>BTW, after 6 months working with hugin and reading docs, I can't still
>understand what is nona for.
It does geometrical and photometric distortions to photos and writes
the output to image files. The parameters are specified in a .pto
project, i.e. nona doesn't decide what the distortions are going to
be, it just does what it is told to do.
--
Bruno
http://hugin.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/hugin/hugin/trunk/README?revision=3496&view=markup
It's not a great description, but the job nona does isn't very
intuitive. I've put it in http://wiki.panotools.org/Nona so
eventually it will end up in the help/manual, which is more likely
to get read than the README.
--
Bruno
If you think that the README is not read or better not read or better
other docs/manuals should be read, then suggest to delete it to avoid
confusion, no?
Thomas
no! at least one person (Paolo) found it to be (partially) useful. I
rather improve the usefulness of all different tools (in this case,
documentation tools), than limit users to a single arbitrarily form of
documentation that fits only those who think alike (borgs).
long live diversity. resistance is futile, not!
Yuv (4AM, sleepless night, text to be taken with a pinch of salt)