St. Mary's Monastery
unread,Dec 26, 2025, 8:06:32 PM12/26/25Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to holyrule
+PAX
Br. Jerome Leo’s Daily Reflection on the Holy Rule
April 27, August 27,
December 27
Chapter 69: That the Monks Presume Not to Defend One Another
Care must be taken that no monk presume on any ground to defend another monk in
the monastery, or as it were to take him under his protection, even though they
be united by some tie of blood-relationship. Let not the monks dare to do this
in any way whatsoever, because it may give rise to most serious scandals. But
if anyone breaks this rule, let him be severely punished.
REFLECTION
We
are all supposed to bear one another's burdens. That should be more than enough
help for anyone, if we actually keep that principle. A big problem with
becoming the protector of another, self-appointed or otherwise is that it
destroys one's peace needlessly. When I was a novice, there was one other
novice I really did not want to lose. He was not the brightest bulb on the tree
and I went out of my way to protect him from himself. In time, he came to
resent this and I was so busy worrying about covering or preventing his foibles
all the time that I spent little time focusing on my own novitiate. Of course,
he left. He was supposed to leave. I, however, could not see that at the time.
This isn't just about monasteries; it's about any human group. Taking someone
under our wing can result in all sorts of false assumptions. It can fool us
into thinking we can really control events more than we can. It can lead us, a
la Mother Hen, to seek to control the one under wing in very unnecessary and
unhealthy ways. Its most common error is also one of its most dangerous ones:
it leads us to think in terms of "us-and-them." There is no
"them" in a healthy monastery or family or Christian community, only
an "us".
As usual, what the Holy Rule insists we avoid is an extreme. This chapter is
NOT saying we should not look out for one another, just that no one should
presume that the job is hers alone. Good families protect all their members,
but it is a corporate activity, something in which all participate. Destroy
that balance and the others will notice quickly. It upsets the inner peace,
both of the individual and the group.
Part of any monastic's struggle, in cloister or in the world, is the painful
facing up to ourselves, that confrontation with our own flaws. This difficult
self-knowledge is essential to the monastic way. Trying to protect someone from
this process is counter to the very reason they came. It not only harms them,
it harms us. It keeps us so busy with another's affairs that we can avoid
looking at our own failings: a distraction we may perilously cherish!
Merton once told his junior monk students that there is an existential place of
loneliness in every monk that no one can touch, and that this is the way it's
supposed to be, that no one should try to reach it. That's where the struggle
goes on, that's where there is only God and the self. That's the arena in which
the action happens.
Every person, every employee, every spouse and child has a similar place: it is
the place of great potential learning and growth. Our deep respect for one
another must stand away from that space. Becoming self-appointed guardians of
another violates that space.
Br. Jerome Leo Hughes, OSB (RIP)