中國收回新加坡

oops

unread,

Mar 4, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/4/98

to

> >
> > Definitely!!!
> > As the wiseman says.......one can forget anything but cannot forget his
> > roots!!!
>
> > >>新加坡的華人也自稱中國人嗎？
> > >
> > >Yes --- 他們叫自己 “ 華人”
> > >
>
> 新加坡的中國人，為什麼不跟大陸統一？這算不算數典忘祖？~}
>
> > >--------------------------------------------------

世界上全體有中國血統的都是華人

大陸人，台灣人不過是華人的一部分

大陸，台灣是政治家攪分裂

要統一，還原國號 -- 中國 CHINA --- 就是了

--OOPS--

Jeremy Law

unread,

Mar 4, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/4/98

to

台灣只係一個地方名, 佢o既國號係中華民國, 係國父孫中山先生成立o既中華民國,
即係中國, 中華民國一日未亡, 一日都係真正o既中國, 共產黨果個叫中華人民共和國,
係後起o既, 要改的話應該係共產黨改番個國號做中華民國, 然後結束一黨專政,
咁先係真正o既統一!

E. Kong

unread,

Mar 4, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/4/98

to

Are you crazy?
Should China take over Canada?
There'a a lot of Chinese there.
I stay there for six years.
No way!
Singapore is a country.
Are you dreaming?

oops <oops...@hotmail.com> 次寫入到主題
<6dirh8$7...@bgtnsc03.worldnet.att.net>...

> > >
> > > Definitely!!!
> > > As the wiseman says.......one can forget anything but cannot forget
his
> > > roots!!!
> >
> > > >>新加坡的華人也自稱中國人嗎？
> > > >
> > > >Yes --- 他們叫自己 “ 華人”
> > > >
> >
> > 新加坡的中國人，為什麼不跟大陸統一？這算不算數典忘祖？~}
> >
> > > >--------------------------------------------------
>

JL

unread,

Mar 4, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/4/98

to

講得好!

Jeremy Law wrote:
>
> 台灣只係一個地方名, 佢o既國號係中華民國, 係國父孫中山先生成立o既中華民國,
> 即係中國, 中華民國一日未亡, 一日都係真正o既中國, 共產黨果個叫中華人民共和國,
> 係後起o既, 要改的話應該係共產黨改番個國號做中華民國, 然後結束一黨專政,
> 咁先係真正o既統一!
>

esung

unread,

Mar 4, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/4/98

to lc...@netvigator.com

Jeremy Law wrote:
>
> 台灣只係一個地方名, 佢o既國號係中華民國, 係國父孫中山先生成立o既中華民國,
> 即係中國, 中華民國一日未亡, 一日都係真正o既中國, 共產黨果個叫中華人民共和國,
> 係後起o既, 要改的話應該係共產黨改番個國號做中華民國, 然後結束一黨專政,
> 咁先係真正o既統一!

--
我支持你呢種講法
不過，我都唔知你 o岩唔o岩架
只知o岩我聽咋
點解？
我話耶穌發明果個教係天主教
後來馬丁路德唔順超，自立誓反教
誓反唔好聽，來到中國譯做基督教
咁
我話一係唔好飲可樂，要飲就飲 classic coke
咪飲埋哂的唔三唔四 coke
(IBM clone 點計數我就分唔清楚喇)
加拿大啤硬係無神 Canadian 啦，唔係美國啤德國啤丫馬
要信上帝就信天主教喇
要愛國
就愛孫紅棍打倒滿清建立的中華民國

do do
me me
so so
me re
me do
la so la
me la
so fa so

---------------------------------------------
整罐 Canadian 啦。

但求意識大膽，極富爭議性，但絕不賣弄色情
Just to provide a voice where there is none.

一怒一老，一笑一少

新登場: PoliceScanner.com 歡迎偷聽紐約，羅省警察電話

http://home.bc.rogers.wave.ca/sungyle/index.htm
我自己的 message board, 以後寫乜都唔怕俾人 kill, 請來發嗡瘋啦

-------------------------------------------------------------

esung

unread,

Mar 4, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/4/98

to Black Sun

Black Sun wrote:
>
> Big China should take over a whole world.

--
overseas Chinese should take back China and liberate her from the
commies.
then 功成身退，生而不有，為而不恃，功成而不居
tra-la

Black Sun

unread,

Mar 5, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/5/98

to

Big China should take over a whole world.

E. Kong wrote in message <01bd4762$5f658de0$fa6a8bd0@stocks>...

>Are you crazy?
>Should China take over Canada?
>There'a a lot of Chinese there.
>I stay there for six years.
>No way!
>Singapore is a country.
>Are you dreaming?
>
>oops <oops...@hotmail.com> 次寫入到主題
><6dirh8$7...@bgtnsc03.worldnet.att.net>...
>> > >
>> > > Definitely!!!
>> > > As the wiseman says.......one can forget anything but cannot forget
>his
>> > > roots!!!
>> >
>> > > >>新加坡的華人也自稱中國人嗎？
>> > > >
>> > > >Yes --- 他們叫自己 “ 華人”
>> > > >
>> >
>> > 新加坡的中國人，為什麼不跟大陸統一？這算不算數典忘祖？~}
>> >
>> > > >--------------------------------------------------
>>

Herstein

unread,

Mar 5, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/5/98

to

Please don't confuse China with the chinese. I hate the term "overseas
chinese". If you have got a foreign passport, certainly you are not a
chinese. Everyone should be honest to his contury (not the govermemt) no
matter in what kind of conditions.

Lee Sau Dan ~{@nJX6X~}

unread,

Mar 5, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/5/98

to

>>>>> "Herstein" == Herstein <f127...@netvigator.com> writes:

Herstein> Please don't confuse China with the chinese. I hate the
Herstein> term "overseas chinese". If you have got a foreign
Herstein> passport, certainly you are not a chinese. Everyone
Herstein> should be honest to his contury (not the govermemt) no
Herstein> matter in what kind of conditions.

Please DON'T confuse "Chinese nationality" with "Chinese ethnicity".
They aren't equivalent concepts. One can be ethnically Chinese, but
nationally non-Chinese; and vice versa.

--
Lee Sau Dan 李守敦(Big5) ~{@nJX6X~}(HZ)
.----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
| http://www.cs.hku.hk/~sdlee e-mail: sd...@cs.hku.hk |
`----------------------------------------------------------------------------'

oops

unread,

Mar 5, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/5/98

to

>
> Herstein> Please don't confuse China with the chinese. I hate the
> Herstein> term "overseas chinese". If you have got a foreign
> Herstein> passport, certainly you are not a chinese. Everyone
> Herstein> should be honest to his contury (not the govermemt) no
> Herstein> matter in what kind of conditions.
>
> Please DON'T confuse "Chinese nationality" with "Chinese ethnicity".
> They aren't equivalent concepts. One can be ethnically Chinese, but
> nationally non-Chinese; and vice versa.
>
>

??? ??? ???

**AMERICAN BEATS OUT QWAN (關穎珊 )**

這是美國 MS-NBC 的大標題

你自己以為是美國人麼

人家又當你是什麼？

唉！！！

--oops--

Cowboy

unread,

Mar 6, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/6/98

to

對ㄚ,臺灣是中華民國的正統ㄚ!
請問何時光復中國呢?
拯救十億同胞?
________
　〝●●〞
發財Cowboy____________

esung 撰寫於文章 <34FD9B...@rogers.wave.ca>...

simonlwk

unread,

Mar 6, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/6/98

to

統一係好，但唔好用武力。
--
simonlwk

mailto:simo...@netvigator.com
ICQ:8552984

Cowboy <hkco...@netvigator.com> 次寫入到主題
<6dnh8s$kfe$1...@imsp009a.netvigator.com>...

柏拉圖

unread,

Mar 6, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/6/98

to

Lee Sau Dan ~{@nJX6X~} wrote:

> Please DON'T confuse "Chinese nationality" with "Chinese ethnicity".
> They aren't equivalent concepts. One can be ethnically Chinese, but
> nationally non-Chinese; and vice versa.
>

Question is, what does one mean when one says so and so is 'Chinese'?
If one does not hold a Chinese passport but is a Chinese descendent, is he or
isn't he 'Chinese'?

--
One, two, three, four, five
One, two, three, four, five
Ten in all.

Googolplex

unread,

Mar 6, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/6/98

to

嚴格來說,新加坡是一個獨立之國家,而台灣,請各位見諒,只可說是一流亡政府
,兩者不能共同比較

Pao-hung Lin

unread,

Mar 6, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/6/98

to

JL wrote:
>
> 講得好!

>
> Jeremy Law wrote:
> >
> > 台灣只係一個地方名, 佢o既國號係中華民國, 係國父孫中山先生成立o既中華民國,

> > 即係中國, 中華民國一日未亡, 一日都係真正o既中國, 共產黨果個叫中華人民共和國,
> > 係後起o既, 要改的話應該係共產黨改番個國號做中華民國, 然後結束一黨專政,
> > 咁先係真正o既統一!
> >

> > 世界上全體有中國血統的都是華人
> >

說得太好了，克林頓都成了華人了，華人都當上了美國總統，有啥不高興的？

不懂的人，自己去查查〔中亞民族遷移史〕

柏拉圖

unread,

Mar 7, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/7/98

to

Googolplex wrote:

> 嚴格來說,新加坡是一個獨立之國家,而台灣,請各位見諒,只可說是一流亡政府
> ,兩者不能共同比較
>
>

流亡政府是政府流亡到別人的國家裡。現在台灣的政府流亡到誰的國家？

Zhao Zilong

unread,

Mar 8, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/8/98

to

In article <35009414...@utopia.edu.tw>, "柏拉圖" <pla...@utopia.edu.tw> wrote:
>
>
>Googolplex wrote:
>
>> 嚴格來說,新加坡是一個獨立之國家,而台灣,請各位見諒,只可說是一流亡政府
>> ,兩者不能共同比較
>>
>>
>
>流亡政府是政府流亡到別人的國家裡。現在台灣的政府流亡到誰的國家？

台灣的政府流亡到家的邊疆﹐靠美佬保護﹐不受美佬承認為一自主的家﹒

柏拉圖

unread,

Mar 8, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/8/98

to

Zhao Zilong wrote:

> >流亡政府是政府流亡到別人的國家裡。現在台灣的政府流亡到誰的國家？
>
> 台灣的政府流亡到家的邊疆﹐靠美佬保護﹐不受美佬承認為一自主的家﹒

台灣的政府流亡到台灣？台灣是台灣的邊疆？

bb

unread,

Mar 12, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/12/98

to Zhao Zilong

Zhao Zilong wrote:

> In article <35009414...@utopia.edu.tw>, "柏拉圖" <pla...@utopia.edu.tw> wrote:
> >
> >
> >Googolplex wrote:
> >
> >> 嚴格來說,新加坡是一個獨立之國家,而台灣,請各位見諒,只可說是一流亡政府
> >> ,兩者不能共同比較
> >>
> >>
> >

> >流亡政府是政府流亡到別人的國家裡。現在台灣的政府流亡到誰的國家？
>
> 台灣的政府流亡到家的邊疆﹐靠美佬保護﹐不受美佬承認為一自主的家﹒

放你的狗臭屁!

Edwin Cheung

unread,

Mar 13, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/13/98

to

流亡和偏安大有不同啊, 像趙宋政權由汴京遷至臨安, 在國土內的一部份地域內繼續統治, 是偏安;
相返, 西藏在印度的組織"流亡政府"就是流亡, 試想, 印度會否讓西藏流亡政府行駛法律?
雖然西藏流亡政府有其編制, 但其存在似乎以光復西藏為目標, 多於有效管治流亡政府轄區.....

Hudson Cheung

unread,

Mar 18, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/18/98

to oops...@hotmail.com

oops wrote:
﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒﹒

> **AMERICAN BEATS OUT QWAN (關穎珊 )**
> 這是美國 MS-NBC 的大標題
> 你自己以為是美國人麼
> 人家又當你是什麼？
> 唉！！！

美國确有不少人DISCRIMINATE華人

但華人得到外國國籍﹐到中國旅行時﹐
總是要付較當地人高的費用(外籍人收費)﹐
但在法律上常常又得不到“真正外國籍人”
的待遇(例﹕領事保護權)﹒

你自己以為是中國人麼﹖