Dear HGVS Nomenclature Team,
Thank you for the excellent work you do to empower so many clinical, research, and other enterprises that make use of molecular genetic information! I am writing to ask your advice on feedback on a planned tool.
Tool Being Considered: I have been considering building a tool to convert HGVS Nomenclature to ISCN, but would like to reach out to you before investing time in it.
Motivating Use-Case: The institution I work at (Michigan Medicine) is in the early stages of bringing up a WGS assay for children with a presumed genetic diagnosis. Because many pediatricians and other health professionals have long depending on cytogenetics
and karyotyping in this context, I thought it might be judicious to include ISCN nomenclature in the final report, even though the core assay will be a next generation sequencing assay that will issue as output either a VCF or perhaps gVCF.
As we plan to annotate any/all genetic variants using HGVS, I thought a conceptually clean approach might be to write a tool that converts HGVS nomenclature to ISCN nomenclature for a given (structural) variant. I looked at other available reports from academic
medical centers who offer WGS as a service, and it appears that these institutions also do this.
Does such a tool already exist? Before proceeding, I looked around as much as I could to see if such a tool already exists. In doing so, I found a few private companies that I think must have a tool like this - but I did not find an open-sourced tool.
I also checked HGVS's pages themselves, and found several relevant pages, e.g.
Here again some related tools exist, but I don't see a direct corollary ... So, I wanted to ask,
-
- Does this exist already somewhere I missed?
- Does HGVS have plans to tackle this, perhaps in collaboration with ISCN?
- Do you have recommendations or advice I might learn from?
- Is this an area of interest of yours?
- Any other advice or notes on how to proceed, if you think the idea is meaningful?
Planned Approach: Unless the tool exists or the tool doesnt have merit, I was going to ask if this would be along the lines of a planned approach you might recommend or support: As per 2nd link,
-
Fork the hgvs-nomenclature repo
-
Create a new entry in the docs/software/ directory, using an existing entry as a template
-
Build the documentation locally (see README.md) to ensure that your software entry appears as intended
-
Submit the tool to a peer reviewed journal
-
Submit a pull request once done
Thanks very much for your advice and feedback,
Vincent Laufer, M.D., Ph.D.
(he, him, his)
UM Experimental Pathology Physician-Scientist Training Track
Fellow in Molecular Genetics 2023-2024
Instructor in Clinical Informatics 2024-2025
vla...@med.umich.edu
| Phone: (404) 594 9834 | Pager:
24131

- I am a
Compass Peer Supporter. Please feel free to reach out if you'd like someone to listen.
- My working day may not be your working day. I respect your boundaries around personal time, well being, caretaking and rest. If you receive correspondence
from me outside your working hours, please do not feel obliged to reply until you are at work.
**********************************************************
Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not be used for urgent or sensitive issues