FW: CREATING THE EXCLUSIVE IRS RECORD FOR REVIEW, ASK ME HOW?

[Luis Ewing]

From Luis Ewing at [rcwcodebuster (at) gmail.com] or [rcwcodebuster
(at) live.com] or [rcwcodebuster (at) comcast.net] or [rcwcodebuster
(at) hotmail.com] or [rcwcodebuster (at) yahoo.com] or [rcwcodebuster
(at) aol.com] or [rcwcodebuster (at) mail.com] or telephone: (253)
226-3741 or (360) 353-4846 or call me on SKYPE at [luisewing]

(Note: Please copy and paste all 7 of my e-mail addresses listed above
& below and ADD them to your CONTACTS FOLDER.)


I have 7 different e-mail addresses under [rcwcodebuster @ the
following 7 internet providers:


a.) comcast.net>
b.) yahoo.com>
c.) gmail.com>
d.) hotmail.com>
e.) aol.com>
f.) live.com>
g.) mail.com.


Web Sites under construction: [www.luisewing.com] or
[www.ultimateusers.com]



SUBJECT: CAN LUIS EWING’S NEW FOIA RELIANCE DEFENSE PACKAGE HELP ME IF
I HAVE ALREADY BEEN INDICTED AND AM SCHEDULED TO GO TO TRIAL????



To answer your questions:


1.) Yes, we can make the IRS “liable” pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 556 (d) by
using FOIA to make them produce the documents which will place the
burden of proof on them based upon the following:


In pursuance of the Administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C. 554, I
have put the burden of Proof 5 U.S.C. 556 (d) and 26 U.S.C. 6201 (3)
(d) and/or it’s identical but separate provision in the . . .
“Internal Revenue Code of 1986” . . . and/or . . . “any former
internal revenue law” . . . and/or “any subsequent internal revenue
law” . . . on the Secretary of the Treasury Department and/or his
authorized delegate pursuant to the following to wit:

“554. Adjudications
(b) Persons entitled to notice of an agency hearing shall be timely
informed of –
(1) the time, place, and nature of the hearing;
(2) the legal authority and jurisdiction under
which the hearing is to be held; and
(3) the matters of fact and law asserted.”

and:
“556 (d). Except as otherwise provided by statute, the proponent of
a rule or order has the burden of proof. . . .”

and:
“. . . A sanction may not be imposed or rule or order issued except
on consideration of the whole record or those parts cited by a party
and supported by and in accordance with the reliable, probative, and
substantial evidence.”

and:
“. . . A party is entitled to present his case or defense by oral or
documentary evidence, to submit rebuttal evidence, and to conduct
such cross-examination as may be required for a full and true
disclosure of the facts.”

and:
“556 (e). The transcripts of testimony and exhibits, together with
all papers and requests filed in the proceeding, constitutes the
exclusive record for decision in accordance with section 557 of this
title . . . “


5 U.S.C. 556 (d) CLEARLY STATES THAT A SANCTION MAY NOT BE IMPOSED OR
RULE OR ORDER ISSUED EXCEPT ON CONSIDERATION OF THE WHOLE RECORD!!!!

Would a prosecution by the IRS or DOJ be considered a . . .
SANCTION????

Can the COURT issue a . . . SANCTION . . . or an . . . ORDER . . .
without considering . . . THE WHOLE RECORD????

So why don’t we . . . CREATE A RECORD . . . with my . . . (NEW FOIA
RELIANCE DEFENSE PACKAGE) . . . BEFORE YOU GET CONVICTED . . . and
prevent yourself from going to . . . PRISON!!!!


YES, WE CAN CREATE . . . “THE EXCLUSIVE RECORD FOR REVIEW.”



A 5 U.S.C. 556 (d) CLEARLY STATES THAT A PARTY IS ENTITLED TO PRESENT
HIS CASE OR DEFENSE BY ORAL OR DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE TO SUBMIT REBUTTAL
EVIDENCE AND TO CONDUCT SUCH CROSS EXAMINATION AS MAY BE REQUIRED FOR
A FULL AND TRUE DISCLOSURE OF THE FACTS.


How can you present your case by oral or . . . DOCUMENTARY
EVIDENCE . . . to show the court that the IRS has NOT complied with
ALL ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS . . . if you have NOT
yet . . . CREATED YOUR OWN RECORD . . . with my . . . (NEW FOIA
RELIANCE DEFENSE PACKAGE)????


How can you submit . . . REBUTTAL EVIDENCE . . . if you do NOT have
certified registered mail receipts to prove that you have submitted
my . . . (NEW FOIA RELIANCE DEFENSE PACKAGE . . . for the . . .
DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE . . . which you don’t have yet. . . forcing the
IRS to prove that they gave you all the proper . . . NOTICES . . .
NOTICES AND DEMANDS FOR MONEY . . . NOTICES AND DEMANDS THAT YOU FILE
YOUR RETURNS . . . NOTICES AND DEMANDS THAT YOU PAY OVER THE TAX THEY
SAY THAT YOU OW . . . and most importantly . . . NOTICES OF YOUR
RIGHTS TO A HEARING . . . under many different statutes that I have
compiled in my . . . NEW FOIA RELIANCE DEFENSE PACKAGE????


How can you . . . CROSS-EXAMINE . . . THE IRS . . . at trial or at any
CDP HEARING . . . or . . . TAX COURT HEARING . . . and how can you ask
them to provide . . . THE DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE . . . to show . . . THE
COURT . . . that they have NOT complied with all the required
administrative procedures . . . BEFORE . . .they moved to prosecute
you when you don’t have the right documents to challenge them with????

How can you do any of those things if you don’t even know what
documents to ask for in your FOIA request?


* * *


Another thing, you might only be at . . . “THE NOTICE OF
DEFICIENCY” . . . stage of the proceedings.

Here is what I propose that we do . . . AFTER . . . you purchase 1 of
my many FOIA packages:

Look at your “notice of deficiency” letter and you will see that it
has a section or box or line where it asks you to provide them with an
ANSWER or a REASON . . . WHY YOU THINK THAT YOU ARE NOT LIABLE????

Hint: NOBODY in the entire TAX MOVEMENT is responding to that
question!!!!

After the IRS fails to provide some of the . . . SECRET THINGS . . . I
am not going to tell you about yet, I can write that letter telling
them . . . WHY YOU ARE NOT LIABLE!!!!

After the IRS fails to provide some of the . . . SECRET THINGS . . . I
am not going to tell you about yet, I can write that letter . . .
and . . . DEMAND . . . that they CORRECT YOUR MISTAKEN STATUS AS A TAX
PAYER!!!!

Yes, I will charge separately to write those 2 letter’s!

But I will NOT write either letter until after you do 1 of my FOIA
programs!

Those who expect to reap the blessing of liberty must undergo the
fatigue of supporting it.” Thomas Paine


* * *


How can you present your case by oral or . . . DOCUMENTARY
EVIDENCE . . . or . . . submit . . . REBUTTAL EVIDENCE . . . or . . .
CROSS-EXAMINE . . . THE IRS . . . at . . . TRIAL . . . or at any . . .
CDP HEARING . . . or . . . TAX COURT HEARING . . . when you do NOT
have any RECORDS to challenge them with?

How could you do that if you have NOT yet submitted the PROPER type of
FOIA asking for all the necessary and proper . . . DOCUMENTARY
EVIDENCE . . . that you don’t have yet????

What good is your FOIA when you don’t even know which documents to ask
for?

What good is your “TAX GURU” . . . or . . . “TAX RETURN TEAM’S” . . .
FOIA . . . when he or she doesn’t even know what documents to ask
for????

And even if you did have some important documents such as
your . . .INDIVIDUAL MASTER FILE . . . BUSINESS MASTER FILE . . . NON-
MASTER FILE TRANSCRIPTS . . . what good are they if you don’t what to
do with them?

How can your . . . “IRS GURU” . . . or . . . “TAX RETURN TEAM” . . .
even try to help you when they don’t even know which codes or statutes
they are using against you????

“Let them alone, they be the blind leaders of the blind: and if the
blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch.” Mathew 15:14

Have you been used and burned by Mr. Pete Hendrickson’s Cracking the
Code method of a form 1040 and a form 4852?

“Let them alone, they be the blind leaders of the blind: and if the
blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch.” Mathew 15:14

Is you paycheck being pirated after using . . . “PAYCHECK
PIRACY” . . . or . . . “PREFERRED SERVICES” . . . “BOGUS STOP
WITHHOLDING FORMS”????

“Let them alone, they be the blind leaders of the blind: and if the
blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch.” Mathew 15:14

What good is your . . . IMF . . . BMF . . and your . . . NMF . . . if
you or your . . . “TAX DISHONESTY GURU” . . . or your . . . “TAX
RETURN TEAM” . . . don’t know how to get them into evidence????

Which Code or Statute are they using against you, do you know????

What good is your . . . “TAX DISHONESTY GURU” . . . or your . . . “TAX
RETURN TEAM’s” . . . advice when they don’t even know which Code or
Statute they are using against you????

This is . . . WHY . . . YOU NEED . . . MY NEW FOIA RELIANCE DEFENSE
PACKAGE . . . BEFORE IT’S TOO LATE!!!!


5 U.S.C. 556 (d) CLEARLY STATES THAT THE TRANSCRIPTS OF TESTIMONY
(Affidavits) AND EXHIBITS (attached to affidavits), TOGETHER WILL ALL
PAPERS AND (FOIA) REQUEST’S FILED IN THE PROCEEDING CONSTITUTES THE
EXCLUSIVE RECORD FOR DECISION IN ACCORDANCE WITH 557 OF TITLE 5!!!!


What . . . “RECORD” . . . do you have now????


WITH MY NEW FOIA RELIANCE DEFENSE PACKAGE, . . . WE CAN CREATE . . .
“THE EXCLUSIVE RECORD FOR DECISION” . . . BEFORE YOU GET CONVICTED!!!!


There is . . . NO BAR ATTORNEY . . . that will ever teach you
these . . . WINNING PRE-TRIAL DISMISSAL . . . SECRETS!!!!

Why you ask????

Answer: Because if you did this prior to being charged, it is highly
possible that the IRS would have NEVER charged you in the 1st place.

2nd Answer: Because if you did this and got your case . . . DISMISSED
PRE-TRIAL, . . . THE BAR CARD ATTORNEY WILL NOT BE ABLE TO CHARGE YOU
ANY MONEY TO REPRESENT . . . HIS BEST INTERESTS WHICH IS TO MILK THE
COW AND TAKE MORE OF YOUR MONEY TO REPRESENT YOU AT TRIAL, i.e., if
your case gets dismissed pretrial, . . . THAN THERE IS NO TRIAL THAT
HE COULD CHARGE YOU ANY MONEY TO REPRESENT YOU AT, IS THERE????

IF YOUR CASE GETS DISMISSED PRE-TRIAL, THERE IS NO TRIAL RIGHT????

The attorney has a “vested” financial interest in . . . REPRESENTING
YOU AT TRIAL!!!

IF YOUR CASE GETS DISMISSED PRE-TRIAL, HOW CAN THE ATTORNEY MAKE ANY
MONEY REPRESENTING YOU AT TRIAL . . . WHEN THERE IS NOT GOING TO BE A
TRIAL????

DUH, why would any . . . BAR CARD ATTORNEY . . . shoot himself in the
foot and get your case . . . DISMISSED PRE-TRIAL . . . when he
can . . . MAKE MORE MONEY BY REPRESENTING YOU AT TRIAL????

lloyd smith at (360) 289-3429 or (360) 353-4846 or [godspastor (AT)
gmail.com] TOLD LARRY BECRAFT ABOUT 6:00 AM TO 6:30 AM EARLY ONE
MORNING ABOUT 20 TO 25 YEARS AGO HOW TO DO THIS STRATEGY JUST AFTER HE
WON HIS FIRST CASE AGAINST THE IRS GRAND JURY INDICTMENT IN SEATTLE,
WASHINGTON AND TO DATE LARRY BECRAFT HAS NEVER USED THIS STRATEGY????

Why would any . . . BAR CARD ATTORNEY . . . shoot himself in the foot
or even try to win your case at trial . . . when he or she can . . .
MAKE MORE MONEY . . . by . . . REPRESENTING YOU ON APPEAL????

The attorney has a “vested” financial interest to . . . REPRESENT YOU
ON APPEAL!!!!

Does spending more money on all the State Bar Association Attorneys
sound very . . . “APPEALING”????

Why would any . . . BAR CARD ATTORNEY . . . shoot himself in the foot
or even try to win his 1st appeal . . . when he can . . . MAKE MORE
MONEY . . . REPRESENTING YOU by appealing the denial of his appeal????

I PREFER ALL OF MY CLIENTS TO FIRE THEIR ATTORNEY AND HIRE ME TO HELP
THEM GO PRO-SE ALL THE WAY!!!!

What happens when you LOSE your case with the ATTORNEY????

Answer: YOU GO TO PRISON!!!!

What happens if you LOSE with me????

1st Answer: You won’t lose if you hire me instead of an attorney in
the first place.

2nd Answer: If you hire me to prepare the proper documents showing
that you did NOT at any time . . . WAIVE YOUR RIGHTS TO COUNSEL . . .
YOU DON’T GO TO PRISON, EVEN THOUGH YOU WERE FOUND GUILTY OF ALL
CHARGES!!!!

HOW DOES NOT GOING TO PRISON SOUND????

That process is NOT for . . . COWARDS . . . who are afraid to go to
court . . . WITHOUT AN ATTORNEY!!!!

That process will . . . NOT WORK . . . UNLESS YOU FIRE YOU ATTORNEY’S
PERIOD!!!!

For those who are too scared to go to court by themselves without an
attorney, I also have perfected a way where you can submit your own
motions even while you are represented by an attorney which
accomplishes 2 things:

1.) The case law that I have says that “failure to follow through on
leads and tips provided by the defendant, his friends and family
constitutes ‘ineffective assistance of counsel,’” which is basically
an indirect threat to the attorney which says: “I AM GOING TO SUE YOU
IF YOU LOSE MY CASE BY NOT SIGNING MY MOTIONS. Each motion has a
signature line with your name where you sign and also has a signature
line with the name and address and bar number of your attorney, you
serve his office and get your copy stamped received and then go file
copies in the court and that will force the attorney to sign your
copies or be subject to being sued if and when he LOSES YOUR CASE.

2.) The case law says that the court’s cannot ignore pleadings or
motions prepared, signed and filed by a defendant even though he or
she is represented at the same time.

Basically at a minimum, I could keep you from going to PRISON even if
you are found guilty and I have already perfected this argument and
prevented 2 clients in the CAROLINAS from being sent to PRISON even
though the jury found them guilty of several counts of willful failure
to file, several counts of income tax evasion and several counts of
conspiracy because they were business partners.

When you are taking on the 800 POUND GORILLA called . . . THE
IRS . . . I call . . . NOT GOING TO PRISON A MAJOR WIN ALL BY ITSELF,
DON’T YOU????

MY NEW FOIA RELIANCE DEFENSE PACKAGE CAN HELP YOU SET YOUR CASE UP FOR
A PRE-TRIAL DISMISSAL . . . IF YOU HIRE ME FOR THE CRIMINAL CASE!

Depending on how strong or how weak the IRS’S case is, you may have
to . . . HIRE ME . . . to write the . . . PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS TO
DISMISS!!!!

But there is NO need to discuss how much or how little that is going
to cost until after you have purchased the FOIA RELIANCE DEFENSE
PACKAGE.

Besides why discuss the price of how much or how little I would charge
to write . . . PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS TO DISMISS . . . when the IRS might
dismiss on their own after submitting my . . .NEW FOIA RELIANCE
DEFENSE PACKAGE prior to trial????

The main purpose of the FOIA RELIANCE DEFENSE PACKAGE is to force
the . . . BURDEN OF PROOF . . . back on to the plaintiff where it
belongs pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 556 (d) on the IRS!!!!

MY NEW FOIA RELIANCE DEFENSE PACKAGE . . . SHOWS THE IRS HOW MANY
HOLES THEY HAVE IN THEIR CASE . . . AND THEY DO NOT WANT THIS TO COME
OUT AT TRIAL!!!!

THIS IS FOR SERIOUS INQUIRIES ONLY PERIOD!!!!

Please do NOT send me an E-MAIL asking me how much or how little my
NEW FOIA RELIANCE DEFENSE PACKAGE COST’S, because I absolutely will
NOT tell you the answer until after you have paid my CONSULTING FEES
IN ADVANCE for each and . . . EVERY COUNT . . . and . . . EVERY
STATUTE VIOLATION PERIOD!!!!

I do NOT give BLIND PRICE QUOTES to anyone for any kind of a case
period!!!!

I WILL NOT TOLERATE . . . LOOKY LOOS . . . ANSWER SHOPPERS . . . PRICE
SHOPPERS . . . or . . . WANT SOMETHING FOR NOTHING . . .
CHEAPSKATES!!!!

Asking me how much or how little my new FOIA RELIANCE PACKAGE COST’S
is as silly as asking me how much to fix the dent on your car over the
phone WHEN I HAVEN’T SEEN THE DENT ON YOUR CAR WITH MY OWN EYES
YET!!!!

I DO NOT WRITE BOILER PLATE DOCUMENTS!!!!

EVERY FOIA RELIANCE DEFENSE PACKAGE IS DIFFERENT!!!!

EVERY FOIA RELIANCE DEFENSE PACKAGE IS CUSTOM TAILORED TO FIT YOUR
INDIVIDUAL CASE PERIOD!!!!

Every FOIA RELIANCE DEFENSE PACKAGE is custom tailored to fit your
needs and is different as I do NOT write boiler plates that will work
for the next guy who didn’t pay me, in fact, I specifically write
things in the documents to make sure that it will never work for the
next guy to prevent theft of my intellectual property.

My FOIA RELIANCE DEFENSE PACKAGE is for serious inquiries only!!!!

So if you are interested, please send me an E-MAIL asking me to send
you my CONSULTING FEES SCHEDULE and I will send it to you!!!!


Sincerely

Luis Ewing at (253) 226-3741 or (360) 353-4846 or call me on SKYPE at
[luisewing]

PS – Please go see my NEW WEB SITES: [www.luisewing (D0T) com] or
[www.ultimateusers (D0T) com]


1 HAVE SEVEN (7) E-MAIL ADDRESS at <rcwcodebuster (AT) the following
7 internet provider addresses to wit:

a.) gmail.com>
b.) yahoo.com>
c.) hotmail.com>
d.) aol.com>
e.) live.com>
f.) mail.com>
g.) comcast.net>


PLEASE DON’T FORGET TO COPY & PASTE ALL 7 OF MY E-MAIL ADDRESSES INTO
YOUR CONTACTS FOLDER IF YOU DON’T WANT MY E-MAILS TO GET ROUTED
STRAIGHT TO YOUR SPAM FOLDER BY YOUR INTERNET PROVIDER:

rcwcodebuster (AT) gmail (DOT) com, rcwcodebuster (AT) yahoo (D0T)
com, rcwcodebuster (AT) mail (D0T) com, rcwcodebuster (AT) hotmail
(DOT) com, rcwcodebuster (AT) live (D0T) com, rcwcodebuster (AT) aol
(D0T) com, rcwcodebuster (AT) comcast (DOT) net


WANT TO REACH lloyd smith? – You can contact lloyd smith at (360)
289-3429 or (360) 353-4846 or E-Mail to [godspastor (AT) gmail (DOT)
com]


WANT TO REACH KURT RIGGIN? – You can contact Kurt Riggin at : (303)
463-4437 or E-Mail to: [kurtriggin (AT) q (D0T) com]



AUTHORITY TO PRACTICE LAW . . . “WITHOUT ADMISSION” . . . by the
WASHINGTON STATE SUPREME COURT: RCW 2.48.190, RCW 26.25.010, RCW
26.26.011 (19), RCW 26.21.005 (19)(a) and RCW 26.21A.005 (21)(a),
RCW 26.27.021 (16) & RCW 26.27.041, 18 U.S.C. 1154, 18 U.S.C 1161, 25
U.S.C. 3631, RCW 2.48.170, RCW 2.48.180 (7), APR 1.1 (a), Sections
3275 & 3276 of the Territorial Code of 1881.


CAVEAT WITH REMOVAL INSTRUCTIONS HERE: This E-Mail is covered by the
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510 to 18 U.S.C.
2521; RCW 9.73.030 (1)(a) and (b). and is legally privileged and you
do NOT have my “consent” for forward this e-mail to anyone. The
information contained in this E-Mail is intended only for use of the
individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not
the intended recipient, or the employee or attorney or agent
responsible to deliver it to the Sendee, please destroy the E-Mail
after advising by reply that you erroneously received this E-Mail. The
receipt by anyone other than the designated recipient does NOT waive
the lawyer or “of-counsel client privilege,” nor will it constitute a
waiver of the “work-product doctrine.” Any information obtained in
violation of RCW 9.73.030 is inadmissible in court pursuant to RCW
9.73.050 and further, anyone who forwards this e-mail to anyone else
without my express prior “written consent” is liable for civil
monetary damages under Washington law pursuant to RCW 9.73.060 and
criminal penalties under RCW 9.73.080. The information contained in
this transmission is privileged and confidential and may be hazardous
to your preconceptions. FREE DISTRIBUTION: In accordance with Title 17
U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed free “only” to those
specific recipients listed above who have previously expressed an
interest in receiving the information for research and educational
purposes and have made a prior request for said information. If the
reader of this message is not the intended addressee, the reader is
hereby notified that any consideration, dissemination or duplication
of this communication is strictly prohibited. RCW 9.73.030 (1)(a)(b)
(C); RCW 9.73.050; RCW 9.73.060 and RCW 9.73.080 This message is
being sent to you in compliance with the current Federal legislation
for commercial e-mail (H.R.417 SECTION101Paragraph (e)(1)(A)) AND Bill
s.1618 TITLE III passed by the 105th U.S. Congress. REMOVAL
INSTRUCTIONS: This message cannot be considered SPAM as long as it
includes: 1) contact information, and 2) a way to be removed from
future e-mailings. If this e-mail communication has reached you in
error, or should you wish to be permanently removed from the mailing
list, please return to the below listed address asking me to remove
you to Luis Ewing, c/o General Delivery, (City of) Copalis Crossing,
The State of Washington [98536] or call and leave a message with your
E-Mail address and request to be removed at (253) 226-3741. Thank you!