St. Mary's Monastery
unread,Dec 25, 2025, 4:38:24 PM12/25/25Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to holyrule
+PAX
Br. Jerome Leo’s Daily Reflection on the Holy Rule
April 26, August 26,
December 26
Chapter 68: If a Sister Is Commanded to Do Impossible Things
If
it happens that difficult or impossible tasks are laid on a sister, let her
nevertheless receive the order of the one in authority with all meekness and
obedience. But if she sees that the weight of the burden altogether exceeds the
limit of her strength, let her submit the reasons for her inability to the one
who is over her in a quiet way and at an opportune time, without pride,
resistance, or contradiction. And if after these representations the Superior
still persists in her decision and command, let the subject know that this is
for her good, and let her obey out of love, trusting in the help of God.
REFLECTION
The method given here for approaching one's superior is a masterpiece of crisis
intervention and prevention for almost any situation in life: "...in a
quiet way and at an opportune time, without pride, resistance, or
contradiction."
We ought to carve that on the walls of every mediation center in the world, on
the doors to every marriage counselor and above every complaint desk (or, as
they euphemize them these days, "Customer Service," but what's in a
name?)
Look at what is called for here: composure and calm, timing, respect for the
other person (Gandhi would even say love for the foe,) non-violence and
non-contentiousness. Use this approach with disagreements and many of them will
melt away. One reason Gandhi's non-violence worked was that he employed all of
these things, the opponent was never denied her worth or dignity. When his
followers pared the list, they failed. This is the recipe for lasting results,
not for a temporary subjugation.
Jesus, of course, gives us a three step process to redress wrongs: go to the
person alone, if that doesn't work go with a witness, if even that fails, then
haul them up before the whole assembly. We can consider ourselves absolved if
we follow all those steps and may feel justified, but if we undertake ANY of
those steps, especially the first one, without the calm prescribed by St.
Benedict, our effort is all but guaranteed to fail. We can sputter out: "I
went to her and I got NOWHERE!" Ah, yes, but HOW did you go? "He
wouldn't even listen to the whole community!" Neither would you, if made
to feel that small and worthless in public.
Very often our manner of dealing with others says a great deal about how we
esteem ourselves. A balanced dignity and self-love is shown in the Holy Rule's
approach. It will go a longer way toward ending conflict than a "wronged
prima donna" move. Sometimes prima donnas of either gender are filled with
angry self-hatred.
Watch people fight and it will be easy to see that many consider any slight or
offense against themselves to be THE original sin. Sigh... Give people like
that a lot of room. Being wrong is not a capital offense, everybody does it at
one time or another. People who demonstrate anything else by their actions
damage their own standing in the group as well, and rightly so.
Remember that every disagreement hurts the whole group. A family at dinner with
two not speaking is a tense affair. You cannot calm a child by saying
"This is between your Father and me! It has nothing to do with you."
But it does, it really does. A community in choir after a huge blow-up between
two members is not an exquisite taste of mystical prayer. Everybody suffers.
That's why fixing these fender-benders is so important and why St. Benedict
gave us a way that is so very likely to achieve results.
Now THAT'S creative peacemaking!
Br. Jerome Leo Hughes, OSB (RIP)