Discrepancies between potentials when using md.charge.pppm
81 views
Skip to first unread message
Sahar
unread,
Feb 16, 2021, 8:31:34 PM2/16/21
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Sign in to report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to hoomd...@googlegroups.com
Hi,
I am running atomistic MD simulations using the OPLS-AA force fields and md.charge.pppm method for long-range electrostatics, but the potential-energy in the log file doesn't match with the sum of all interactions which are bond, angle, dihedral, lj, special lj, special coul, ewald, and pppm energy. So,
the potential_energy and sum of all interactions are not equal except for the first timestep and also when pppm is disabled.
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Sign in to report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to hoomd...@googlegroups.com
Sahar,
Thanks for reporting. I have received multiple reports of this behavior. I think it is a bug in the way `potential_energy` and/or the pppm energy is reported to the logger, but I am not certain. I have asked the developer of the code to investigate.
------
Joshua A. Anderson, Ph.D.
Research Area Specialist, Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan