On Sep 15, 2015, at 11:39 AM, Fred Uleman <
ful...@jpnres.com> wrote:
>
> Would you capitalize Texas State? California State?
Chicago Manual of Style 7.40 (14th edition): Yes, in fact you would, though the exact form should depend on the proper name of each state. The two examples in 7.40 are "Washington State" but "the State of California." When I was editing Asian Survey, formal names of internal political divisions in all countries were always capitalized based on 7.40, hence Chiba Prefecture, etc. (and again there are examples in 7.40, though not of Japanese units specifically). Similarly, I can't think of any academic writing on Japan in which you don't see this. The same goes for rivers, lakes, oceans, etc. Nothing to do with the Japanese government; everything to do with standard editing conventions (the problem there is more one of resisting the urge to write, for example, Sumidagawa River instead of Sumida River). I can't find my AP Style Manual to see how they handle it, but this be how CMOS handles it.
And back to the original post, it gets complicated as CMOS 7.43 in the 14th ed. made a switch in recommended practices. "The University of Chicago Press now recommends that when a generic term is used in the plural either before and after more than one proper name, the term should be capitalized if, in the singular form and in the same position, it would be recognized as part of each name. Formerly such plural terms were capitalized on when preceding the proper names.
Lakes Erie and Huron
Mounts Everest and Rainier
the Adirondack and Catskill Mountains
the Hudson and MIssissippi Rivers
but
the rivers Hudson and Mississippi"
I still go by the old style and would write "Chiba and Saitama prefectures," but there's the argument for "Chiba and Saitama Prefectures." Maybe in newer eds. of CMOS there are more changes--anyone with a more recent edition at hand care to pipe in?
Muddying the waters,
Carl
**********
Carl Freire
Tokyo
mailing list address:
cpfl...@carlfreire.com