There are no real distinctive signs, but you've been recorded in your
asault activities which are clearly defined in the United States legal
codes as being 'sufficient cause for incarceration'.
Florida Police, and Military Personnel along with Militant terrorist
groups have not been practicing the Universal Declaration of Human
rights, which was recorded and forwarded to the appropriate financed
by the people authorities.
Definite non adherence to the Genocide Convention any of the following
acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a
national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: killing
members of the group; causing serious bodily or mental harm to members
of the group; deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life,
calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in
part; imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
[and] forcibly transferring children of the group to another
group."[2] Because of the insistence of Joseph Stalin, this definition
of genocide under international law does not include political groups.
[3][4]
Definite non adherence to the United Nations convention against
torture, proof of which was somewhat acquired via video and audio
recordings and signed documentations by Florida Police. Part I
(Articles 1-16) defines torture (Article 1), and commits parties to
taking effective measures to prevent any act of torture in any
territory under their jurisdiction (Article 2). These include ensuring
that torture is a criminal offence (Article 4), establishing
jurisdiction over acts of torture committed by or against a party's
citizens (Article 5), ensuring that torture is an extraditable offence
(Article 8), and establishing universal jurisdiction to try cases of
torture where an alleged torturer cannot be extradited (Article 5).
Parties must promptly investigate any allegation of torture (Articles
12 & 13), and victims of torture must have an enforceable right to
compensation
Definite non adherence to the 1980 Convention on conventional weapons.
[edit] Applicability to States and Individuals
The law of war is binding not only upon States as such but also upon
individuals and, in particular, the members of their armed forces.
Parties are bound by the laws of war to the extent that such
compliance does not interfere with achieving legitimate military
goals. For example, they are obliged to make every effort to avoid
damaging people and property not involved in combat, but they are not
guilty of a war crime if a bomb mistakenly hits a residential area.
By the same token, combatants that intentionally use protected people
or property as shields or camouflage are guilty of violations of laws
of war and are responsible for damage to those that should be
protected
WHICH IN MY HAVING SUCCUMBED TO YOUR WEAPONS ON JANUARY OF 2001, MAKES
YOU RESPONSIBLE. YOU ARE COMMITTING GENOCIDE, EVEN IN THE DICTIONARY
SENSE.
Wedgiewatched
Wedgiewatched