Taiwan should declare its independence
Sir John Howard
http://news.smh.com.au/taiwan-urged-to-drop-cheque-diplomacy/20080508-2ccg.html
A Taiwan middleman suspected in the disappearance of $US30 million
($A31.87 million) meant for Papua New Guinea has accused senior
officials of taking the money, local media said, amid calls to rethink
the island's chequebook diplomacy to win friends.
Suspect Wu Shi-tsai's lawyer released a document saying that an
adviser to Foreign Minister James Huang - who resigned on Tuesday -
had taken $US9.8 million ($A10.41 million), media and officials said.
The remaining $US20 million ($A21.25 million) was wired back to an
account run by the Foreign Ministry, the document said.
The scandal, which has also led to the resignations of Vice Premier
Chiou I-jen and Deputy Defence Minister Ko Chen-heng, could strengthen
President-elect Ma Ying-jeou's pledge to stop using money to buy
allies.
"This case has generated a lack of acceptance for chequebook diplomacy
among Taiwan's public, so we need to discuss it further," said Taiwan
legislator Chang Hsien-yao.
China, recognised by 170 countries including the world's most powerful
nations, has claimed self-ruled Taiwan as its territory since the end
of the Chinese civil war in 1949 and has pledged to bring the island
under its rule, by force if necessary.
Taiwan resists China by keeping its own stable of diplomatic allies,
which now number 23 mostly small, impoverished nations in Africa,
Latin America and the South Pacific.
It spends an average of T$15 billion ($A517.37 million) to T$20
billion per year on ties to those countries, Chang said.
Taipei prosecutors are probing Wu as well as the former vice premier
for the missing funds. The ex-foreign minister and ex-vice premier
have apologised but claimed innocence.
Wu and another go-between were hired in 2006 to pass the money to
Papua New Guinea, now a China ally, as development aid, the foreign
ministry says. New Guinea was a Taiwan ally for 14 days in July 1999,
until a new leadership in the impoverished South Pacific nation
scrapped the deal.
Current President Chen Shui-bian, who apologised for the flap earlier
this week, denies using chequebook diplomacy, but analysts describe
Taiwan's lavish development aid offers as lures for foreign countries
to sign with Taipei, not with Beijing.
"The negative side is that other small countries will come ask Taiwan
for money, because they know Taiwan has it," said Kweibo Huang, an
international relations instructor at National Cheng Chi University in
Taipei.
China can also buy off Taiwan's allies more easily now that it has
clues about the pricetag, analysts say.
If Ma fulfills pledges to build better ties with China, Beijing
officials will back down on their own chequebook diplomacy to fight
Taiwan, said Li Peng, assistant director of the Xiamen University
Taiwan Research Institute in China.
"Beijing wants cross-Strait relations to enter a new era and if
successful, they don't need to do anything to harm Taiwan," Li said.
------------------------
Taiwan should tell the hegemonic gooks to go fuck themselves!
Duke Lama
Your ass should declare its independence first.
Jim Walsh
(in article
<5b0a7ae0-30f7-41ea...@p39g2000prm.googlegroups.com>):
>
> China, recognised by 170 countries including the world's most powerful
> nations, has claimed self-ruled Taiwan as its territory since the end of the
> Chinese civil war in 1949 and has pledged to bring the island under its rule,
> by force if necessary.
True. But it is also true that Taiwan has never been a part of the People's
Republic of China.
The CCP's claim that it is entitled to rule any land which was once ruled by
an Emperor of China is ridiculous.
--
Love, Jim
(I often delete parts of the previous post and I often remove excessive
crossposts.)
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Sir John Howard
> On Thu, 8 May 2008 19:39:46 +0800, Sir John Howard wrote
> (in article
> <5b0a7ae0-30f7-41ea...@p39g2000prm.googlegroups.com>):
>
> >
> > China, recognised by 170 countries including the world's most powerful
> > nations, has claimed self-ruled Taiwan as its territory since the end of the
> > Chinese civil war in 1949 and has pledged to bring the island under its rule,
>
> > by force if necessary.
>
> True. But it is also true that Taiwan has never been a part of the People's
> Republic of China.
>
> The CCP's claim that it is entitled to rule any land which was once ruled by
> an Emperor of China is ridiculous.
>
> --
> Love, Jim
> (I often delete parts of the previous post and I often remove excessive
> crossposts.)
Did you say you had me killfiled, fuckhead?
fyf...@gmail.com
> On Thu, 8 May 2008 19:39:46 +0800, Sir John Howard wrote
> (in article
>
>
>
> > China, recognised by 170 countries including the world's most powerful
> > nations, has claimed self-ruled Taiwan as its territory since the end of the
> > Chinese civil war in 1949 and has pledged to bring the island under its rule,
> > by force if necessary.
>
> True. But it is also true that Taiwan has never been a part of the People's
> Republic of China.
>
> The CCP's claim that it is entitled to rule any land which was once ruled by
> an Emperor of China is ridiculous.
>
> --
> Love, Jim
> (I often delete parts of the previous post and I often remove excessive
> crossposts.)
>
> ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
What would happen if CCP were democratically elected?
Sir John Howard
> Your ass should declare its independence first.
Does that mean you'll remove your nose from it?
Sir John Howard
Raymond
Your mistake. That's his big heavy foot. Too bad your dumb ass can't
feel anything.
Sir John Howard
I see you have your head wedged well and truly up his.
rst0wxyz
> On Thu, 8 May 2008 19:39:46 +0800, Sir John Howard wrote
> (in article
>
>
>
> > China, recognised by 170 countries including the world's most powerful
> > nations, has claimed self-ruled Taiwan as its territory since the end of the
> > Chinese civil war in 1949 and has pledged to bring the island under its rule,
> > by force if necessary.
>
> True. But it is also true that Taiwan has never been a part of the People's
> Republic of China.
>
> The CCP's claim that it is entitled to rule any land which was once ruled by
> an Emperor of China is ridiculous.
National boundaries will change and continues to change with the power
of the gun.
Raymond
<sirjoh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Raymond wrote:
>> On Fri, 9 May 2008 05:00:58 -0700 (PDT), Sir John Howard
>> <sirjoh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Duke Lama wrote:
>> >> Your ass should declare its independence first.
>> >
>> >Does that mean you'll remove your nose from it?
>>
>> Your mistake. That's his big heavy foot. Too bad your dumb ass can't
>> feel anything.
>
>I see you have your head wedged well and truly up his.
Wrong again. That's your stupid head up your own fucking arsehole.
Jim Walsh
(in article
<adb87014-91a6-414e...@y22g2000prd.googlegroups.com>):
> On 5ÔÂ9ÈÕ, ÏÂÎç2ʱ46·Ö, Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSPA...@gmNOail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 8 May 2008 19:39:46 +0800, Sir John Howard wrote
>> (in article
>> <5b0a7ae0-30f7-41ea-a542-123bff368...@p39g2000prm.googlegroups.com>):
>>
>>
>>
>>> China, recognised by 170 countries including the world's most powerful
>>> nations, has claimed self-ruled Taiwan as its territory since the end of
>>> the
>>> Chinese civil war in 1949 and has pledged to bring the island under its
>>> rule,
>>> by force if necessary.
>>
>> True. But it is also true that Taiwan has never been a part of the People's
>> Republic of China.
>>
>> The CCP's claim that it is entitled to rule any land which was once ruled by
>> an Emperor of China is ridiculous.
> What would happen if CCP were democratically elected?
Are you asking my opinion?
If the CCP were democratically elected then they would be the legitimate
government of the PRC.
--
Love, Jim
(I often delete parts of the previous post and I often remove excessive
crossposts.)
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
the Fucking Boudha
85 billion US$ Hot Money from outside China
has entered Chinese financial market ,
according to Chinese central TV CCTV - 4 ..
.
On May 8, 6:39 pm, Sir John Howard <sirjohnhow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Taiwan urged to drop cheque diplomacy
>
> http://news.smh.com.au/taiwan-urged-to-drop-cheque-diplomacy/20080508...
the Fucking Boudha
Jim Walsh is gunning to rule China for and on behalf of
Taiawan .
On May 12, 3:35 pm, Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSPA...@gmNOail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 9 May 2008 16:25:36 +0800, fyfp...@gmail.com wrote
> (in article
> <adb87014-91a6-414e-9e6e-f5422d5c6...@y22g2000prd.googlegroups.com>):
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 5ÔÂ9ÈÕ, ÏÂÎç2ʱ46·Ö, Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSPA...@gmNOail.com> wrote:
> >> On Thu, 8 May 2008 19:39:46 +0800, Sir John Howard wrote
> >> (in article
> >> <5b0a7ae0-30f7-41ea-a542-123bff368...@p39g2000prm.googlegroups.com>):
>
> >>> China, recognised by 170 countries including the world's most powerful
> >>> nations, has claimed self-ruled Taiwan as its territory since the end of
> >>> the
> >>> Chinese civil war in 1949 and has pledged to bring the island under its
> >>> rule,
> >>> by force if necessary.
>
> >> True. But it is also true that Taiwan has never been a part of the People's
> >> Republic of China.
>
> >> The CCP's claim that it is entitled to rule any land which was once ruled by
> >> an Emperor of China is ridiculous.
> > What would happen if CCP were democratically elected?
>
> Are you asking my opinion?
>
> If the CCP were democratically elected then they would be the legitimate
> government of the PRC.
>
> --
> Love, Jim
> (I often delete parts of the previous post and I often remove excessive
> crossposts.)
>
> ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----http://www.newsfeeds.comThe #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
> ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Sir John Howard
> On Fri, 9 May 2008 08:29:48 -0700 (PDT), Sir John Howard
> <sirjoh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Raymond wrote:
> >> On Fri, 9 May 2008 05:00:58 -0700 (PDT), Sir John Howard
> >> <sirjoh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Duke Lama wrote:
> >> >> Your ass should declare its independence first.
> >> >
> >> >Does that mean you'll remove your nose from it?
> >>
> >> Your mistake. That's his big heavy foot. Too bad your dumb ass can't
> >> feel anything.
> >
> >I see you have your head wedged well and truly up his.
>
> Wrong again. That's your stupid head up your own fucking arsehole.
I'm not interested in hearing your perverse gook sexual fantasies.
bitter anko
> Taiwan urged to drop cheque diplomacy
>
Boy! What a contradiction you are speaking. Don't forget that it's all
you Whites who handed Taiwan to China after the WWll. The Whites like
you butchered the japs to hand Taiwan into China.
Sir John Howard
Knonichi-wa, baka-chon. So you're trying to tell me that Taiwan
belonged to Japan because they invaded during WWII or because you are
a stupid Korean who doesn't know his kimchi from a turd?
bitter anko
> bitter wanko wrote:
>
> - 引用テキストを表示 -
gooks, nips, kimchi, chinks, japs, niggers, etc., you are the only
king isn't it?
Jesus Christ the Holy Cunt Fucker
the Paiwanese , and the Ami ,, and the Zami .
On May 13, 9:36 am, Sir John Howard <sirjohnhow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> bitter wanko wrote:
> a stupid Korean who doesn't know his kimchi from a turd?- Hide quoted text -
bitter anko
>
> - 引用テキストを表示 -
Population of Chinese accounts for only some 20% of the whole
population of Taiwan. The rest of people in Taiwan are Taiwanese. The
logic of the USA "Taiwan belongs to China" is utterly a nonsense.
bitter anko
>
> - 引用テキストを表示 -
The real intention of the Whites in the USA and other Anglo-Saxon
world is simply to destroy Asia. Those Whites claim as "Taiwan is a
part of China" when the japs rule Taiwan, and when Chinese rule it,
they start to claim "Taiwan should be independent". Those Whites are
merely seeking to create a conflict in E. Asia and trying to let the
Asians kill each other for the White supremacy. Damn!
baldeagle
<veak...@gmail.com> wrote:
xxx
>
> Taiwan belongs to the Aborigenes of Taiwan ,
>
>
You are absolutely right. Bingo!
But...why are the aborigines not ruling Taiwan.
Just like the USA belongs to the Red Indian..
Why is the Chief Sitting Bull not the President
of the USA ?
The world is......a very bad place....with too many
idiots like you around
Jim Walsh
(in article
<aa9e7ee3-9218-4847...@z16g2000prn.googlegroups.com>):
> Why is the Chief Sitting Bull not the President of the USA ?
Sitting Bull was not a chief. The key reason is that he is not President of
the USA is that he has been dead for more than100 years.
--
Love, Jim
(I often delete parts of the previous post and I often remove excessive
crossposts.)
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
Jim Walsh
(in article
<e41f900e-0558-4c99...@x19g2000prg.googlegroups.com>):
> opulation of Chinese accounts for only some 20% of the whole population of
> Taiwan. The rest of people in Taiwan are Taiwanese. The logic of the USA
> "Taiwan belongs to China" is utterly a nonsense.
If the USA believed that Taiwan belonged to China, it would be a stupid and
wrong belief.
The USA does not so believe.
Jim Walsh
(in article
<7c543603-ac14-4ace...@j33g2000pri.googlegroups.com>):
>
> The real intention of the Whites in the USA and other Anglo-Saxon world is
> simply to destroy Asia.
There are no "Whites".
bitter anko
> On Wed, 14 May 2008 14:08:13 +0800, bitter anko wrote
> (in article
>
>
>
> > The real intention of the Whites in the USA and other Anglo-Saxon world is
> > simply to destroy Asia.
>
> There are no "Whites".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_people
White people (also known as whites or collectively as the white race)
have been defined as a racial group of human beings with light
pigmentation of their skin or having light-coloured skin, especially
of European ancestry.
Jim Walsh
(in article
<2262b526-4824-4c3f...@p39g2000prm.googlegroups.com>):
There are no racial groups. The human species is not divided into races.
baldeagle
> On Wed, 14 May 2008 14:10:56 +0800, baldeagle wrote
> (in article
>
> > Why is the Chief Sitting Bull not the President of the USA ?
>
> Sitting Bull was not a chief. The key reason is that he is not President of
> the USA is that he has been dead for more than100 years.
>
bull.
You are a moron....who jump into a discussion
without knowing the details.
An idiot say... the native of Taiwan is the owner
of Taiwan and should rule Taiwan.
My rebuttal....if native is the owner of a country, then
the Red Indian own the USA...then why the Indian Chief
is not the president of the USA.
Jim Walsh
(in article
<0cac85da-818a-4a21...@y18g2000pre.googlegroups.com>):
> On May 14, 4:17 pm, Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSPA...@gmNOail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, 14 May 2008 14:10:56 +0800, baldeagle wrote
>> (in article
>> <aa9e7ee3-9218-4847-97bb-c04ba2cfe...@z16g2000prn.googlegroups.com>):
>>
>>> Why is the Chief Sitting Bull not the President of the USA ?
>>
>> Sitting Bull was not a chief. The key reason is that he is not President of
>> the USA is that he has been dead for more than100 years.
>>
> Some Red Indians refer to their chief and chief sitting bull.
Sitting Bull was a holy man (aka a "medicine man").
Sitting Bull (Sioux: Tatanka Iyotake, Tatanka Iyotanka or Ta-Tanka I-Yotank,
also nicknamed Slon-he or "Slow"; ca. 1831 December 15, 1890) was a
Hunkpapa Lakota Sioux holy man,
wikipedia.
Jim Walsh
(in article
<0cac85da-818a-4a21...@y18g2000pre.googlegroups.com>):
> then why the Indian Chief is not the president of the USA.
Well, members of various tribes have been elected to high office. Not yet the
Presidency, but that could happen.
Jesus Christ the Holy Cunt Fucker
Taiwan was Austronesian territory ,.
ball Eagle , do you think ASEAN belong to the Chinese ?
will Chinese rule ASEAN ?
natives of ASEAN will be slaves to the Chinese ?
according to your logics in looking at the USA .
Jesus Christ the Holy Cunt Fucker
White is a beautiful skin colour for women .
On May 14, 3:17 pm, Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSPA...@gmNOail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 14 May 2008 14:08:13 +0800, bitter anko wrote
> (in article
> <7c543603-ac14-4ace-86dd-e941d87ec...@j33g2000pri.googlegroups.com>):
>
>
>
> > The real intention of the Whites in the USA and other Anglo-Saxon world is
> > simply to destroy Asia.
>
> There are no "Whites".
>
> --
> Love, Jim
> (I often delete parts of the previous post and I often remove excessive
> crossposts.)
>
> ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----http://www.newsfeeds.comThe #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
Jesus Christ the Holy Cunt Fucker
Hainan for Chinese subs which
will help Chinese in ASEAN to take over ASEAN .
On May 14, 3:17 pm, Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSPA...@gmNOail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 14 May 2008 13:57:41 +0800, bitter anko wrote
> (in article
> <e41f900e-0558-4c99-99a3-eb638245a...@x19g2000prg.googlegroups.com>):
>
> > opulation of Chinese accounts for only some 20% of the whole population of
> > Taiwan. The rest of people in Taiwan are Taiwanese. The logic of the USA
> > "Taiwan belongs to China" is utterly a nonsense.
>
> If the USA believed that Taiwan belonged to China, it would be a stupid and
> wrong belief.
>
> The USA does not so believe.
>
> --
> Love, Jim
> (I often delete parts of the previous post and I often remove excessive
> crossposts.)
>
> ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----http://www.newsfeeds.comThe #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
Jesus Christ the Holy Cunt Fucker
did g Holy Sitting Bull fuck holy female cows ?
On May 15, 1:32 pm, Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSPA...@gmNOail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 14 May 2008 23:01:19 +0800, baldeagle wrote
> (in article
> <0cac85da-818a-4a21-8144-22a64c3a2...@y18g2000pre.googlegroups.com>):
>
> > On May 14, 4:17 pm, Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSPA...@gmNOail.com> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 14 May 2008 14:10:56 +0800, baldeagle wrote
> >> (in article
> >> <aa9e7ee3-9218-4847-97bb-c04ba2cfe...@z16g2000prn.googlegroups.com>):
>
> >>> Why is the Chief Sitting Bull not the President of the USA ?
>
> >> Sitting Bull was not a chief. The key reason is that he is not President of
> >> the USA is that he has been dead for more than100 years.
>
> > Some Red Indians refer to their chief and chief sitting bull.
>
> Sitting Bull was a holy man (aka a "medicine man").
>
> Sitting Bull (Sioux: Tatanka Iyotake, Tatanka Iyotanka or Ta-Tanka I-Yotank,
> also nicknamed Slon-he or "Slow"; ca. 1831 December 15, 1890) was a
> Hunkpapa Lakota Sioux holy man,
>
> wikipedia.
>
> --
> Love, Jim
> (I often delete parts of the previous post and I often remove excessive
> crossposts.)
>
> ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----http://www.newsfeeds.comThe #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
Sitting Bull - verkregen door Koninklijke Familie
> On Wed, 14 May 2008 23:01:19 +0800, baldeagle wrote
> (in article
>
> > On May 14, 4:17 pm, Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSPA...@gmNOail.com> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 14 May 2008 14:10:56 +0800, baldeagle wrote
> >> (in article
> >> <aa9e7ee3-9218-4847-97bb-c04ba2cfe...@z16g2000prn.googlegroups.com>):
>
>
> >>SittingBullwas not a chief. The key reason is that he is not President of
> >> the USA is that he has been dead for more than100 years.
>
> > Some Red Indians refer to their chief and chiefsittingbull.
>
>
> SittingBull(Sioux: Tatanka Iyotake, Tatanka Iyotanka or Ta-Tanka I-Yotank,
> also nicknamed Slon-he or "Slow"; ca. 1831 December 15, 1890) was a
> Hunkpapa Lakota Sioux holy man,
>
> wikipedia.
>
> --
> Love, Jim
> (I often delete parts of the previous post and I often remove excessive
> crossposts.)
>
> ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
>>
>>
>> we do our best --- nous faisons notre meilleure -- www.tholen.smartmap.nl -- streetregister--rozestraat
>> google group opwakkeren --- http://groups.google.nl/group/opwakkeren
>>
>>
the Fucking Boudha
On May 15, 2:31 pm, Sitting Bull - verkregen door Koninklijke Familie
<bartelds...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 15 mei, 08:32, Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSPA...@gmNOail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Wed, 14 May 2008 23:01:19 +0800, baldeagle wrote
> > (in article
> > <0cac85da-818a-4a21-8144-22a64c3a2...@y18g2000pre.googlegroups.com>):
>
> > > On May 14, 4:17 pm, Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSPA...@gmNOail.com> wrote:
> > >> On Wed, 14 May 2008 14:10:56 +0800, baldeagle wrote
> > >> (in article
> > >> <aa9e7ee3-9218-4847-97bb-c04ba2cfe...@z16g2000prn.googlegroups.com>):
>
> > >>> Why is the ChiefSittingBullnot the President of the USA ?
>
> > >>SittingBullwas not a chief. The key reason is that he is not President of
> > >> the USA is that he has been dead for more than100 years.
>
> > > Some Red Indians refer to their chief and chiefsittingbull.
>
> > SittingBullwas a holy man (aka a "medicine man").
>
> > SittingBull(Sioux: Tatanka Iyotake, Tatanka Iyotanka or Ta-Tanka I-Yotank,
> > also nicknamed Slon-he or "Slow"; ca. 1831 December 15, 1890) was a
> > Hunkpapa Lakota Sioux holy man,
>
> > wikipedia.
>
> > --
> > Love, Jim
> > (I often delete parts of the previous post and I often remove excessive
> > crossposts.)
>
> > ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----http://www.newsfeeds.comThe#1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
> > ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
>
> >> we do our best --- nous faisons notre meilleure -- www.tholen.smartmap.nl -- streetregister--rozestraat
> >> google group opwakkeren --- http://groups.google.nl/group/opwakkeren- Hide quoted text -
baldeagle
.
>
> > Some Red Indians refer to their chief and chief sitting bull.
>
> Sitting Bull was a holy man (aka a "medicine man").
>
> Sitting Bull (Sioux: Tatanka Iyotake, Tatanka Iyotanka or Ta-Tanka I-Yotank,
> also nicknamed Slon-he or "Slow"; ca. 1831 December 15, 1890) was a
> Hunkpapa Lakota Sioux holy man,
>
For some one who claim to be American, you don't know
Red Indian lores.
A real disgrace.
baldeagle
> On Wed, 14 May 2008 23:01:19 +0800, baldeagle wrote
> (in article
>
> > then why the Indian Chief is not the president of the USA.
>
> Well, members of various tribes have been elected to high office. Not yet the
> Presidency, but that could happen.
>
You talk cock again.
The USA do not belong to Red Indian...it belong to
the White man NOW.
White man killed Red Indian and took over their land
and country.
White man will NEVER given back the country to
the Red Indian and allow the chief sitting bull to
take over the White House.
Mohammed the Holy Fucker
just like White rules the red native Indians in USA .
and White rules the black skin native Australians .
Sir John Howard
> On 5 $B7n (B14 $BF| (B, $B8a8e (B12:45, Jesus Christ the Holy Cunt Fucker
> <veak...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Taiwan belongs to the Aborigenes of Taiwan ,
> >
> > the Paiwanese , and the Ami ,, and the Zami .
> >
> > On May 13, 9:36 am, Sir John Howard <sirjohnhow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > bitter wanko wrote:
> >
> > - $B0zMQ%F%-%9%H$rI=<( (B -
>
> Population of Chinese accounts for only some 20% of the whole
> population of Taiwan. The rest of people in Taiwan are Taiwanese. The
> logic of the USA "Taiwan belongs to China" is utterly a nonsense.
There are no Japs in Taiwan, unko Anko, so you have no claim to it.
Jim Walsh
(in article
<1650d517-b324-4425...@y18g2000pre.googlegroups.com>):
>
> For some one who claim to be American, you don't know Red Indian lores.
>
> A real disgrace.
LOL. You are funny.
Jim Walsh
(in article
<8b112a1c-6c0f-43d6...@u12g2000prd.googlegroups.com>):
> White man will NEVER given back the country to the Red Indian and allow the
> chief sitting bull to take over the White House.
1. There are no races. There words "white man" have no biological
significance.
2. Native Americans are more free than the Burmese and the Chinese.
3. Maybe a Native American will be elected President, maybe not. Native
Americans have been elected to hight office.
baldeagle
wrote:
> so Chinese should rule dark skin native Malays in Malaysia , ?
> just like White rules the red native Indians in USA .
> and White rules the black skin native Australians .
You talk cock.
The Malay killed the natives (Sakai) of Malaya, took over
their land, their wealth and their country...and renamed it
Malaysia.
Malay should give the country back to the Sakai.
baldeagle
> On Fri, 16 May 2008 09:28:46 +0800, baldeagle wrote
> (in article
>
> > White man will NEVER given back the country to the Red Indian and allow the
> > chief sitting bull to take over the White House.
>
> 1. There are no races. There words "white man" have no biological
> significance.
Don't digress, you moron.
White man is not one single race. It is the people from Europe.
The people from Europe (White man) almost wiped out the
Red Indian, stole their land and country.
baldeagle
> On Fri, 16 May 2008 09:23:42 +0800, baldeagle wrote
> (in article
>
>
>
> > For some one who claim to be American, you don't know Red Indian lores.
>
> > A real disgrace.
>
> LOL. You are funny.
You are a disgrace.
Jim Walsh
(in article
<a414fac8-6e72-4e09...@p39g2000prm.googlegroups.com>):
> White man is not one single race. It is the people from Europe. The people
> from Europe (White man) almost wiped out the Red Indian, stole their land and
> country.
There are no races at all. There are no "white men".
The tragedy of the original people is well known.
baldeagle
> On Sat, 17 May 2008 06:25:51 +0800, baldeagle wrote
>
>
>
>
Yah...White man is just an illusion.
ha ha ha ha
bitter anko
> On Wed, 14 May 2008 21:35:49 +0800, bitter anko wrote
> (in article
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 5月14日, 午後5:17, Jim Walsh
> > <jimNOwalsSPA...@gmNOail.com> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 14 May 2008 14:08:13 +0800, bitter anko wrote
> >> (in article
> >> <7c543603-ac14-4ace-86dd-e941d87ec...@j33g2000pri.googlegroups.com>):
>
> >>> The real intention of the Whites in the USA and other Anglo-Saxon world is
> >>> simply to destroy Asia.
>
> >> There are no "Whites".
> > White people
> >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_people
> > White people (also known as whites or collectively as the white race)
> > have been defined as a racial group of human beings with light
> > pigmentation of their skin or having light-coloured skin, especially
> > of European ancestry.
>
> There are no racial groups. The human species is not divided into races.
You have to be classified into a specific race or a specific color you
belong to right after you were born in you dumb racist land. Blame
your own country.
http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~familytrails/b/MRIN_B000003/HarryChaffinsJr_birth.jpg
http://www.gaic.info/images/SeagovilleBirthCert71744.jpg
koki
> Duke Lama wrote:
> > Your ass should declare its independence first.
>
> Does that mean you'll remove your nose from it?
haha...well saying!
Taiwan is a part of china!
Jim Walsh
(in article
<22556129-c7dd-4a52...@u36g2000prf.googlegroups.com>):
> On 5月14日, 午後10:58, Jim Walsh
> <jimNOwalsSPA...@gmNOail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, 14 May 2008 21:35:49 +0800, bitter anko wrote
>> (in article
>> <2262b526-4824-4c3f-bd3f-c37909175...@p39g2000prm.googlegroups.com>):
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 5月14日, 午後5:17, Jim Walsh
>>> <jimNOwalsSPA...@gmNOail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 14 May 2008 14:08:13 +0800, bitter anko wrote
>>>> (in article
>>>> <7c543603-ac14-4ace-86dd-e941d87ec...@j33g2000pri.googlegroups.com>):
>>
>>>>> The real intention of the Whites in the USA and other Anglo-Saxon world
>>>>> is
>>>>> simply to destroy Asia.
>>
>>>> There are no "Whites".
>>> White people
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_people
>>> White people (also known as whites or collectively as the white race)
>>> have been defined as a racial group of human beings with light
>>> pigmentation of their skin or having light-coloured skin, especially
>>> of European ancestry.
>>
>> There are no racial groups. The human species is not divided into races.
>
> You have to be classified into a specific race or a specific color you
> belong to right after you were born in you dumb racist land.....
Nonsense. I don't have any race. I can't have any race because human races do
not exist.
Jesus Christ the Holy Cunt Fucker
achtung
On May 20, 3:38 pm, Jesus Christ the Holy Cunt Fucker
> > Malay should give the country back to the Sakai.- Hide quoted text -
baldeagle
Negri Sakai has a nice ring to it.
> > should Malaysia be called Sakai-land or China - land ?
>
achtung
baldeagle
Mohammed the Holy Fucker
Vote out Brendan Nelson
baldeagle
wrote:
xxx
>
> bald Eagle ,are you saying the Malays are inferior race ?
>
It depends....Compared with babi, Malay is better...
compared with dog, Malay is inferior.
baldeagle
>
> Taiwan should liberate .....
>
CKS dreamt of liberating China from the communist.
Now communism is dead in China....His dream
has now come true.
If you are dreaming about Taiwan, declaring
independence.....be a sovereign nation,... recognised
by the UN and all the countries around the world....
it is not bed time yet. You must wait!
Jesus Christ the Holy Cunt Fucker
with dogs ?
baldeagle
<veak...@gmail.com> wrote:
> bald Eagle , why are you Chinese comapring the Malay people
> with dogs ?
Because Malay is inferior to dog...better
than pig.
Dog and pig are the best loved animal
by Chinese. It is an honour to be compared
with dog and pig.
Mohammed the Holy Fucker
why are you Chinese referring to the Malays people as dogs ?
baldeagle
wrote:
> Bald Eagle, are you Chinese the superior people ?
>
No the Chinese are not superior people....Malay
are inferior people...they are stupid, lazy and
corrupt.
> why are you Chinese referring to the Malays people as dogs ?
The Chinese love pigs and dogs...saying
Malay are pigs and dogs...is like saying
they love the Malay.
Sir John Howard
Since when?
Sir John Howard
> >
> > - $B0zMQ%F%-%9%H$rI=<( (B -
>
> part of China" when the japs rule Taiwan, and when Chinese rule it,
> they start to claim "Taiwan should be independent". Those Whites are
> merely seeking to create a conflict in E. Asia and trying to let the
> Asians kill each other for the White supremacy. Damn!
Japan did a good job of destroying Asia over 60 years ago, baka-chon.
bitter anko
>
> > > - 引用テキストを表示 -
>
> > The real intention of the Whites in the USA and other Anglo-Saxon
> > world is simply to destroy Asia. Those Whites claim as "Taiwan is a
> > part of China" when the japs rule Taiwan, and when Chinese rule it,
> > they start to claim "Taiwan should be independent". Those Whites are
> > merely seeking to create a conflict in E. Asia and trying to let the
> > Asians kill each other for the White supremacy. Damn!
>
>
> - 引用テキストを表示 -
I support the independence of Taiwan because I'm a jap and I don't
want strong China with Taiwan trying to nuke us, but if I were
Taiwanese, I would agree with the One China concept, the idea of
Taiwan as a part of China because China is the super power.
Simply the Whites don't want the strong China as well, that's why you
damn it.
Duke Lama
Sir John Howard wrote:
> koki wrote:
> > On May 9, 8:00嚙緘m, Sir John Howard <sirjohnhow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Duke Lama wrote:
> > > > Your ass should declare its independence first.
> > >
> > > Does that mean you'll remove your nose from it?
> >
> > haha...well saying!
> > Taiwan is a part of china!
>
> Since when?
Since earlier than California became part of USA and scotland part of UK.
baldeagle
I support one China policy, because I am an American,
I support the unification of Taiwan with China, because I
am also a Chinese, and
I like to see the unification to take place soon, because
I am also a Singaporean.
Sitting Bull - verkregen door Koninklijke Familie
> On Wed, 14 May 2008 14:10:56 +0800, baldeagle wrote
> (in article
> <aa9e7ee3-9218-4847-97bb-c04ba2cfe...@z16g2000prn.googlegroups.com>):
>
> > Why is the Chief Sitting Bull not the President of the USA ?
>
> Sitting Bull was not a chief. The key reason is that he is not President of
> the USA is that he has been dead for more than100 years.
>
> --
> Love, Jim
> (I often delete parts of the previous post and I often remove excessive
> crossposts.)
>
> ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
>
>
>
>
Jim Walsh
(in article
<4db2d5ee-6f11-4957...@z16g2000prn.googlegroups.com>):
>
> No the Chinese are not superior people....Malay are inferior people..
No "people" are superior or inferior.
You are a bigot.
--
Love, Jim
(I often delete parts of the previous post and I often remove excessive
crossposts.)
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
Jim Walsh
(in article <4836F0A4...@mama.com>):
>
>
> Sir John Howard wrote:
>
>> koki wrote:
>>> On May 9, 8:00ï¿œpm, Sir John Howard <sirjohnhow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Duke Lama wrote:
>>>>> Your ass should declare its independence first.
>>>>
>>>> Does that mean you'll remove your nose from it?
>>>
>>> haha...well saying!
>>> Taiwan is a part of china!
>>
>> Since when?
>
> Since earlier than California became part of USA and scotland part of UK.
>
No. The PRC did not exist when California became part of the USA.
baldeagle
> On Fri, 23 May 2008 19:12:00 +0800, baldeagle wrote
> (in article
>
>
>
> > No the Chinese are not superior people....Malay are inferior people..
>
> No "people" are superior or inferior.
>
Just back from outer space or on a drug induced
trip...
In the USA, the Whites are superior...and the
blacks are inferior...
In Malaysia, the Bumi are inferior ,....and the
Indians are inferior.
Duke Lama
Jim Walsh wrote:
> On Sat, 24 May 2008 00:28:20 +0800, Duke Lama wrote
> (in article <4836F0A4...@mama.com>):
>
> >
> >
> > Sir John Howard wrote:
> >
> >> koki wrote:
> >>> On May 9, 8:00嚙緘m, Sir John Howard <sirjohnhow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> Duke Lama wrote:
> >>>>> Your ass should declare its independence first.
> >>>>
> >>>> Does that mean you'll remove your nose from it?
> >>>
> >>> haha...well saying!
> >>> Taiwan is a part of china!
> >>
> >> Since when?
> >
> > Since earlier than California became part of USA and scotland part of UK.
> >
>
> No. The PRC did not exist when California became part of the USA.
>
You are right, the whole China does not belong to PRC. California belongs to
Mexico.There is no USA at all over the territory which belongs to the Red Indians.
Sir John Howard
> Sir John Howard wrote:
>
> > koki wrote:
> > > > Duke Lama wrote:
> > > > > Your ass should declare its independence first.
> > > >
> > > > Does that mean you'll remove your nose from it?
> > >
> > > haha...well saying!
> > > Taiwan is a part of china!
> >
> > Since when?
>
> Since earlier than California became part of USA and scotland part of UK.
Which is utter nonsense.
Mohammed the Holy Fucker
Chinese want to take Malaysia .
baldeagle
wrote:
> bald Eagel, you Chinese just hate the Malay people because you
> Chinese want to take Malaysia .
>
No, you are wrong....I love Malay people...I have
many Malay girl friends...
But I hate Malay terrorists, Malay suicide bombers,
Malay mata mata. Why do Malay want to be terrorists,
suicide bombers...and mata mata.
the Fucking Boudha
you said in your previous post that the Chinese is a supeior race ,
and
you gave the reason why
Malaysia did not fit to be a part of China because the Malays
were infeior people ,
and
you said the Malays and the natives of SE ASIA were inferior
people ,
just like the natives of USA.
now you say you love the Malays , AFTER
mohamed the fucker
accused you bald Eagle the Chinese of hating the Malay people.
bald Eagle ,, you are a Chinese , and you are a lying Chinese
race .
you responded according to the accusations against your Chinese
race in ASEAN .
your Chinese race is also lying all the time in malaysia.
baldeagle
> bald eagle , you Chinese are lying all the time
Very rude,.... kurang ajah.....to call burong botak
lying Chinese.... Only Indian tell lies.
You failed....F-
Jesus Christ the Holy Cunt Fucker
just like Jesus Christ was a Jewish liar .
but Jesus Christ has never referred to the Malay people as
dogs ,
while you Chinese bald Eagle classified the Malay people as
inferior to dogs .
baldeagle
<veak...@gmail.com> wrote:
> just like Jesus Christ was a Jewish liar .
You are right...A* for you.
Yes, Jesus Christ was a liar...he lied about
God...and he lied about being the son of
God...he was the son of a carpenter.
Prophet Mohamed was also a big liar..
He lied that Allah talked to him....Allah
need not talk ...He could send email to
all his followers.
Surely Allah knew how to send email...so that
everything is in print...and everyone can
read his message....no need to go through
Mohamed who cannot read and write.
Jesus Christ the Holy Cunt Fucker
Jesus Christ loved prostitute 's cunt .
as for Mohammed , Mohammed did not pretend to be a non-
fucker .