St. Mary's Monastery
unread,Sep 12, 2026, 5:50:44 PM (9 days ago) Sep 12Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to holyrule
+PAX
Br. Jerome Leo’s Daily Reflection on the Holy Rule
January 13, May 14,
September 13
Chapter 2: What Kind of Person the Abbess Ought to Be (23-29)
In her teaching the Abbess should always follow the Apostle's formula:
"Reprove, entreat, rebuke" (2 Tim. 4:2); threatening at one time and
coaxing at another as the occasion may require, showing now the stern
countenance of a mistress, now the loving affection of a mother. That is to
say, it is the undisciplined and restless whom she must reprove rather sharply;
it is the obedient, meek and patient whom she must entreat to advance in
virtue; while as for the negligent and disdainful, these we charge her to
rebuke and correct. And let her not shut her eyes to the faults of offenders;
but, since she has the authority, let her cut out those faults by the roots as
soon as they begin to appear, remembering the fate of Heli, the priest of Silo
(1 Kings 2-4). The well-disposed and those of good understanding let her
correct with verbal admonition the first and second time. But bold, hard, proud
and disobedient characters she should curb at the very beginning of their
ill-doing by stripes and other bodily punishments, knowing that it is written, "the
fool is not corrected with words" (Prov. 18:2; 29:19), and again,
"Beat your son with the rod, and you will deliver his soul from
death"(Prov. 23:13-14).
REFLECTION
Again, this is for all of us, not just Abbots!
I'll bet that many of us have, at one time or another, had to deal with someone
whose initial response to others was often a sharp, full-force rebuke. That
tends to stun people with its severity, a severity which is out of line, or we
wouldn't be surprised at all!
There are three provisions here: "reprove, entreat, rebuke." They
have the weight of Scripture as well as that of the Holy Rule. All three are
necessary and, except for the most truly extraordinary cases, all three are
necessary in that order.
I think most monastic people who have been listening to God and truly examining
themselves tend to be gentle. That's fine, but stopping permanently at either
of the gentle points can win one the disgust of a community in a big hurry. We
tend to pity weak incompetence for a while, then we come to loathe it. The
Truth we look at, look for and strive to learn absolutely demands that when
needed, our authority will have teeth, no matter how unpleasant that may be to
us.
To exercise that rebuke factor all the time, or to fail it out of reticence or
distaste is an awful failure in self-control, self-denial and ascesis. We need
all three modes in our tool kits. Were that not the case, the Holy Spirit would
have never bothered to aid both Sts. Paul and Benedict in putting them there!
Br. Jerome Leo Hughes, OSB (RIP)