PTBatcherGUI misses an option to terminate GUI after finish

19 views
Skip to first unread message

Thomas Güttler

unread,
Dec 2, 2016, 1:43:35 AM12/2/16
to hugin and other free panoramic software

I am missing an option to terminate the GUI after completing the job. There is an option to
shutdown the computer, but this is not what I want.

In the GUI I can set the needed option. But I want do this for batch processing.

Is there a way to terminate GUI after processing?

Here are the documented command options of my version:

PTBatcherGUI --help
Usage: PTBatcherGUI [-h] [-b] [-o] [-s] [-v] [-a] [Stitch_Projekt.pto [Ausgabe-Präfix]|Assistent_Projekt.pto...]
  -h, --help show this help message
  -b, --batch run batch immediately
  -o, --overwrite overwrite previous files without asking
  -s, --shutdown shutdown computer after batch is complete
  -v, --verbose show verbose output when processing projects
  -a, --assistant run the assistant on the given projects

Version: 2015.0.0+dfsg-1 (Ubuntu 16 LTS)


Related question on launchpad: https://answers.launchpad.net/hugin/+question/404571

T. Modes

unread,
Dec 2, 2016, 11:09:57 AM12/2/16
to hugin and other free panoramic software
Hi,


Am Freitag, 2. Dezember 2016 07:43:35 UTC+1 schrieb Thomas Güttler:

I am missing an option to terminate the GUI after completing the job. There is an option to
shutdown the computer, but this is not what I want.

In the GUI I can set the needed option. But I want do this for batch processing.

Is there a way to terminate GUI after processing?

 This is not the way how PTBatcherGUI (and the old PTBatcher) work. PTBatcherGUI maintains a single queue.
When a first instance of PTBatcherGUI is running the second call to PTBatcherGUI adds the project the queue and returns immediately.
If you want to wait to finish the job then hugin_stitch_project or hugin_executor is more suited.

Version: 2015.0.0+dfsg-1 (Ubuntu 16 LTS)
Current version is 2016.2 (but no changes to PTBatcherGUI command line switches)
 
 One time is enough. Please give some time to answer.

Thomas
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages