Dear HGVS team,
I would
like to follow up on the question I raised in May 2024 regarding the
correct HGVS description of DNA insertions that encode a stop codon. At
that time, you confirmed that such variants should be described as
insertions, regardless of whether the inserted sequence length is a
multiple of three.
However, this point remains a source of
confusion within the community. Major tools such as Variant Validator,
Mutalyzer, and VEP still appear to apply the "multiple of three" rule as
the primary criterion for deciding between a frameshift and an
insertion (or a delins), without considering whether the inserted
sequence encodes a stop codon.
This suggests that the current
HGVS guidelines are not sufficiently clear on this point. To help avoid
inconsistent variant descriptions across tools, databases, and
publications, I would like to kindly reiterate my request for clarifying
the guidelines.
Kind Regards,
David Hernandez
Sophia Genetics SA