Dear Sudhisha,
Ah, I see... For a variant to be universally recognizable, the HGVS variant nomenclature requires the use of reference sequences. As such, there cannot be two reference bases on one position. The reference sequence either indicates there is an A, or there is
a C. So whether you should use c.293-13A>G or c.293-13C>G, depends on the (genomic!) reference sequence that you used for the detection of this variant. As intronic bases are not part of the transcript, NM_000500.9 can only be used for the exonic sequence.
If hg19/GRCh37 was used, the valid DNA description is NC_000006.11(NM_000500.9):c.293-13C>G. If hg38/GRCh38 was used, the valid description is NC_000006.12(NM_000500.9):c.293-13C>G.
Assuming hg38/GRCh38 was used, combined with c.955C>T, the resulting description is NC_000006.12(NM_000500.9):c.[293-13C>G;955C>T] for the combination of the two in cis.
The valid protein description is then, indicating that RNA was not analyzed as the effect of the first variant is unknown, NP_000491.4:p.[?;(Gln319Ter)], or NP_000491.4:p.[?;(Q319*)] in short.
From: Sudhisha Dubey <
sudhis...@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2025 18:35
To: Fokkema, Ivo (HG - LUMC) <
I.F.A.C...@lumc.nl>
Subject: Re: [hgvs-nomenclature] HGVS nomenclature of mutations in cis
Dear Ivo Fokkema
Thank you for the query.
i2g, is a single nucleotide variant also known as intron splice 2 mutation of CYP21A2 gene [NM_000500.9], also written
as c.293-13A/C>G [rs6467]
It is a known pathogenic mutation that is quite prevalent in patients with Congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH).
It is present in intron 2, 13 bases before c.293 position in exon 3. Please see below its location in the intron (in red).
At this position i.e. -13, either A or C base is present and both A and C are wild-type. Only when A and C are replaced by G, spicing error
takes place. So it can be written as c.293-13A>G or
c.293-13C>G [rs6467] depending on the type of wild-type allele (A or C) present in the patient. But commonly it is written
as c.293-13A/C>G when it is collectively written for more patients.
It is predicted to result in a new splice acceptor site thus affecting the function of the protein.
This mutation has been found in cis with another mutation p.Gln319* of the CYP21A2 gene in some of our CAH patients. I wish to report this mutation in a correct way.
Since
effect of i2g mutation on the protein can not be predicted accurately, I think it should be written as p.[ (?);Gln319*].
I would appreciate your expert opinion on the correct HGVS nomenclature for these two variants that occur in cis, one splice mutation whose protein effect can not be reliably predicted and another with known protein change.
Could you please advise whether the protein-level representation
p.[(?);Gln319*] is correct according to current HGVS recommendations.
Location of i2g mutation
Transcript: ENST00000418967.2
CYP21A2-002
Intron 2
gtaagggccgggggcattttttctttcttaaaaaaatttttttttaagagatgggttctt
gctatgctgcccaggctggtcttaaattcctagtctcaaatgatcctcccacctcagcct
caagtgtgagccacctttggggcatccccaatccaggtccctggaagctcttgggggggc
atatctggtggggagaaagcaggggttggggaggccgaagaaggtcaggccctcagctgc
cttcatcagttcccaccctccagcccccacctcctcctgcag { it could be A instead of C}
Exon3
293 ACAAGCTGGTGTCTAGGAACTACCCGGACCTGTCCTTGGGAGACTACTCCCTGCTCTGGA
352
353 AAGCCCACAAGAAGCTCACCCGCTCAGCCCTGCTGCTGGGCATCCGTGACTCCATGGAGC
412
413 CAGTGGTGGAGCAGCTGACCCAGGAGTTCTGTGAG
447
Regards
Sudhisha