R1037D YC2

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Anastasia Lyalenko

unread,
Apr 7, 2015, 9:27:32 PM4/7/15
to Barbara C. Jobst, Andy Connolly, Ashlee A. Robbins, Peter Horak, hospital...@googlegroups.com
Dr. Jobst,

Attached, find the report for R1037D's YC2 at LOTD1-2. The subject performed well on 29.2% of stimulation trials and 20.8% of nonstimulation trials. The difference is not significant with a p = 0.5.

Best,
Anastasia

--
Anastasia Lyalenko
Research Specialist
University of Pennsylvania
RAM_YC2_R1037D_s2_report.pdf

Anastasia Lyalenko

unread,
Apr 10, 2015, 10:08:31 AM4/10/15
to Barbara C. Jobst, Andy Connolly, Ashlee A. Robbins, Peter Horak, hospital...@googlegroups.com
Dr. Jobst,

Attached, find the report for R1037D's two sessions of YC2 with stimulation at LOTD1-2. The subject performed well 25% of the time in both stimulation and nonstimulation trials. This results in a p = 1.0. The full report can be found on box.
RAM_YC2_R1037D_s24.pdf

Deborah Levy

unread,
Apr 10, 2015, 11:31:18 PM4/10/15
to Barbara C. Jobst, Andy Connolly, Ashlee A. Robbins, Peter Horak, hospital...@googlegroups.com
Dr. Jobst,

Please find attached the report for R1037D's three sessions of YC2 with stimulation at LOTD1-2. The current was lowered from 1 mA to 0.5 mA in the most recent session. The subject performed well on 48.6% of stimulated trials and 51.4% of non-stimulated trials, with a p=0.74. 

Best,
Deb


--
Deb Levy
RAM_YC2_R1037D_custom_report.pdf
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages