So devil's advocate, the obligation to love and cherish, assume that
the offense was against you. You are directly being harmed by it, say
by harrassment, assault, theft, or otherwise. The kids are still
safe, but you or your property are somewhat in danger. Does that
change your outlook or does the same rule apply that you have an
obligation to love those that despitefully use you and does that mean
not turning the significant other in?
As to kids, I am learning that all kids are different - just with my
job...one little kid I talked to was the perfect angel while his
parents where getting divorced, and in talking to his therapist, I
found out that the kid blamed his parent's divorce on his own bad
behavior and so was trying to be perfect so his parents would get back
together (surprisingly not too uncommon a reaction). Other kids the
same age rebel and develop severe hatred for one or both of their
parents and others do not seem to be that impacted by the situation.
Still, what the kids do and what they should do are separate things.
That it is difficult to do what you should do, does not change that it
should be done. As a parent, I know my kid is not perfect, nor is my
parenting. Still, I think there is a right answer - even if I do not
know what that is right now. So my question is whether your response
indicates what you think someone should do, or just what you yourself
would do -- Understand that I admit readily that there are things I
should do that I have no intention of doing (giving blood for
example). So, ignoring the need to explain yourself to your child -
the harm that comes to you, should you rat her out?
> > front of the child. What would you do?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -