Thats was one of the intents of civil RICO.
We have some unanswered questions that need addressed by the courts and lordships, like how we apply as attorney generals for the cooperation of the regulatory agencies.
If you read the basic law, there are references to this "attorney general" who does not exist, after the handover. Yet old english common law, qui tam and pro se litigants using rico statutes, many cases of which were supported by common law prerogative writs should be upheld in the HKSAR.
Also, in 2012 the HKSAR approved a policy to bring in overseas judges to hear trials. Why not bring the same judges that oversaw those RICO predicates (see my blog).
Today I am finishing up research on the definitions and challenges of common law conspiracy. It is a common misconception that RICO was drafted to fight "mafia" which is a cultural phenomenon.
I have a few cases myself. Common law RICO will keep the free(er) market in Hong kong ethical and honest. Also, we can establish an implementation agent that the mainland will use as a model for its own public interest subrogation litigations. So-called austerity measures.
Thus, guaranting that the basic law will remain intact and strengthening the dual-system of "One china, two policies".
In the meantime I have my crowdfunding project:
http://www.gofundme.com/4kgebc
My blog:
http://lassiezfaire.blogspot.com/
naturedoes...@gmail.com
"Congress incorporated a civil remedy authorizing treble damages plus reasonable counsel fees for racketeering victims. Based in part on the antitrust model, civil RICO sought both to deter violations and to stimulate private enforcement by encouraging an army of private attorneys general to take on complex racketeering claims." --Judicial Immunity for White-Collar Crime: The Ironic Demise of Civil Rico