Dear all,
here's an interesting comparison between the three most widely used Bayesian modeling software pieces in Ecology, or probabilistic programming languages (PPLs), as the authors call them (although
it might be better to call them dialects of a single PPL, the BUGS language):
One take-home message from the article is this:
"Taking into account all of our simulations, Stan appears the go-to solution if one wants to learn only one between JAGS, Stan and NIMBLE programs".
But then also this:
"The greatest limitation of Stan, as underlined by many authors,
is the unfeasibility of discrete parameters, as the computation of the gradient
in this case is not allowed."
But see yourself 🙂
Best regards --- Marc