Re: hookers in china and cheap China 5-star hotels! - rec.travel.asia - read this!
RichAsianKid
<irahumperdin...@hotmail.com>" <markdemer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 21, 6:13 pm, RichAsianKid <richasian...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jan 21, 8:53 pm, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD
>
> > <irahumperdin...@hotmail.com>" <markdemer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Jan 21, 5:11 pm, RichAsianKid <richasian...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Jan 21, 3:06 am, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD
>
> > > > <irahumperdin...@hotmail.com>" <markdemer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > On Jan 20, 10:53 pm,RichAsianKid<richasian...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Jan 21, 12:59 am, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD
>
> > > > > > <irahumperdin...@hotmail.com>" <markdemer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >RichAsianKid: Chinese are even looked down upon in what is
> > > > > > > > now China's own territory: Hong Kong. In 2007 it was almost a
> > > > > > > > healthcare crisis and it made international news: pregnant Chinese
> > > > > > > > women traipsing across the border to anchor their babies and then
> > > > > > > > conveniently forgetting to submit required payment! Most Hong Kong'ers
> > > > > > > > are ethnically Han Chinese themselves.
>
> > > > > > > mainland chinese remind hong kongers about their embarrassing family
> > > > > > > tree. sort of like how a city slicker does not like it when his
> > > > > > > country bumpkin cousin visits and embarrasses the slicker by reminding
> > > > > > > him that he came from a family of spitting monkeys.
>
> > > > > > "Keep friends close but enemies closer"
>
> > > > > of all cultures, only 2 like to deny they evolved from apes:
> > > > > 1) japanese
> > > > > 2) chinese
> > > > > Americans (except for nutso fundamentalists) believe in evolution and
> > > > > teach it in schools. CCP does not permit the teaching of evolution
> > > > > in schools. That's because chinese cannot accept they are
> > > > > fundamentally just a money who lost his fur and shrunk his penis.
>
> > > > Stripped of the burden of political correctness, evolution and social
> > > > darwinism seem way more easily accepted by mainland Chinese or just
> > > > about any NorthEast Asians compared to starry-eyed Americans - in fact
> > > > Americans are, on this issue, fundamentalist egalitarians. There
> > > > cannot be any differences in intelligence between blacks and whites,
> > > > and if you even begin to enunciate this fact then you're obviously a
> > > > (guess what, tata!) racist and should be banished to the 10th circle
> > > > of hell etc etc. Whatever you think of the third world mainland
> > > > Chinese they know damn well that if you have a large pigmented
> > > > underclass life just won't be the same. You just won't have the same
> > > > 'harmonious society'. The Japanese and the Koreans also think the
> > > > same. The motto? Prevention is the best cure.
>
> > > doesn't work because china has a large dark skin population, including
> > > darkie han, fukinese (darkies), and mongoose. the only light skin
> > > chinese are the muslims, but the muslims are being bullied by the ccp.
>
> > But will China do any better if it imports a huge black/African
> > population? Seriously? And at what cost?
>
> yes, the blacks will enrich chinas in too many ways to mention.
> first, they will organize, speak out, shake up, and bring modern
> ideas and democracy to china. second, a few leaders will emerge, such
> as MLK and Obama, who will be great political leaders. (have you ever
> heard the chinese politburo speakers give a speech? mind numbingly
> boring...) Third, the blacks will teach the chinese how to play
> basketball so that china can actually become competitive in the
> olympics. Fourth, strong black women, such as opera winfry, will
> emerge to energize and organize chinese women. Fifth, blacks will
> shake up chinese music, develop some chinese rap songs so that chinese
> music can become "cool". All in all, blacks will enrich china just
> like blacks have greatly enriched america.
Wow, doctor, not the first time but I see you're really a great
defender for the black people aren't you? "Blacks will enrich China
just as like blacks have greatly enriched America." Bwahahaha!! That
shows that you're not (that) Asian - at least no Asian that I know of
would say such a thing - and most likely not an white either - at
least not on libertarian internet. Let me post this for everyone to
see:
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2005/03/25/1111692629223.html?from=top
"How come the United States selects a female chimpanzee as Secretary
of State?"
"This black woman thinks rather a lot of herself."
"She's so ugly she's losing face. Even a dog would be put off its
dinner while she's being fed."
Bwahahahahaa!!!!
If America elects Obama, it makes itself the laughing stock of the
world. America may be too naive to understand that......
Sorry, whatever you think of the CCP, China just doesn't need a crime
wave. Here's a nice PDF reference:
http://amren.com/colorofcrime/color.pdf
And.....get this. Look at Japan. In another article, "Japan therefore
has first-rate opera without Italians, jazz without blacks, heavy
metal without Brits and some of the best "Western" science and
technology without Westerners. What Japan does not have is "honor
killings," voodoo, MS-13, bilingualism or racial tension, and it will
never have these things if it keeps to its current no-immigration
policy."
You can easily absorb influences from afar. You just don't necessarily
want to shack up with them that's all.
Blacks of course would love to migrate and even parasitically hang
onto even a third world country like China. By many measures Africa is
doing even worse off than China. The problem is that the Chinese don't
want to have them on their own territory. I must say that I don't
necessarily blame them based on America's failed experiment.
Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD <irahumperdinkMD@hotmail.com>
china has NO SOUL, NO RAP, NO MUSIC, NO BASKETBALL, and NO FUN. china
would be a much happier, enjoyable, open, honest, and democratic
society with 25% black population.
Look at rich japan. They have 3rd rate immitation jazz, 3rd rate
baseball, ridiculous basketball, and unoriginal copycat science.
japan can never be a great country like America because the japanese
marry each other. Inbreeding blocks evolution.
Every biologist knows that genes that mix with a larger genetic pool
is superior.
achtung
On Jan 23, 2:53 pm, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD
> is superior.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD <irahumperdinkMD@hotmail.com>
actung, you must be pure, inbred stock. are your parents cousins?
RichAsianKid
<irahumperdin...@hotmail.com>" <markdemer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 22, 3:59 pm,RichAsianKid<richasian...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jan 21, 9:52 pm, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD
>
> > <irahumperdin...@hotmail.com>" <markdemer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Jan 21, 8:53 pm, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD
>
> > > > <irahumperdin...@hotmail.com>" <markdemer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
China will pass. Blacks won't contribute to its 'harmonious society'
mandate. China will be riddled with crime, strife, and racial discord
if it recklessly import 25% blacks. Are you kidding?
Besides there is no strong evidence that mixed race people are
intermediate, and this hybrid vigor myth is precisely that - a myth.
Mixed race children experience a whole slew of problems psychological
problems no found in their monoracial counterparts.
(1) First study (with comments):
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.african.american/msg/eda5658162ac0e41?
(2) Another study:
http://i14.tinypic.com/6kpn2hj.jpg
Reference: Udry JR, Li RM, Hendrickson-Smith J: Health and behavior
risks of adolescents with mixed-race identity. Am J Public Health
2003, 93:1865-1870.
Total sample size: 83,135 + 18,924, based on the National Longitudinal
Study of Adolescent Health from grades 7 through 12 during 1994-1995.
Sample size is therefore HUGE.
Now, look at the results. Can someone tell me why anyone would like to
mix with a black? Look at the GPA scores of the child, especially
between Asian and black. The child's achievements in most cases become
becomes virtually black. Likewise for other groups. Just look at it
yourself if you don't believe me. Here, I type it out for you:
Percentage of children reaching the 75th percentile (if distribution
is average or 'normal' it should be 25%) -- i.e. higher the better:
"Pure"
White - 32.27 Black - 15.45 American Indian - 14.97 Asian 43.16
"Mixed"
White/black 24.19
White/American Indian 27.10
White/Asian 37.58
Black/American Indian 18.79
Black/Asian 18.57
Asian/American Indian 21.82
The above GPAs (grade point average) numbers refer not to
the absolute GPAs themselves but to the percentage of individuals in
the 75th percentile of the entire sample. Thus 25% will be on par as
you would expect 25% of the population to exceed the 75th percentile.
In the case of Asians, 43.16% exceed the 75th percentile. In the case
of Blacks - only 15.45% of them do. Mix the two, and you only have
18.57%, that is, the group performance of an Asian/black mix is CLOSER
to that of black than to the middle ground between the two!!
Also, mixed race children are associated with a number of side effects
from the study. Found this table.
http://i15.tinypic.com/716vjuo.jpg
Numbers quoted are odds ratios (OR), see the table for details for the
OR calculation, with (*) indicating statistical significance at p<0.05
You can see that across the board most of the ratios are > 1,
indicating that mixed race teens really do experience a lot more
problems such as poor health, waking up tired, being a smoker,
drinker, having sleep problems, depression etc etc compared to their
monoracial counterparts.
Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD <irahumperdinkMD@hotmail.com>
your statistics are bogus due to tiny sample size. you don't need to
do studies to see the impact, boy. Just compare mixed-race versus
pure race countries:
1) compare "pure english ladies" to mixed race ladies in southern
calif. who is prettier?
2) compare "pure white southern americans" to "mixed ethnics" in new
york. who has more brith defects and who has higher IQ scores?
if you like your chinese so pure, why don't you go mate with your
sister?
RichAsianKid
Are you making fun of yourself here?
Total sample size: 83,135 + 18,924, based on the National Longitudinal
Study of Adolescent Health from grades 7 through 12 during
1994-1995 ... and yet it makes it on CNN when a drug trial of a few
hundred people shows benefit....or is your claim that mixed race
people are 'better' (however you define it) now somehow unfalsifiable?
And you should also ask these questions since you raised them:
(1) Compare pure Swedish blondes to mulatto women. "Who is prettier"
to quote your verbatim?
(2) Compare pure white Icelandics (or pure Japanese) to the mixed race
negroes in South Africa. Which group earns higher IQ scores?
Last, abandon this perception of 'purity' - it is a relative term.
Outsiders see China as 'pure' but there are many tribes and genetic
variations within it etc.
http://www.nature.com/ejhg/journal/vaop/ncurrent/abs/5201998a.html
China only appears 'pure' compared to miscegenated US or South America
where even dogs are labelled as racist.
Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD <irahumperdinkMD@hotmail.com>
> > > White/black 24.19
> > > White/American Indian 27.10
> > > White/Asian 37.58
> > > Black/American Indian 18.79
> > > Black/Asian 18.57
> > > Asian/American Indian 21.82
you need to control for socio-economic factors. it's well known that
test scores of upper middle class suburban blacks are higher than that
of whites and asians.
are you saying you're smarter than snoop dogg and fiddy cents? if
you're so smart, why do they live in beverley hills mansions and pork
a different blonde every night while you are holed up m'bating in a
dorm room?
RichAsianKid
<irahumperdin...@hotmail.com>" <markdemer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > White/black 24.19
> > > > White/American Indian 27.10
> > > > White/Asian 37.58
> > > > Black/American Indian 18.79
> > > > Black/Asian 18.57
> > > > Asian/American Indian 21.82
>
> you need to control for socio-economic factors. it's well known that
> test scores of upper middle class suburban blacks are higher than that
> of whites and asians.
>
Wrong answer again. Re-read the original link -- third column
http://i14.tinypic.com/6kpn2hj.jpg
Controlling for a college-educated parent, the percentages of students
who score over the 75th percentile are (i.e. higher number the better,
baseline should be 25%):
"Pure" race adolescents:
Asian 60.8%
White - 41.3%
Black 35.39%
Mixed race adolescents:
White/Asian 52.36%
White/Black 39.46%
Black/Asian 35.81%
More importantly, from the SAT, children from black households that
make over $100,000 score LOWER than children from white households
that make less than $10,000. Amazing isn't it?
> are you saying you're smarter than snoop dogg and fiddy cents? if
> you're so smart, why do they live in beverley hills mansions and pork
> a different blonde every night while you are holed up m'bating in a
> dorm room?
And if blacks are so smart, how come they are so poor **as a group** -
in fact in virtually every society around the world they do worse off
than the native population be it Canada, be it the UK, be it their
homeland, i.e. Africa? Why is that?
Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD <irahumperdinkMD@hotmail.com>
> White - 41.3%
> Black 35.39%
IQ is not everything, one dimensional kid.
If they measure in athletic ability:
Asian = 1%
White = 41%
Black = 94%
Social awareness, popularity:
Asian = negative 98%
White = 15%
Black = 75%
Popular Music ability:
Asian = 4%
White = 25%
Black = 80%
Ability to woo babes:
Asian = 0%
White = 5%
Black = 92%
Leadership/Political ability:
Asian = 1%
White = 10%
Black = 98%
Acting ability and Fun to chat with:
Asian = -25%
White = 0%
Black = +35%
Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD <irahumperdinkMD@hotmail.com>
> than the native population be it Canada, be it the UK, be it their
> homeland, i.e. Africa? Why is that?
native? canada's native population are illiterate indians and eskimos
-- who migrated from asia.
america's native population is indians, who run casinos. who is more
successful in america? blacks or american indians?
who are the most successful chinese? it's the hong kongers, who are
mixed race. their blood includes sailors and slave sailors from
europe and north africa, who are black.
RichAsianKid
Fake numbers! You know how we know this, doctor? There are negative
numbers here! And if you insist that these numbers are not fake, then
please kindly provide a reference for all of us. I've posted my
reference above for my numbers, as well as the table. Which journal
are these numbers published in? What table? In *.jpg please. Come on,
your credibility is at stake here!
Also, one very important point here. Note that Dr. Humperdink is
telling us that blacks outscore Asians in all these indices. Well,
look closer. Blacks *also* outscore whites in precisely all these
indices. No white internet poster (especially with their libertarian
bent, as those are the typical demographic on the internet) will ever
be afflicted with such self-flagellating hatred.
It seems that our resident doctor (pun intended!) is now stuck in a
position where he has to defend not only just how blacks are doing
better than Asians, but also doing better than whites. I'm sure we'll
all look forward to that.
PS - perhaps inadvertently he may also have confirmed the so-called r-
K theory in biology where blacks and Asians reside on opposite ends of
the spectrum on a whole range of biological indices. Perhaps that's
why he's a doctor afterall. Bwahahahahahaaaaaaa!!!!!
RichAsianKid
Yes, blacks do worse off than native Americans. Check out this from
the reputable Journal of Black Higher Education. On the 2005 SAT:
http://www.jbhe.com/images/issue49/college_admissions_test1.gif
Yes, African Americans score LOWEST out of ALL major ethnic groups in
SAT-M + SAT-V.
Tough, huh?
Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD <irahumperdinkMD@hotmail.com>
no matter what you say, my numbers are TRUE. blacks are superior to
asians on so many dimensions. white americans, and most asian
americans, admire more blacks heros than asian heros.
Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD <irahumperdinkMD@hotmail.com>
> Yes, blacks do worse off than native Americans. Check out this from
> the reputable Journal of Black Higher Education. On the 2005 SAT:
>
> http://www.jbhe.com/images/issue49/college_admissions_test1.gif
>
> Yes, African Americans score LOWEST out of ALL major ethnic groups in
> SAT-M + SAT-V.
the ONLY activity asians can claim superiority is test-taking and
saving money. blacks are superior in culture, music, sports,
politics, scoring with babes, looks, HAPPINESS, and being americans.
Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD <irahumperdinkMD@hotmail.com>
> Yes, African Americans score LOWEST out of ALL major ethnic groups in
> SAT-M + SAT-V.
>
> Tough, huh?
you are right, mr. one-trick pony. chinese are master test-takers.
unfortunately, that's ALL chinese can do well. if it does not involve
a written test, chinese can't do it! the joke is, chinese get A+ on
the driving test, but they are the worst drivers in america....
bwaaaaahahahahaha!
RichAsianKid
You forgot that blacks are also superior in incaceration rates, being
doped up, poverty, murder, and rape!
RichAsianKid
There's some truth to that, but thankfully those poor mainland Chinese
can't even afford a car, as they're as cheap and poor like black inner
city ghetto moms. So the rest of America is saved by their
incompetence.
At the same time blacks are so illiterate that they drop out of school
so whether it's written tests or oral tests or whatever that just does
not apply for them. I think the nation should just abandon this
utopian dream of "no child left behind" as you said blacks are so
superior in other things.
RichAsianKid
<irahumperdin...@hotmail.com>" <markdemer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
We're still waiting for that reference.
Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD <irahumperdinkMD@hotmail.com>
i bet given a vote between a black and chinaman president, Americans
would vote black 95% of the time.
Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD <irahumperdinkMD@hotmail.com>
> On Jan 26, 12:41 pm, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD
>
> <irahumperdin...@hotmail.com>" <markdemer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > Yes, African Americans score LOWEST out of ALL major ethnic groups in
> > > SAT-M + SAT-V.
>
> > > Tough, huh?
>
> > you are right, mr. one-trick pony. chinese are master test-takers.
> > unfortunately, that's ALL chinese can do well. if it does not involve
> > a written test, chinese can't do it! the joke is, chinese get A+ on
> > the driving test, but they are the worst drivers in america....
> > bwaaaaahahahahaha!
>
> There's some truth to that,
at last, we agree!!!!!
> At the same time blacks are so illiterate that they drop out of school
> so whether it's written tests or oral tests or whatever that just does
> not apply for them.
chinatown has gangs too, my friend. if you visit sing sing (as if you
aren't already there), you will see a sizable asian gang populaiton.
Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD <irahumperdinkMD@hotmail.com>
>
> <irahumperdin...@hotmail.com>" <markdemer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > Yes, African Americans score LOWEST out of ALL major ethnic groups in
> > > SAT-M + SAT-V.
>
> > > Tough, huh?
>
> > you are right, mr. one-trick pony. chinese are master test-takers.
> > unfortunately, that's ALL chinese can do well. if it does not involve
> > a written test, chinese can't do it! the joke is, chinese get A+ on
> > the driving test, but they are the worst drivers in america....
> > bwaaaaahahahahaha!
>
> There's some truth to that, but thankfully those poor mainland Chinese
> can't even afford a car,
and if you actually attend grad school in america one day, you will
bear witness to these brilliant chinese teaching assistants, hired
because they scored so high on the GRE/SAT/TOEFFL score. tell me,
sir, if these guys all scored perfect on their TOEFFL scores, WHY
CAN'T THEY SPEEEKEEE ENGLEEEEEEESSSSH?
Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD <irahumperdinkMD@hotmail.com>
GET A LOAD OF THESE SCORES TOEFFL scores:
1) whites: 50%
2) blacks: 25%
3) chinese: 99.8%
And then go to the classroom and watch the chinese TA speeekeee
engleeeesh! does Mr. 98.8% speekee better than the black grad
student? the white grad student??
So what do your tests scores prove?
RichAsianKid
Hire the white. The black is retarded, the Chinese is dyslexic.
RichAsianKid
White americans have no reason to vote for a black president - they
should vote white - it's in their own best interest.
Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD <irahumperdinkMD@hotmail.com>
white americans have a a dream, where black boy and black girls can
play equally in the playground. you chinaman don't understand this
dream. that's why america will always surge ahead to be a far greater
country than china, stuck in the ancient confuscious thinking, ever
can be.
Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD <irahumperdinkMD@hotmail.com>
>
> > 1) whites: 50%
> > 2) blacks: 25%
> > 3) chinese: 99.8%
>
> > And then go to the classroom and watch the chinese TA speeekeee
> > engleeeesh! does Mr. 98.8% speekee better than the black grad
> > student? the white grad student??
> > So what do your tests scores prove?
>
> Hire the white. The black is retarded, the Chinese is dyslexic.
the chinese cheated on his test by memorizing cheap tricks to get a
high score even when he can't speeeckeee english. beware of chinaman
-- he's a master test high scorer. all chinese scores should be
rescaled by 50% to correct for test-taking bias.
RichAsianKid
<irahumperdin...@hotmail.com>" <markdemer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 27, 7:11 am,RichAsianKid<richasian...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jan 27, 5:53 am, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD
>
> > <irahumperdin...@hotmail.com>" <markdemer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Jan 26, 12:39 pm, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD
>
> > > > <irahumperdin...@hotmail.com>" <markdemer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Yes, blacks do worse off than native Americans. Check out this from
> > > > > > the reputable Journal of Black Higher Education. On the 2005 SAT:
>
> > > > > > http://www.jbhe.com/images/issue49/college_admissions_test1.gif
>
> > > > > > Yes, African Americans score LOWEST out of ALL major ethnic groups in
> > > > > > SAT-M + SAT-V.
>
> > > > > the ONLY activity asians can claim superiority is test-taking and
> > > > > saving money. blacks are superior in culture, music, sports,
> > > > > politics, scoring with babes, looks, HAPPINESS, and being americans.
>
> > > > You forgot that blacks are also superior in incaceration rates, being
> > > > doped up, poverty, murder, and rape!
>
> > > i bet given a vote between a black and chinaman president, Americans
> > > would vote black 95% of the time.
>
> > White americans have no reason to vote for a black president - they
> > should vote white - it's in their own best interest.
>
> white americans have a a dream, where black boy and black girls can
> play equally in the playground. you chinaman don't understand this
> dream. that's why america will always surge ahead to be a far greater
> country than china, stuck in the ancient confuscious thinking, ever
> can be.
Tell us doctor why should smart white Americans mingle with dumb black
Americans? I don't think it's just chinaman who don't understand but
Asians or, oh, say, Israeli Jews, will not understand this either.
Japanese have robots to take care of domestic chores for instance, so
please tell us why is it that whites in America have to put up with
this crap about the virtues of diversity?
RichAsianKid
Like I said, hire the white. No need to repeat yourself. The black is
retarded as usual, while the Chinese is dyslexic....or at any rate
can't speak.
Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD <irahumperdinkMD@hotmail.com>
smart white americans comingle with beautiful smart black americans.
like jackie chan try to mingle with black movie stars to turn is C
grade chinaman kung fu fighting movies into A grade.
C grade movie + black movie star = A grade movie
Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD <irahumperdinkMD@hotmail.com>
> retarded as usual, while the Chinese is dyslexic....or at any rate
> can't speak.
no, you are wrong, my friend. the chinese is dumb robot, whose high
test scores can be replaced by a japanese robot. but let's see
jackie chan replace the superstar black comedian in his movies with a
chinese who scored perfect on his GRE and MCAT. bwaahahahahahaha
Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD <irahumperdinkMD@hotmail.com>
racistasiankid, your philosophy matches hitlers exactly -- except that
hilter would not like you because you're not aryan. are you aiming to
be the chinese hitler?
Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD <irahumperdinkMD@hotmail.com>
caroline kennedy endorses obama. she has vision for the future.
Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD <irahumperdinkMD@hotmail.com>
> Yes, African Americans score LOWEST out of ALL major ethnic groups in
> SAT-M + SAT-V.
what do scores prove? chinese score highest on USA's SAT scores. but
china his lower per capita income than brazil and 250 million peasants
in poverty. and chinese students can't speakee englisheee even though
they boast a perfect score in toeffl. and the american student with
the lower GRE score does much better in the graduate program.
Tak To
>
> [...] and the american student with
> the lower GRE score does much better in the graduate program.
Reference?
Tak
--
----------------------------------------------------------------+-----
Tak To ta...@alum.mit.eduxx
--------------------------------------------------------------------^^
[taode takto ~{LU5B~}] NB: trim the xx to get my real email addr
RichAsianKid
http://i25.tinypic.com/v5e9hj.jpg
Whoa! Whoa! Whoa!! If you have a black and a white together getting
the SAME combined SAT score, the black underperforms. Isn't that sad?
And I'd like to know how successful subsaharan African is. People say
Kenya is one of the most successful East African countries, and the
GDP is a pathetic $1600 US per capita!! In other words, it's even
lower than India's GDP per capita!!!!
RichAsianKid
I admit this is black people's forte: their ability to cry 'racist'
just about any time. Whenever there's something they don't like or
whenever they fail, they will scream "Racist!" or "Hitler" or
whatever. Seems like they have taken Godwin's Law too seriously....
RichAsianKid
The black is still retarded. Remember this: http://i25.tinypic.com/v5e9hj.jpg
Hahahahahahahaaaaaa!!!! Though a black and a white appear the same on
paper, they do **not** subsequently perform the same. Scores
OVERpredict blacks' performance, relative to whites'.
I think blacks should just stick to being comedians or actors (sort of
like the court jesters of yesteryears) as that's the thing they are
good at -- as you seem to say or imply.
RichAsianKid
Why should white americans want their children to dumb down? I've
posted this before -
http://i14.tinypic.com/6kpn2hj.jpg
Reference: Udry JR, Li RM, Hendrickson-Smith J: Health and behavior
risks of adolescents with mixed-race identity. Am J Public Health
2003, 93:1865-1870.
Total sample size: 83,135 + 18,924, based on the National Longitudinal
Study of Adolescent Health from grades 7 through 12 during 1994-1995.
Sample size is therefore HUGE.
Now, look at the results. Can someone tell me why anyone would like to
mix with a black? Look at the GPA scores of the child, especially
between Asian and black. The child's achievements in most cases become
becomes virtually black. Likewise for other groups. Just look at it
yourself if you don't believe me. Here, I type it out for you:
Percentage of children reaching the 75th percentile (if distribution
is average or 'normal' it should be 25%) -- i.e. higher the better:
"Pure"
White - 32.27 Black - 15.45 American Indian - 14.97 Asian 43.16
"Mixed"
White/black 24.19
White/American Indian 27.10
White/Asian 37.58
Black/American Indian 18.79
Black/Asian 18.57
Asian/American Indian 21.82
Now, let's control for parental education:
http://i14.tinypic.com/6kpn2hj.jpg
Controlling for a college-educated parent, the percentages of students
who score over the 75th percentile are (i.e. higher number the better,
baseline should be 25%):
"Pure" race adolescents:
Asian 60.8%
White - 41.3%
Black 35.39%
Mixed race adolescents:
White/Asian 52.36%
White/Black 39.46%
Black/Asian 35.81%
More importantly, from the SAT, children from black households that
make over $100,000 score LOWER than children from white households
that make less than $10,000. Amazing isn't it?