It is proposed that a group of 30 or so FE Nastran users in a small aerospace company adopt HDF5 in order to simplify and secure all the output files in neat order and perhaps input data and avoid the issue of multiple files creations and misplacement. Maybe even use it to improve processes applied to traditional Nastran files post process.
But like any new adaption into a new software and integration with existing tools, we fear it could have pitfalls we dont understand. We also worry that we have an existing system which works (its not beautiful) but that we could in fact hinder ourselves with a new control product. Issues like, are we now dependent on programmers to set up and maintain the system, training and over complication are in our minds.
It is a case that adding HDF 5 (already in patran) when rolled out on a wide scale (30 users) has draw backs or that we start to need to have added training sessions to get everybody operating harmoniously. The problem is that the project analysis is already in progress and will go on for 18 months and mid step , we have been recommended to take up HDF5 as the baseline way of operating - it is currently believed it can only be an imporvement.
to simplify and secure all the output files in neat order and perhaps input data and avoid the issue of multiple files creations and misplacement. Maybe even use it to improve processes applied to traditional Nastran files post process.
How much pain are you experiencing currently? Have you reached certain capability limits w/ the existing approach? How much does it cost your business? Is it threatening your future? What are your peers/competitors doing?
To better understand the risks and rewards, it would be beneficial to reach out to communities or forums where professionals discuss FE analysis and Nastran usage. Platforms like LinkedIn groups, specialized forums in aerospace engineering, or Nastran user groups can provide insights from those who have undergone similar transitions.
Adopting HDF5 offers potential benefits in data management and integration, but it comes with challenges in training, complexity, and potential workflow disruption. A careful, well-planned approach with input from experienced professionals and a focus on training and gradual implementation can help mitigate these risks.
c80f0f1006