Hg 1.9 breaking remote Git pushes?

36 views
Skip to first unread message

Doug Stewart

unread,
Jul 7, 2011, 2:56:46 PM7/7/11
to hg-git
Howdy all,
I updated to Hg 1.9 (Mac OS X 10.6.8) and now get

powell:elbee-elgee stewartd4$ hg outgoing gh
comparing with git+ssh://g...@github.com/zamoose/Elbee-Elgee.git
importing Hg objects into Git
["git-receive-pack '/zamoose/Elbee-Elgee.git'"]
Permission denied (publickey).
abort: the remote end hung up unexpectedly
powell:elbee-elgee stewartd4$


or similar every time I try remote actions against Git repos,
particularly on Github. Any ideas what might be causing this?

Augie Fackler

unread,
Jul 7, 2011, 3:19:36 PM7/7/11
to hg-...@googlegroups.com
Do you have hg-git installed from head? The currently released version
doesn't support 1.9 (head has some bugs that I'd like to fix before
releasing...)

> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hg-git" group.
> To post to this group, send email to hg-...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hg-git+un...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hg-git?hl=en.
>
>

Doug Stewart

unread,
Jul 7, 2011, 3:47:56 PM7/7/11
to hg-...@googlegroups.com
I have the version pulled by easy_install which reports as 0.2.6, I think?

--
-Doug

Augie Fackler

unread,
Jul 7, 2011, 3:48:58 PM7/7/11
to hg-...@googlegroups.com
0.2.6 won't work against hg 1.9. Try installing hg-git from bitbucket:
http://bitbucket.org/durin42/hg-git

Doug Stewart

unread,
Jul 7, 2011, 3:53:12 PM7/7/11
to hg-...@googlegroups.com
cloned and a `make tests` in the hg-git directory results in:

Failed test-git-workflow: output changed
Failed test-incoming: output changed
Failed test-outgoing: output changed
Failed test-sane-without-bookmarks: output changed
# Tested unexpected mercurial: None
# Ran 24 tests, 0 skipped, 4 failed.
make: *** [tests] Error 1

Doug Stewart

unread,
Jul 7, 2011, 3:58:28 PM7/7/11
to hg-...@googlegroups.com
There were a few complaints referring specifically to bookmarks. I'm
wondering if the way 1.9 handles them has changed enough to cause the
issues...?


--
-Doug

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages