> .
> All I see is a buncha questions.
> .
Ok, fine.