http-state

1–30 of 273

0 selected

RFC Errata System

10/22/21

[http-state] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6265 (6719)

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6265, "HTTP State Management Mechanism

unread,

[http-state] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6265 (6719)

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6265, "HTTP State Management Mechanism

10/22/21

IETF Executive Director

5/12/21

Final reminder - annual IETF community survey

This is the final reminder about our IETF community survey. This survey is our first attempt to reach

unread,

Final reminder - annual IETF community survey

This is the final reminder about our IETF community survey. This survey is our first attempt to reach

5/12/21

IETF Executive Director

5/6/21

Please share your views in our first annual IETF community survey

Hi I am writing to you from the IETF to ask you to participate in our first annual IETF community

unread,

Please share your views in our first annual IETF community survey

Hi I am writing to you from the IETF to ask you to participate in our first annual IETF community

5/6/21

RFC Errata System

4/12/20

[http-state] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6265 (6093)

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6265, "HTTP State Management Mechanism

unread,

[http-state] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6265 (6093)

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6265, "HTTP State Management Mechanism

4/12/20

Marius Surdeanu

3/29/20

[http-state] Question regarding RFC 6265

unread,

[http-state] Question regarding RFC 6265

3/29/20

RFC Errata System

10/9/18

[http-state] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6265 (5518)

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6265, "HTTP State Management Mechanism

unread,

[http-state] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6265 (5518)

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6265, "HTTP State Management Mechanism

10/9/18

=JeffH, … Barry Leiba3

11/13/15

[http-state] taking further cookie discussion to ietf-http-wg list ? (was: "Revising RFC6265"

>> therefore, I am thinking that we ought to close this http-state@ list to >> further

unread,

[http-state] taking further cookie discussion to ietf-http-wg list ? (was: "Revising RFC6265"

>> therefore, I am thinking that we ought to close this http-state@ list to >> further

11/13/15

Daniel Stenberg

11/13/15

[http-state] "Revising RFC6265"

FYI, Over in http-wg: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2015OctDec/0165.html -- /

unread,

[http-state] "Revising RFC6265"

FYI, Over in http-wg: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2015OctDec/0165.html -- /

11/13/15

Fagner Martins, Daniel Stenberg3

9/7/15

[http-state] Question regarding RFC 6265 and ietf process

It seems that the plus decode handling for php and rack are happening way before the spec was

unread,

[http-state] Question regarding RFC 6265 and ietf process

It seems that the plus decode handling for php and rack are happening way before the spec was

9/7/15

Zhong Yu, Gervase Markham7

6/5/15

Re: [http-state] HTTP cookie processing wrt "public suffixes"

I've written an article explaining cookie domain and public suffix, in which I propose a simple

unread,

Re: [http-state] HTTP cookie processing wrt "public suffixes"

I've written an article explaining cookie domain and public suffix, in which I propose a simple

6/5/15

5/28/15

[http-state] Browser Behaviors on Cookie Domain and Public Suffix

I will not file the errata at this time; the situation at publicsuffix.org is quite confusing [1] ;

unread,

[http-state] Browser Behaviors on Cookie Domain and Public Suffix

I will not file the errata at this time; the situation at publicsuffix.org is quite confusing [1] ;

5/28/15

4/30/15

Re: [http-state] HTTP cookie processing wrt "public suffixes"

finally published it (man am ia lazy boy).. blog: http://identitymeme.org/archives/2015/04/30/http-

unread,

Re: [http-state] HTTP cookie processing wrt "public suffixes"

finally published it (man am ia lazy boy).. blog: http://identitymeme.org/archives/2015/04/30/http-

4/30/15

Anne van Kesteren, … Julian Reschke3

11/21/14

[http-state] Assumed Vary: Cookie

On 2014-11-21 15:13, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > * Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> RFC 6265 does

unread,

[http-state] Assumed Vary: Cookie

On 2014-11-21 15:13, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > * Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> RFC 6265 does

11/21/14

=JeffH, Adam Barth3

11/13/14

[http-state] HTTP cookie processing wrt "public suffixes"

Thanks to Adam Barth for his comments on this. In terms of the first comment on single-label domain

unread,

[http-state] HTTP cookie processing wrt "public suffixes"

Thanks to Adam Barth for his comments on this. In terms of the first comment on single-label domain

11/13/14

11/9/14

[http-state] publicsuffix.org/list/#specification (aka list format, definitions, algorithm)

I am extracting and reproducing here, the list format, definitions, algorithm description from

unread,

[http-state] publicsuffix.org/list/#specification (aka list format, definitions, algorithm)

I am extracting and reproducing here, the list format, definitions, algorithm description from

11/9/14

RFC Errata System

10/30/14

[http-state] [Errata Verified] RFC6265 (4148)

The following errata report has been verified for RFC6265, "HTTP State Management Mechanism

unread,

[http-state] [Errata Verified] RFC6265 (4148)

The following errata report has been verified for RFC6265, "HTTP State Management Mechanism

10/30/14

RFC Errata System, Adam Barth2

10/29/14

[http-state] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6265 (4148)

Yep, seems right to me. On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 3:13 PM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.

unread,

[http-state] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6265 (4148)

Yep, seems right to me. On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 3:13 PM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.

10/29/14

RFC Errata System, … Pierre Lepropre4

7/14/14

[http-state] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6265 (4044)

Hello Barry, I guess you're right on this one; this is clearly a comment/suggestion of

unread,

[http-state] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6265 (4044)

Hello Barry, I guess you're right on this one; this is clearly a comment/suggestion of

7/14/14

RFC Errata System, … Pierre Lepropre3

7/14/14

[http-state] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6265 (4043)

Hello Adam, I agree the "default-path" is a term-of-art and yes, you are right it would

unread,

[http-state] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6265 (4043)

Hello Adam, I agree the "default-path" is a term-of-art and yes, you are right it would

7/14/14

RFC Errata System

7/12/14

[http-state] [Errata Rejected] RFC6265 (4043)

The following errata report has been rejected for RFC6265, "HTTP State Management Mechanism

unread,

[http-state] [Errata Rejected] RFC6265 (4043)

The following errata report has been rejected for RFC6265, "HTTP State Management Mechanism

7/12/14

RFC Errata System

7/12/14

[http-state] [Errata Rejected] RFC6265 (4044)

The following errata report has been rejected for RFC6265, "HTTP State Management Mechanism

unread,

[http-state] [Errata Rejected] RFC6265 (4044)

The following errata report has been rejected for RFC6265, "HTTP State Management Mechanism

7/12/14

RFC Errata System

3/24/14

[http-state] [Errata Rejected] RFC6265 (3931)

The following errata report has been rejected for RFC6265, "HTTP State Management Mechanism

unread,

[http-state] [Errata Rejected] RFC6265 (3931)

The following errata report has been rejected for RFC6265, "HTTP State Management Mechanism

3/24/14

RFC Errata System, Barry Leiba3

3/24/14

[http-state] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6265 (3931)

> Semyon, you appear to be adding a requirement that parsers pay > attention to the weekday

unread,

[http-state] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6265 (3931)

> Semyon, you appear to be adding a requirement that parsers pay > attention to the weekday

3/24/14

RFC Errata System, … Daniel Stenberg4

10/26/13

[http-state] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6265 (3765)

On Sat, 26 Oct 2013, Barry Leiba wrote: >> The spec says what it says on purpose. Changing the

unread,

[http-state] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6265 (3765)

On Sat, 26 Oct 2013, Barry Leiba wrote: >> The spec says what it says on purpose. Changing the

10/26/13

RFC Errata System

10/26/13

[http-state] [Errata Rejected] RFC6265 (3765)

The following errata report has been rejected for RFC6265, "HTTP State Management Mechanism

unread,

[http-state] [Errata Rejected] RFC6265 (3765)

The following errata report has been rejected for RFC6265, "HTTP State Management Mechanism

10/26/13

RFC Errata System, … Dave Thaler12

8/7/13

[http-state] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6265 (3663)

Edited version looks good to me. Thanks, -Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: barryleiba@

unread,

[http-state] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6265 (3663)

Edited version looks good to me. Thanks, -Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: barryleiba@

8/7/13

johnson...@hushmail.com

4/27/13

[http-state] Biggest Fake Conference in Computer Science

Biggest Fake Conference in Computer Science We are researchers from different parts of the world and

unread,

[http-state] Biggest Fake Conference in Computer Science

Biggest Fake Conference in Computer Science We are researchers from different parts of the world and

4/27/13

Zhong Yu, Adam Barth4

4/1/13

[http-state] Cookie path and trailing "/"

Never mind, there's already a bug - https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=537207 I agree

unread,

[http-state] Cookie path and trailing "/"

Never mind, there's already a bug - https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=537207 I agree

4/1/13

RFC Errata System, … Julian Reschke18

1/28/13

[http-state] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6265 (3444)

On 2013-01-28 17:26, Pete Resnick wrote: > Getting back to an earlier conversation: > > On 1

unread,

[http-state] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6265 (3444)

On 2013-01-28 17:26, Pete Resnick wrote: > Getting back to an earlier conversation: > > On 1

1/28/13

RFC Errata System, … Zhong Yu5

12/17/12

[http-state] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6265 (3430)

On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Dan Winship <dan.winship@gmail.com> wrote: > On 12/14/2012

unread,

[http-state] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6265 (3430)

On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Dan Winship <dan.winship@gmail.com> wrote: > On 12/14/2012

12/17/12

Search

Clear search

Close search

Google apps

Main menu