Groups
Sign in
Groups
http-state
Conversations
About
Send feedback
Help
http-state
Contact owners and managers
1–30 of 278
Mark all as read
Report group
0 selected
RFC Errata System
8/15/23
[http-state] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6265 (7604)
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6265, "HTTP State Management Mechanism
unread,
[http-state] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6265 (7604)
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6265, "HTTP State Management Mechanism
8/15/23
IETF Executive Director
1/23/23
FINAL REMINDER: Please take the IETF Community Survey for 2022
This is a FINAL reminder to please spare six minutes to provide your feedback on the IETF and your
unread,
FINAL REMINDER: Please take the IETF Community Survey for 2022
This is a FINAL reminder to please spare six minutes to provide your feedback on the IETF and your
1/23/23
IETF Executive Director
1/9/23
REMINDER: Please take the IETF Community Survey for 2022
This is a reminder to please spare six minutes to provide your feedback on the IETF and your
unread,
REMINDER: Please take the IETF Community Survey for 2022
This is a reminder to please spare six minutes to provide your feedback on the IETF and your
1/9/23
Jay Daley
12/19/22
Please take the IETF Community Survey 2022
The IETF Community survey is our major annual survey of everyone subscribed to an IETF mailing list
unread,
Please take the IETF Community Survey 2022
The IETF Community survey is our major annual survey of everyone subscribed to an IETF mailing list
12/19/22
Ciy horn
11/14/22
[http-state] Question regarding RFC 6265
unread,
[http-state] Question regarding RFC 6265
11/14/22
RFC Errata System
10/22/21
[http-state] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6265 (6719)
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6265, "HTTP State Management Mechanism
unread,
[http-state] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6265 (6719)
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6265, "HTTP State Management Mechanism
10/22/21
IETF Executive Director
5/12/21
Final reminder - annual IETF community survey
This is the final reminder about our IETF community survey. This survey is our first attempt to reach
unread,
Final reminder - annual IETF community survey
This is the final reminder about our IETF community survey. This survey is our first attempt to reach
5/12/21
IETF Executive Director
5/6/21
Please share your views in our first annual IETF community survey
Hi I am writing to you from the IETF to ask you to participate in our first annual IETF community
unread,
Please share your views in our first annual IETF community survey
Hi I am writing to you from the IETF to ask you to participate in our first annual IETF community
5/6/21
RFC Errata System
4/12/20
[http-state] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6265 (6093)
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6265, "HTTP State Management Mechanism
unread,
[http-state] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6265 (6093)
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6265, "HTTP State Management Mechanism
4/12/20
Marius Surdeanu
3/29/20
[http-state] Question regarding RFC 6265
unread,
[http-state] Question regarding RFC 6265
3/29/20
RFC Errata System
10/9/18
[http-state] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6265 (5518)
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6265, "HTTP State Management Mechanism
unread,
[http-state] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6265 (5518)
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6265, "HTTP State Management Mechanism
10/9/18
=JeffH
, …
Barry Leiba
3
11/13/15
[http-state] taking further cookie discussion to ietf-http-wg list ? (was: "Revising RFC6265"
>> therefore, I am thinking that we ought to close this http-state@ list to >> further
unread,
[http-state] taking further cookie discussion to ietf-http-wg list ? (was: "Revising RFC6265"
>> therefore, I am thinking that we ought to close this http-state@ list to >> further
11/13/15
Daniel Stenberg
11/13/15
[http-state] "Revising RFC6265"
FYI, Over in http-wg: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2015OctDec/0165.html -- /
unread,
[http-state] "Revising RFC6265"
FYI, Over in http-wg: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2015OctDec/0165.html -- /
11/13/15
Fagner Martins
,
Daniel Stenberg
3
9/7/15
[http-state] Question regarding RFC 6265 and ietf process
It seems that the plus decode handling for php and rack are happening way before the spec was
unread,
[http-state] Question regarding RFC 6265 and ietf process
It seems that the plus decode handling for php and rack are happening way before the spec was
9/7/15
Zhong Yu
,
Gervase Markham
7
6/5/15
Re: [http-state] HTTP cookie processing wrt "public suffixes"
I've written an article explaining cookie domain and public suffix, in which I propose a simple
unread,
Re: [http-state] HTTP cookie processing wrt "public suffixes"
I've written an article explaining cookie domain and public suffix, in which I propose a simple
6/5/15
Zhong Yu
3
5/28/15
[http-state] Browser Behaviors on Cookie Domain and Public Suffix
I will not file the errata at this time; the situation at publicsuffix.org is quite confusing [1] ;
unread,
[http-state] Browser Behaviors on Cookie Domain and Public Suffix
I will not file the errata at this time; the situation at publicsuffix.org is quite confusing [1] ;
5/28/15
=JeffH
4/30/15
Re: [http-state] HTTP cookie processing wrt "public suffixes"
finally published it (man am ia lazy boy).. blog: http://identitymeme.org/archives/2015/04/30/http-
unread,
Re: [http-state] HTTP cookie processing wrt "public suffixes"
finally published it (man am ia lazy boy).. blog: http://identitymeme.org/archives/2015/04/30/http-
4/30/15
Anne van Kesteren
, …
Julian Reschke
3
11/21/14
[http-state] Assumed Vary: Cookie
On 2014-11-21 15:13, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > * Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> RFC 6265 does
unread,
[http-state] Assumed Vary: Cookie
On 2014-11-21 15:13, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > * Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> RFC 6265 does
11/21/14
=JeffH
,
Adam Barth
3
11/13/14
[http-state] HTTP cookie processing wrt "public suffixes"
Thanks to Adam Barth for his comments on this. In terms of the first comment on single-label domain
unread,
[http-state] HTTP cookie processing wrt "public suffixes"
Thanks to Adam Barth for his comments on this. In terms of the first comment on single-label domain
11/13/14
=JeffH
11/9/14
[http-state] publicsuffix.org/list/#specification (aka list format, definitions, algorithm)
I am extracting and reproducing here, the list format, definitions, algorithm description from
unread,
[http-state] publicsuffix.org/list/#specification (aka list format, definitions, algorithm)
I am extracting and reproducing here, the list format, definitions, algorithm description from
11/9/14
RFC Errata System
10/30/14
[http-state] [Errata Verified] RFC6265 (4148)
The following errata report has been verified for RFC6265, "HTTP State Management Mechanism
unread,
[http-state] [Errata Verified] RFC6265 (4148)
The following errata report has been verified for RFC6265, "HTTP State Management Mechanism
10/30/14
RFC Errata System
,
Adam Barth
2
10/29/14
[http-state] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6265 (4148)
Yep, seems right to me. On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 3:13 PM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.
unread,
[http-state] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6265 (4148)
Yep, seems right to me. On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 3:13 PM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.
10/29/14
RFC Errata System
, …
Pierre Lepropre
4
7/14/14
[http-state] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6265 (4044)
Hello Barry, I guess you're right on this one; this is clearly a comment/suggestion of
unread,
[http-state] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6265 (4044)
Hello Barry, I guess you're right on this one; this is clearly a comment/suggestion of
7/14/14
RFC Errata System
, …
Pierre Lepropre
3
7/14/14
[http-state] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6265 (4043)
Hello Adam, I agree the "default-path" is a term-of-art and yes, you are right it would
unread,
[http-state] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6265 (4043)
Hello Adam, I agree the "default-path" is a term-of-art and yes, you are right it would
7/14/14
RFC Errata System
7/12/14
[http-state] [Errata Rejected] RFC6265 (4043)
The following errata report has been rejected for RFC6265, "HTTP State Management Mechanism
unread,
[http-state] [Errata Rejected] RFC6265 (4043)
The following errata report has been rejected for RFC6265, "HTTP State Management Mechanism
7/12/14
RFC Errata System
7/12/14
[http-state] [Errata Rejected] RFC6265 (4044)
The following errata report has been rejected for RFC6265, "HTTP State Management Mechanism
unread,
[http-state] [Errata Rejected] RFC6265 (4044)
The following errata report has been rejected for RFC6265, "HTTP State Management Mechanism
7/12/14
RFC Errata System
3/24/14
[http-state] [Errata Rejected] RFC6265 (3931)
The following errata report has been rejected for RFC6265, "HTTP State Management Mechanism
unread,
[http-state] [Errata Rejected] RFC6265 (3931)
The following errata report has been rejected for RFC6265, "HTTP State Management Mechanism
3/24/14
RFC Errata System
,
Barry Leiba
3
3/24/14
[http-state] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6265 (3931)
> Semyon, you appear to be adding a requirement that parsers pay > attention to the weekday
unread,
[http-state] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6265 (3931)
> Semyon, you appear to be adding a requirement that parsers pay > attention to the weekday
3/24/14
RFC Errata System
, …
Daniel Stenberg
4
10/26/13
[http-state] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6265 (3765)
On Sat, 26 Oct 2013, Barry Leiba wrote: >> The spec says what it says on purpose. Changing the
unread,
[http-state] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6265 (3765)
On Sat, 26 Oct 2013, Barry Leiba wrote: >> The spec says what it says on purpose. Changing the
10/26/13
RFC Errata System
10/26/13
[http-state] [Errata Rejected] RFC6265 (3765)
The following errata report has been rejected for RFC6265, "HTTP State Management Mechanism
unread,
[http-state] [Errata Rejected] RFC6265 (3765)
The following errata report has been rejected for RFC6265, "HTTP State Management Mechanism
10/26/13