Hi All,
First the good news ... :-)
I've been using hibernate shards in a test environment under load and
it performs quite respectably when compared with non-sharded
hibernate.
As the load has increased, I see (and expect)
StaleObjectStateException, which I handle by re-running the
transaction. I know this from running non-sharded. However, when I
run sharded, I don't see any exceptions except the following ...
Thanks for your response.
Max Ross wrote:
> Shards depends on Hibernate 3.2, so it's not surprising that there are
> some api changes that break things at runtime.
OK, that's what I need to know.
> Getting it working on 3.3 shouldn't be hard, but unfortunately that's
> not something I'll have time to pursue for at least a month or so.
> However, I'd be happy to support you in this effort it you're
> interested in taking it on yourself. Let me know.
I'd be interested in doing that, but right now I'm straining for the
finish line on a high-profile release.
I will fall back to Hibernate 3.2 in the meantime.
Cheers!
David