REPLY TO MASS COMPLAINT RECEIVED THROUGH Mr.RANJEET SHINDE - 29-03-2018

[Hill Crest]

Dear Members,

Please find attached a pdf file containing the reply to Mass Complaint received through Mr.Ranjeet Shinde on 11/03/2018 along with Minutes of 17th AGM and proof of 49 kW load sanctioned through MSEB for Solar Project.

If the reply is not satisfied by the complainant (23 MEMBERS), the complained members can fix up an appointment with Management Committee on any Sunday for further clarification.

We are here in the Management Committee to work for the members, betterment of Society and not otherwise.

Dr.R.Govindan,

Hon'ble Secretary,

Hill Crest, Thane-400610.

Mobile: 9820627163 (Mon-Fri after 6 pm)

[Hill Crest]

Dear Mr.Kiran,

The question was asked by 23 members and hence you please tell all these 23 members to correct the question. Based on the question I replied. If you are able to get the question corrected by those Complainant, I will correct the answer accordingly. Thank you for writing to us.

On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 1:51 PM, kiran tare <kiran...@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Dr. Govindan,

In reply to question 12 (B) you have mentioned that we are not aware that what advertisement Mr. Tare did.

Please note that I have not done any advertisement. In fact, I had brought to your notice an advertisement done by local BJP corporator Mrs. Ambre. So you are requested to please correct the answer.

I appreciate your conclusion that I have not done anything wrong but the question was about the consent by committee members to Mrs. Ambre to use society's name in her advertisement. 

This is to clarify and subsequent correction, please.

Thank you.

On Fri, Mar 30, 2018, 12:42 AM Hill Crest <hillcres...@gmail.com> wrote:

This message is eligible for Automatic Cleanup! (hillcres...@gmail.com) Add cleanup rule | More info

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hillcrestsociety" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hillcrestsociety+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--

[Hill Crest]

Dear Mr.Barunkumar Paul,

As already mentioned in the reply that the current Management Committee did not violate any Bye-laws of Maharashtra CHS Act, 1960.

Coming to discussion of quotations of Solar Project during AGM, as we had lot of Agenda, we had precised our Agenda only to implementation of Solar Project and got sanctioned in the same as the time frame was 3rd November 2017.

Whatsapp Groups of Notice and Complaints is not meant for detailed discussion and hence I did not anticipate your query. Well. I have replied all to your queries in the complaint letter.

As the Solar Project is already implemented, please kindly refrain yourself in further discussion. We are ready to discuss face to face instead of letter as you may not get full solution to your queries.

On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 7:27 PM, barun paul <barun_p...@yahoo.com> wrote:

To,
 Govindanji and Others MC members,

1) I like to point out against your reply that you have never denied that
    there was gross violations of bye rules and missuse power of office bearers post
    to go ahead with single party for Solar Power Plant.
    We came to know that you have received three quotation from reply letter just now.
    You never mentioned in AGM that you have recd three quotation and among two
    was worthless. Why not communicated to all members thorugh Whatsapp?
    This is the case of non-transparency of current managing committee.

2) In what capacity and  power MC has decieded to reject or select or negotiate a party
    where cost of expenditure alomost 28 lakhs? Where are the original quotations ?  
    Why not you share in notice board , in whatsapp (IN AGM Mentioned to be shared in WA group)
    or in our email groups?

    This is violations of bye rules.

3) Yes, I have proposed but in principal but you have not bother or respect my post on 2nd Oct'17
    whatsapp group "Notice and complaints". Please note any big investment/expenditure MC always
    have to take nod of AGM but afterwards has to maintain thumb rules MCS act and bye rules. For finalisation
    of quotations or negotiations must be through EGM or SGM. Which is totally ignored for any reason may
    be conflicts of interest.
    In this case totally absent and bypasses.
    Here also no transparency and act of dictatorship which violate bye rules of MCS act.

4)  Before AGM you fixed , you decided  and you finalised a party where  expenditure is
     almost  28lakhs means its   Pre planned , already decided everything in advance. This is the act
     of concealing of the facts office bearers which is violations   of bye rules.

5)  Initially 50KW expenditure forecast  was 28L , so after decrease to 40KW why the price is the same?
     Why not negotiated to 20L bocz in solar power range of price s. 50 to 70/pu

6)  Those who have invested definitely getting interest on investment. So, that is does not means they have given certificate
     to MC  not to follow any bye rules. They are investor and they dont have to bother pros and cons of bye rules.
     As they(Investor) are also respected members of our society ; so there investment must be protected and to be safe
     whatever ups and downs in internal feud or differences.

7)  Lets we have others members also and we all unitedly take future course of action.

8) Atleast I am not agree with your reply and a lot of others which already in our complaints letter.


B Paul
1/301

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hillcrestsociety" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hillcrestsociety+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--