In article <
906f3249-4dbf-4ab4...@googlegroups.com>,
> On Friday, May 17, 2013 8:01:40 AM UTC-7, John W Kennedy wrote:
> > On 2013-05-17 13:10:34 +0000, neonprose @
gmail.com said:
> >
> IN THIS POST, WEBB WILL GO OFF ABOUT OVID IN YUGOSLAVIA,
> JUST IGNORE HIM, THE ROMAN ARMY SOLVED THE PROBLEM MORE
> THAN FOUR MILENNIA AGO BY SIMPLY DECLARING THE DATE
> (YEAR 400) AND THEN HEADING HOME TO ROME.
WHY DON'T YOU SHOUT IN ALL UPPERCASE FOR A CHANGE? IT MAKES YOUR
"ARGUMENTS" SO MUCH MORE PERSUASIVE. However, there is at least *some*
virtue in it -- since you evidently cannot post without destroying the
automatically supplied quotation hierarchy, at least the practice
distinguishes your words from those of your interlocutors -- not that
your incompetent English did not already achieve the same end.
Incidentally, by the your 400, Ovid had already been dead for
centuries. You just cannot get *anything* right!
> THE REASON, WEBB, THAT OVID WENT TO YUGOSLAVIA
He didn't. Ovid was exiled to the other side of the peninsula, to
Tomis, in what is now Romania. You just cannot get *anything* right!
> (A DIVIDED
> COUNTRY) IS THAT HE WOULD OTHERWISE HAVE BEEN STRANGLED
> IN HIS BATH FOR HAVING AN AFFAIR WITH A WOMAN THE
> EMPEROR ADMIRED.
It is not known why Ovid was exiled.
> > So you admit you're wrong about him trying to escape the plague? Good.
> > Now all we have to deal with is that:
> >
> > A) Yugoslavia did not exist at the time. It did not exist until after
> > World War I.
> The Wikipedia article has the Roman Army at the ports of
> Slavia (see the map) and Yugo (two independent territories)
Rubbish. "Yugo" is simply the adjectival form of the Slavic root
"yug", which means south in virtually all Slavic tongues. From the
Wikipedia article:
"The Kingdom of Yugoslavia, which before 3 October 1929 was known
as the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes was established on
1 December 1918 by the union of the State of Slovenes, Croats and
Serbs and the Kingdom of Serbia (the Kingdom of Montenegro was
annexed on 13 November 1918, and the Conference of Ambassadors
in Paris gave international recognition to the union on 13 July
1922)."
In case you're keeping track, 1 December 1918 is a *long* time after the
fall of the Roman Empire, although that fact may well be news to you.
> with the Roman Army pondering whether it wanted to be
> devastated. It named the territory "Yugo/Slavia and then left
> for Rome.
It did nothing of the kind.
> > B) Ovid was not exiled there, anyway. He was exiled to a city that is
> > now in Romania.
> >
> > C) We do not know why Ovid was exiled.
> He was fooling around with Augustus' daughter, or some
> other woman Augustus had his eye on, so Augustus
> exhiled Ovid.
No, John is quite right. Historians have never established the cause
of Ovid's exile. See the Wikipedia article "Exile of Ovid":
"The exile of Ovid, Latin poet of the Roman Empire, is one of the
most mysterious events of what is now called Classical antiquity.
Traditionally, it is known that in the year 8 CE the poet was
banished from Rome to Tomis (now Constanca, Romania),
[Note: What is now Romania, *not* Yugoslavia -- neither nation even
existed in the Augustan Age.]
"on the shores of the Black Sea, by decree of the emperor Augustus,
but for reasons never definitively answered.[1] The whole experience
of exile is mentioned only by Ovid himself, except a few words by
Pliny the Elder and Stachys. At this time, Tomis was a remote town
on the edge of the civilized world, beyond the Danube, loosely
under the authority of the kingdom of Thrace (a satellite state
of Rome), superficially Hellenized, and where no one, according
to Ovid, could understand a word of Latin. He wrote that the cause
of his own exile was carmen et error "a poem and a mistake", but
critics' interpretation of both factors are widely divergent."
In fact, one suggestion for the cause of Ovid's banishment was his
authorship of _Ars Amatoria_. In fact, the same Wikipedia article lists
various other conjectures concerning the reason for Augustus's action as
well:
--------------------------------------
Moreover, what was the Ovid's mistake? There are many hypotheses for the
scholars, including:
have attended some circles of opposition to the emperor, as that of
Fabius Maximus;
have gone to the house of Augustus at the time that, after learning
of a disaster, suffered an attack of cholera so horrible that Ovid would
ridicule the emperor in epigrams of clandestine movement;
have discovered the incest Augustus had with his daughter Julia;
have been witness to the adultery of Julia;
have conspired with Fabius Maximus to restore the right of
succession imperial Posthumus Agrippa, grandson of Augustus, among
others.
--------------------------------------
You just cannot get *ANYTHING* right.