St. Mary's Monastery
unread,Apr 4, 2026, 4:16:54 PMApr 4Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to holyrule
+PAX
Br. Jerome Leo’s Daily Reflection on the Holy Rule
April 5, August 5,
December 5
Chapter 53: On the Reception of
Guests (16-24)
Let
there be a separate kitchen for the Abbot and guests that the brethren may not
be disturbed when guests, who are never lacking in a monastery, arrive at
irregular hours. Let two brethren capable of filling the office well be
appointed for a year to have charge of this kitchen. Let them be given such
help as they need, that they may serve without murmuring. And on the other
hand, when they have less to occupy them, let them go out to whatever work is
assigned them. And not only in their case but in all the offices of the
monastery let this arrangement be observed, that when help is needed it be
supplied, and again when the workers are unoccupied they do whatever they are
bidden. The guest house also shall be assigned to a brother whose soul is
possessed by the fear of God. Let there be a sufficient number of beds made up
in it; and let the house of God be managed by prudent men and in a prudent
manner. On no account shall anyone who is not so ordered associate or converse
with guests. But if he should meet them or see them, let him greet them humbly,
as we have said, ask their blessing and pass on, saying that he is not allowed
to converse with a guest.
REFLECTION
It is the
last part which strikes me. Many monasteries no longer enforce it
strictly. However, it brings to mind a rule of thumb that may be applied in other
situations. Like any rule of thumb, there may be exceptions, but watch
the reactions
of monastics whose silence or enclosure is intruded upon very carefully.
You can learn a lot about the monastic in question from them.
When the
reaction makes the guest (who, after all, probably didn't know any better,)
feel dirty or small or terribly wrong, you can safely guess that the monastic in
question has some growing up to do. I have never seen a truly holy and wise
monastic react in such a way, never.
Silence and
enclosure are very effective tools, but they are means to an end. They can
never be ends in themselves. The holy use of these tools is quite
likely to produce wonderful results, but their unholy use can be just
as likely to stall progress and growth outright.
Look at the
many Desert Father accounts of guests arriving unexpectedly. The elder dropped
fast, silence and everything, entertaining with gratitude. Now and then one sees
a different
response, a very cold response, when the elder KNOWS the intentions of the
guest are flawed, but we rarely know such things
about
guests.
We are
called to bear all things, ALL things sweetly and without a lot of fuss. That
does not mean we have to like them, merely that we have to be cheerful
about them and hide our displeasure.
There is
possibly a good deal more grace in the smiling acceptance of an annoyance
than there would be in lofty, untrammeled, silent prayer. God permitted that
disturbance to come to us. What we make of its potential boon is our own affair
and, sometimes, our own maturity, as well.
Br. Jerome Leo Hughes, OSB (RIP)