Overnight in the camper
Daniel MacKay
on Musquodoboit Harbour which is really a stationary 40-year-old
Winnebago. So - yesterday the stars were aligned; we were in the area,
nothing to do today, not too cold overnight.
It was awesome to wake up this morning with the snain pelting the roof
and the interior toasty from the ooooold propane furnace. Here's the pic:
http://bonmot.ca/~daniel/winnie/?nr=4
(other pics are also of the Winnie cabin.)
--
Daniel MacKay
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Rob
Awesome, I would love to be camping last night or tonight.
Richard Bonner
> My new man has been champing at the bit to spend a night in my "cabin"
> on Musquodoboit Harbour which is really a stationary 40-year-old
> Winnebago. So - yesterday the stars were aligned; we were in the area,
> nothing to do today, not too cold overnight.
> It was awesome to wake up this morning with the snain pelting the roof
> and the interior toasty from the ooooold propane furnace.
(Snip)
> --
> Daniel MacKay
*** I hope its roof is snain proof and that you have a CO detector. (-:
Richard
Peter
"Richard Bonner" <ak...@chebucto.ns.ca> wrote in message
news:hhr4nl$cmo$8...@Kil-nws-1.UCIS.Dal.Ca...
Snain proof? :-)
Peter
<lucreti...@fl.it> wrote in message
news:d7a2k59mi50g4ns5t...@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 18:26:17 -0500, "Peter" <n...@email.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Richard Bonner" <ak...@chebucto.ns.ca> wrote in message
>>>
>>> (-:
>>>
>>> Richard
>>
>>Snain proof? :-)
>>
Cool, new word to me, I'll remember that.
Daniel MacKay
ak...@chebucto.ns.ca (Richard Bonner) wrote:
> *** I hope its roof is snain proof and that you have a CO detector. (-:
It's the Winnie's built-in propane furnace - it has its own flue and
combustion air supply so it's good. You can see it - it's tall (but
it's only about 5" deep) at the extreme right side here:
http://bonmot.ca/~daniel/winnie/?nr=5
Richard Bonner
> ak...@chebucto.ns.ca (Richard Bonner) wrote:
> > *** I hope its roof is snain proof and that you have a CO
> > detector. (-:
> It's the Winnie's built-in propane furnace - it has its own flue and
> combustion air supply so it's good.
> --
> Daniel MacKay
*** Still, in such a confined space, a detector would be a good
investment.
Richard
Jack
I'm gonna puke
Justin Cyder
Ditto, nothing better than waking up to a hairy arse with a bunch of
black grapes hanging out of it caused by bum-fucking from a queer
photographer,staring you in the face inside a 40yr old shed.
Hmmm,fancy cheese for breakfast my queer new man, then chew on my
foreskin with the shit still clinging to it.
Oops, did i come across(your back/face) as homophobic?
James Warren
A little delicate are we Jack? :)
--
jw
"Science is a candle in the dark" - Carl Sagan.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5wV_REEdvxo
http://video.stumbleupon.com/#p=e5xdcxablf
James Warren
You know a lot about this, don't you? :)
Justin Cyder
>
> - Show quoted text -
Naa James, just a very vivid imagination. :)
It's like the loveshack for homeless gay people.
James Warren
> On Jan 4, 12:57 pm, James Warren <jwwarren...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Justin Cyder wrote:
>>> On Jan 4, 12:15 pm, Jack <bigcle...@yahoo.com.com> wrote:
>>>> Daniel MacKay wrote:
>>>>> My new man has been champing at the bit to spend a night in my "cabin"
>>>>> on Musquodoboit Harbour which is really a stationary 40-year-old
>>>>> Winnebago. So - yesterday the stars were aligned; we were in the area,
>>>>> nothing to do today, not too cold overnight.
>>>>> It was awesome to wake up this morning with the snain pelting the roof
>>>>> and the interior toasty from the ooooold propane furnace. Here's the pic:
>>>>> http://bonmot.ca/~daniel/winnie/?nr=4
>>>>> (other pics are also of the Winnie cabin.)
>>>> I'm gonna puke
>>> Ditto, nothing better than waking up to a hairy arse with a bunch of
>>> black grapes hanging out of it caused by bum-fucking from a queer
>>> photographer,staring you in the face inside a 40yr old shed.
>>> Hmmm,fancy cheese for breakfast my queer new man, then chew on my
>>> foreskin with the shit still clinging to it.
>>> Oops, did i come across(your back/face) as homophobic?
>> You know a lot about this, don't you? :)
>
> It's like the loveshack for homeless gay people.
Why do you imagine such things? :)
--
jw
"Science is a candle in the dark" - Carl Sagan.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5wV_REEdvxo
http://video.stumbleupon.com/#p=e5xdcxablf
Justin Cyder
> On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 08:42:41 -0800 (PST), Justin Cyder
>
> <bobbrow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Ditto, nothing better than waking up to a hairy arse with a bunch of
> >black grapes hanging out of it caused by bum-fucking from a queer
> >photographer,staring you in the face inside a 40yr old shed.
> >Hmmm,fancy cheese for breakfast my queer new man, then chew on my
> >foreskin with the shit still clinging to it.
> >Oops, did i come across(your back/face) as homophobic?
>
> surprises you sell cars !
And no surprises I don't munch assholes either!! And as for you,you
old cow, how about stop hiding behind a fake eye-tye name and putting
up your SCOTTISH name so that all the old grannies can see you for who
you really are.
I'm not hiding anything.
Many of my customers are gay but they don't ram it down my
throat,pardon the pun!!!
PS,according to the wee scottish granny here, ALL,REPEAT ALL,car
salespersons are shit. She must take the bus,and we know what bus
drivers are like,eh?
Justin Cyder
> On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 08:42:41 -0800 (PST), Justin Cyder
>
> <bobbrow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >black grapes hanging out of it caused by bum-fucking from a queer
> >photographer,staring you in the face inside a 40yr old shed.
> >Hmmm,fancy cheese for breakfast my queer new man, then chew on my
> >foreskin with the shit still clinging to it.
> >Oops, did i come across(your back/face) as homophobic?
>
> surprises you sell cars !
So this elderly italian/scottish woman walks into an automobile
showroom and a salesperson walks up to her an welcomes her to the
dealership.
"Fuck off", she replies,"you must be a scottish homophobic
asshole to work here."
The salesperson replies,'So,you're looking for a job,eh?"
Justin Cyder
> On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 12:52:57 -0800 (PST), Justin Cyder
>
> <bobbrow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >And no surprises I don't munch assholes either!! And as for you,you
> >old cow, how about stop hiding behind a fake eye-tye name and putting
> >up your SCOTTISH name so that all the old grannies can see you for who
> >you really are.
> >I'm not hiding anything.
> >Many of my customers are gay but they don't ram it down my
> >throat,pardon the pun!!!
>
>
>
>
> >PS,according to the wee scottish granny here, ALL,REPEAT ALL,car
> >salespersons are shit. She must take the bus,and we know what bus
> >drivers are like,eh?
>
> where I take my car, anything rather than O'Regans.
Guid for you auld quinie,I widn't tak my cars to O'Regan's either. Kin
ye spik doric at a?
John
Well, then don't go camping with gay guys? Seems simple enough.
Cheers,
John
Justin Cyder
>
> - Show quoted text -
I didn't want to read it either John. I don't mind the photos he
posts. Unless he show's 'Up at the crack of don"
Peter
"James Warren" <jwwar...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:hhtinq$6uv$1...@Kil-nws-1.UCIS.Dal.Ca...
No kidding. The (maybe not so) straight guy certainly imagines (or is that
dreams?) quite a bit about the man on man action in the woods.
Jack
> Jack wrote:
>> Daniel MacKay wrote:
>>> My new man has been champing at the bit to spend a night in my
>>> "cabin" on Musquodoboit Harbour which is really a stationary
>>> 40-year-old Winnebago. So - yesterday the stars were aligned; we
>>> were in the area, nothing to do today, not too cold overnight.
>>>
>>> It was awesome to wake up this morning with the snain pelting the
>>> roof and the interior toasty from the ooooold propane furnace. Here's
>>> the pic:
>>>
>>> http://bonmot.ca/~daniel/winnie/?nr=4
>>>
>>> (other pics are also of the Winnie cabin.)
>>
>> I'm gonna puke
>
> A little delicate are we Jack? :)
>
Not at all...have seen my share of blood and guts over the years...it
just makes me nauseous ...
John
You're kind of sad and pathetic in that way. Seriously, grow a ball
and stop hassling people like a bully. Grow up, eh?
Jack
> On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 19:54:04 -0400, Jack <bigc...@yahoo.com.com>
> wrote:
>
>>>> I'm gonna puke
>>> A little delicate are we Jack? :)
>>>
>> Not at all...have seen my share of blood and guts over the years...it
>> just makes me nauseous ...
>
could be...have this small growth on my abdomen...started about 2 years
ago...(or could be old age...)
Jack
Huh ?? WTF are you going on about ??
Jack
> get with all your foolishness about gays. Not interested, use your
> delete key and stop whining. It's not becoming to an adult.
>
yes Mommy..now pls fuck off
Jack
> On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:35:05 -0400, Jack <bigc...@yahoo.com.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>>>> Huh ?? WTF are you going on about ??
>>>
>>> It was pretty clear to me. You're about as childish as a person can
>>> get with all your foolishness about gays. Not interested, use your
>>> delete key and stop whining. It's not becoming to an adult.
>>>
>> yes Mommy..now pls fuck off
>
>
> you're my age, you will have grown up some and left the bigoted crap
> behind.
>
Donna I apologize to you for tell you to FO...I'm sorry...sincerely...
Jack
>>>
>>> It was pretty clear to me. You're about as childish as a person can
>>> get with all your foolishness about gays. Not interested, use your
>>> delete key and stop whining. It's not becoming to an adult.
>>>
>> yes Mommy..now pls fuck off
>
>
> you're my age, you will have grown up some and left the bigoted crap
> behind.
>
My opinion on a lifestyle is mine..call it bigoted, call it traditional,
call it whatever you wish..I will not apologize for my opinion on
this..ever.
Normally its the lefties who resort to name-calling when they don't
agree...you've confirmed it. Thanks
Brian Smith
>
> My opinion on a lifestyle is mine..call it bigoted, call it traditional,
> call it whatever you wish..I will not apologize for my opinion on
> this..ever.
>
> Normally its the lefties who resort to name-calling when they don't
> agree...you've confirmed it. Thanks
Normal behaviour versus abnormal behaviour, Jack.
Brian Smith
>
> In your mind yes so, by all means, don't engage in homosexual
> activity. For others, it's very normal. It's not the norm (not the
> same as normal) since a larger proportion of the population is
> straight.
*Norm* is the same as *normal*. It is a good thing that a larger
percentage of the population is straight (AKA normal) or else there
would be either no people left on the planet or a very small population
of us existing today.
James Warren
A smaller population might in fact be a good thing.
--
jw (a.k.a. Nagilum)
John
Maybe there's an increasing prevalence of homosexuality as nature's
way of slowing population growth. Then again that would mean genetic
material is "aware" and somehow knows the current population figures.
Or is there some other way? I am just speculating for fun.
James Warren
It works in rats. High density living conditions decreases fertility and
increases homosexuality rates. It was explained by the effects of stress in
the brain. Its a vague memory. Maybe a google search will find it.
--
jw (a.k.a. Nagilum)
JD
"John" <jvan...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:550d18c0-1e89-4fc2...@l2g2000vbg.googlegroups.com...
*** Cool speculation, but I believe homosexuality rates are the same as they
always were, but people are more tolerant nowadays. Back in the day, even
people you suspected were gay didn't generally admit.
James Warren
Rick Walker
"JD" wrote:
>
> *** Cool speculation, but I believe homosexuality rates are the same as
> they always were, but people are more tolerant nowadays. Back in the day,
> even people you suspected were gay didn't generally admit.
Rock Hudson kept it under wraps for years.
Jack
> life the way I want and thinks everyone should have that right without
> exception and without ridicule. If something a person does is not my
> style, I prefer to just move on.
>
So you are ok with polygamy ?? Bestiality ? Child porn ?? Those can
be argued as lifestyles as well.
If you don't stand for something, you stand for nothing.
Jack
> On Jan 5, 9:59 pm, James Warren <jwwarren...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Brian Smith wrote:
>>> On 1/5/2010 9:13 PM, Donna Whitman wrote:
>>>> In your mind yes so, by all means, don't engage in homosexual
>>>> activity. For others, it's very normal. It's not the norm (not the
>>>> same as normal) since a larger proportion of the population is
>>>> straight.
>>> *Norm* is the same as *normal*. It is a good thing that a larger
>>> percentage of the population is straight (AKA normal) or else there
>>> would be either no people left on the planet or a very small population
>>> of us existing today.
>> A smaller population might in fact be a good thing.
>>
>> --
>> jw (a.k.a. Nagilum)
>
> Maybe there's an increasing prevalence of homosexuality as nature's
> way of slowing population growth.
Same could be said of AIDS..what better population control in Africa?
Brian Smith
>
> Same could be said of AIDS..what better population control in Africa?
Droughts, famines, floods and diseases are all population controls as
well. Even wars can be considered a control.
James Warren
I dunno. To me sexual behaviour and a disease look a little different.
--
jw (a.k.a. Nagilum)
John
> On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 23:20:40 -0400, Jack <bigcle...@yahoo.com.com>
> wrote:
>
> >>> Normally its the lefties who resort to name-calling when they don't
> >>> agree...you've confirmed it. Thanks
>
> >> Leftie? Nah ....just a person who likes having the freedom to live my
> >> life the way I want and thinks everyone should have that right without
> >> exception and without ridicule. If something a person does is not my
> >> style, I prefer to just move on.
>
> >So you are ok with polygamy ?? Bestiality ? Child porn ?? Those can
> >be argued as lifestyles as well.
>
> >If you don't stand for something, you stand for nothing.
>
> when arguing against gay rights?
It's a sign of a maladjusted personality - a psychological issue. I
think one day scientists will discover a genetic connection. Meanwhile
all we can do is try to be tolerant toward homophobes and other people
haters and hope they live out their lifestyle without trying to push
the agenda too far, especially around children.
> It's as if you think it's a
> perversion. Oh, wait a minute, you do! When two consenting adults
> wish to have a relationship that gives them pleasure and/or enriches
> their lives, who are you or I to interfere? Not the same as boinking
> your dog or abusing children. No one is hurt.
James Warren
> On Wed, 06 Jan 2010 06:54:49 -0400, James Warren
> <jwwar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>>> Maybe there's an increasing prevalence of homosexuality as nature's
>>>> way of slowing population growth.
>>> Same could be said of AIDS..what better population control in Africa?
>> I dunno. To me sexual behaviour and a disease look a little different.
>
>
>
> presume you're straight and may have a wife? If so, do you define your
> relationship with her strictly by how many times you have sex or how
> you do it?
No I don't. I guess I should have been more precise and said sexual orientation.
I stand corrected. But, then again, the orientation usually leads to the
behaviour. :)
--
jw
"Science is a candle in the dark" - Carl Sagan.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5wV_REEdvxo
http://video.stumbleupon.com/#p=e5xdcxablf
James Warren
> On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 23:20:40 -0400, Jack <bigc...@yahoo.com.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>>>> Normally its the lefties who resort to name-calling when they don't
>>>> agree...you've confirmed it. Thanks
>>>
>>> Leftie? Nah ....just a person who likes having the freedom to live my
>>> life the way I want and thinks everyone should have that right without
>>> exception and without ridicule. If something a person does is not my
>>> style, I prefer to just move on.
>>>
>> So you are ok with polygamy ?? Bestiality ? Child porn ?? Those can
>> be argued as lifestyles as well.
>>
>> If you don't stand for something, you stand for nothing.
>>
>
>
> perversion. Oh, wait a minute, you do! When two consenting adults
> wish to have a relationship that gives them pleasure and/or enriches
> their lives, who are you or I to interfere? Not the same as boinking
> your dog or abusing children. No one is hurt.
Absolutely right!
James Warren
> On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 05:52:09 -0800 (PST), John <jvan...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> y
>
>>
>> It's a sign of a maladjusted personality - a psychological issue. I
>> think one day scientists will discover a genetic connection. Meanwhile
>> all we can do is try to be tolerant toward homophobes and other people
>> haters and hope they live out their lifestyle without trying to push
>> the agenda too far, especially around children.
>>
>
> just envious closet homosexuals without the courage to step out.
I think you are onto something here. I learned at an early age to think
opposite. People often mean exactly the opposite of the message they try
to project. They think they are protecting themselves from suspicion. But
they overdo it and create suspicion instead.
Justin Cyder
> On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 05:52:09 -0800 (PST), John <jvang...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> y
>
>
>
>
>
> I often look at people who do protest too much and wonder if they are
> just envious closet homosexuals without the courage to step out.
Listen ye dried up old twat, that crap about the "people who do
protest too much" because they might really want their arseholes
reamed by "Big Dick" or their pussies eaten by a woman with a short/
back and side haircut and wearing male clothes ais so much shite.
Tell me did the people who protested the ww2 death camps
really,instead,wanted to help the germans throw a few jews on the
barby.
Brian Smith
>
> No it isn't. Guess you never studied sociology
According to the dictionary; Conforming with or constituting a norm or
standard or level or type or social norm; not abnormal
So you can see that *norm* and *normal* are the same thing.
Jack
Not me..just have a gander at a gay "pride" parade...
Jack
>>>> agree...you've confirmed it. Thanks
>>>
>>> Leftie? Nah ....just a person who likes having the freedom to live my
>>> life the way I want and thinks everyone should have that right without
>>> exception and without ridicule. If something a person does is not my
>>> style, I prefer to just move on.
>>>
>> So you are ok with polygamy ?? Bestiality ? Child porn ?? Those can
>> be argued as lifestyles as well.
>>
>> If you don't stand for something, you stand for nothing.
>>
>
>
> when arguing against gay rights? It's as if you think it's a
> perversion. Oh, wait a minute, you do! When two consenting adults
> wish to have a relationship that gives them pleasure and/or enriches
> their lives, who are you or I to interfere? Not the same as boinking
> your dog or abusing children. No one is hurt.
You. like many with the 'agenda" love to resort to name calling ?? Did
I call them fags? fudge-packers? dykes? etc? No...so why do "you guys" ??
James Warren
I haven't seen one in person, but judging from what I have seen on television,
I would be good for a laugh at least. They do seem to be having fun don't they?
--
jw (a.k.a. Nagilum)
Jack
I might not agree with your delivery, but your argument is spot-on.
Jack
James Warren
More appropriately, its what *they* call a good time. Its no sweat off
my balls. How about you?
--
jw (a.k.a. Nagilum)
John
Why does the sexuality of others make you so uncomfortable? Your
delicate sense of decorum and propriety comes across as the moral
stand of a prudish church person.
Brian Smith
>
> You. like many with the 'agenda" love to resort to name calling ?? Did I
> call them fags? fudge-packers? dykes? etc? No...so why do "you guys" ??
Why do gay supporters call people who don't like the gay lifestyle,
immediately call them "homophobes"?
Rob
> I might not agree with your delivery, but your argument is spot-on.
I think Dan makes posts like this exact one on purpose, to get results
just like what is happening here. He comes in here, stirs the pot, and
leaves just as quick. He obviously doesn't want to discuss his over
night camping trip even though he took the time to make the original post.
Rick Walker
"Rob" wrote:
>
> I think Dan makes posts like this exact one on purpose, to get results
> just like what is happening here. He comes in here, stirs the pot, and
> leaves just as quick. He obviously doesn't want to discuss his over night
> camping trip even though he took the time to make the original post.
>
I liked some of his photos... nice sunsets, the "Winnie"... my slant on
things is that it's his lifestyle, not mine, so whatever floats your
"Winnie" I guess. :)
John
I don't see it that way at all. He posted a picture of the camper and
one photo in the series had friends in it. Then he followed up with a
technical detail about the furnace. Dan posts about his hobbies and
projects on a regular basis. Sewing machines, apple cider, cooking,
the birth of Internet in Halifax, and so on. It seems perfectly
reasonable that he would refrain from discussing comments like "I'm
gonna puke" and the other hateful things people sometimes post as
personal attacks. I don't see how posting a link to a photo of his
camper is stirring up any pots.
John
I don't know if you're referring to me, but I pipe up anyway, not as a
"gay supporter" whatever that is. I speak up when people use hateful
language about someone like Dan who I know to be a really good,
intelligent, and community minded individual. It has nothing to do
with his sexual orientation. I just don't care all that much about it.
It's not important to me and I really don't understand why some folks
get so worked up about it and take the time to lash out at him. It's
bizarre and pointless.
John
Right on Rick. That's the stuff!
Rick Walker
"John" wrote:
Right on Rick. That's the stuff!
-------------------
Both my wife and I have had the pleasure of meeting Dan in person... he's an
intelligent, likeable fellow. People's sexual orientation is their business
not mine, so I try to judge people on merit.
Rob
> Both my wife and I have had the pleasure of meeting Dan in person...
> he's an intelligent, likeable fellow.
Rick, I didn't mean to imply that Dan wasn't an intelligent, likeable
fellow if you and your wife ever had the pleasure of meeting him in
person. I apologize for any confuse that my observation may have cause
in that respect. He does indeed come off as being an intelligent,
likeable fellow.
It just seems odd that it always turn out this way. Queers, queer
bashing, queers, queer bashing, it's the same thread with a different
subject line. There must be something to it, maybe it really is
"people's sexual orientation?"
People's sexual orientation is
> their business not mine, so I try to judge people on merit.
People's sexual orientation is largely over rated, I'm trying to learn
this over the years. I used to be what they are quick to label as
"homophobic" as in I didn't believe to was right or natural, but then I
thought to myself that love was natural.
Rob
> I liked some of his photos... nice sunsets, the "Winnie"... my slant on
> things is that it's his lifestyle, not mine, so whatever floats your
> "Winnie" I guess. :)
Actually I like his photos very much. Lifestyle? Yeah, that too.
Rick Walker
"Rob" wrote:
>
> Rick, I didn't mean to imply that Dan wasn't an intelligent, likeable
> fellow if you and your wife ever had the pleasure of meeting him in
> person. I apologize for any confuse that my observation may have cause in
> that respect. He does indeed come off as being an intelligent, likeable
> fellow.
>
I'm sure none of this fazes Dan either - he's been here on Usenet for a
while, and I don't recall him ever responding to a mean thing ever said
about him. That takes strength of character, and an ability to rise above
the pettiness.
>
> People's sexual orientation is largely over rated, I'm trying to learn
> this over the years. I used to be what they are quick to label as
> "homophobic" as in I didn't believe to was right or natural, but then I
> thought to myself that love was natural.
>
Love is natural, no matter what kind of package it comes in. I just happen
to be attracted to the opposite sex, that's all. :-)
Rob
> I'm sure none of this fazes Dan either - he's been here on Usenet for a
> while, and I don't recall him ever responding to a mean thing ever said
> about him. That takes strength of character, and an ability to rise
> above the pettiness.
Really though, how big of an accomplishment is rising above pettiness,
particularly on Usenet? Alright, RJNS excluded.
> Love is natural, no matter what kind of package it comes in. I just
> happen to be attracted to the opposite sex, that's all. :-)
Pervert!
James Warren
Its the sensible thing to do Rick.
Daniel MacKay
lol, uh-oh, someone struck a nerve :-)
--
Daniel MacKay
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Daniel MacKay
It comes from basic dog training (which also works for guys) - a dog
would rather be rewarded than punished, but it would rather be punished
than ignored.
James Warren
> On Wed, 06 Jan 2010 22:49:13 -0400, James Warren
> <jwwar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>> Not me..just have a gander at a gay "pride" parade...
>>
>> I haven't seen one in person, but judging from what I have seen on television,
>> I would be good for a laugh at least. They do seem to be having fun don't they?
>
>
> in a very different time and I think their aim was somewhat different
> but not they're more celebration of the freedom of the GLBT community
> to be themselves.
>
Yay Sister. To each his own.
jimmy
>On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 12:19:46 -0400, Donna Whitman
><NSBoo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 06 Jan 2010 22:47:25 -0400, Jack <bigc...@yahoo.com.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>> So you are ok with polygamy ?? Bestiality ? Child porn ?? Those can
>>>>> be argued as lifestyles as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you don't stand for something, you stand for nothing.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Why do homophobes always bring up bestiality, child porn and polygamy
>>>> when arguing against gay rights? It's as if you think it's a
>>>> perversion. Oh, wait a minute, you do! When two consenting adults
>>>> wish to have a relationship that gives them pleasure and/or enriches
>>>> their lives, who are you or I to interfere? Not the same as boinking
>>>> your dog or abusing children. No one is hurt.
>>>
>>>You. like many with the 'agenda" love to resort to name calling ?? Did
>>>I call them fags? fudge-packers? dykes? etc? No...so why do "you guys" ??
>>
>>
>>
>>????? You're the one who brought up bestiality and kiddie porn. The
>>only "name" I used is homophobe and someone who can come up with the
>>language that you just did definitely can't deny it.
>
>I think we should get a room and set up Jack with Justin Cyder, they
>sound like a pair made in heaven :)
Justin side Jack has a nice "ring" to it.
Jack
That "you" John...you might not care about your country, home, society,
etc..some of us do. You are entitled to your opinion...as are the rest
of us.
Jack
> On Thu, 7 Jan 2010 04:10:11 -0800 (PST), John <jvan...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>>> Why do gay supporters call people who don't like the gay lifestyle,
>>> immediately call them "homophobes"?
>> I don't know if you're referring to me, but I pipe up anyway, not as a
>> "gay supporter" whatever that is. I speak up when people use hateful
>> language about someone like Dan who I know to be a really good,
>> intelligent, and community minded individual. It has nothing to do
>> with his sexual orientation. I just don't care all that much about it.
>> It's not important to me and I really don't understand why some folks
>> get so worked up about it and take the time to lash out at him. It's
>> bizarre and pointless.
>
>
> human rights supporter. Anything I can do as a Canadian citizen should
> be available to any other Canadian citizen. Pretty simple to me. I
> just wish people didn't try to deny others equal rights by waving the
> bible around.
What bible...? I am frickin atheist..always have been..at least since
I was 6 years old...
Jack
> a lifestyle, it's a life" It's no more a lifestyle than your own
> identity as a straight man is.
>
In you opinion..and of those in concert with the agenda..It used to be
called "the big lie"
Jack
> On Wed, 06 Jan 2010 22:47:25 -0400, Jack <bigc...@yahoo.com.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>>>> So you are ok with polygamy ?? Bestiality ? Child porn ?? Those can
>>>> be argued as lifestyles as well.
>>>>
>>>> If you don't stand for something, you stand for nothing.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Why do homophobes always bring up bestiality, child porn and polygamy
>>> when arguing against gay rights? It's as if you think it's a
>>> perversion. Oh, wait a minute, you do! When two consenting adults
>>> wish to have a relationship that gives them pleasure and/or enriches
>>> their lives, who are you or I to interfere? Not the same as boinking
>>> your dog or abusing children. No one is hurt.
>> I call them fags? fudge-packers? dykes? etc? No...so why do "you guys" ??
>
>
>
> only "name" I used is homophobe and someone who can come up with the
> language that you just did definitely can't deny it.
so, you can give it but can't take it ?? typical
Jack
> sound like a pair made in heaven :)
If "Justin" is a hot chick...go for it..make sure its a nice room tho..
Jack
>
> Why does the sexuality of others make you so uncomfortable? Your
> delicate sense of decorum and propriety comes across as the moral
> stand of a prudish church person.
Hardly
Wayne Hines
> Not sure if I'd want to stay in a camper in the middle of a snowstorm
> but then I do prefer the creature comforts. In the summer, it would be
> a lovely place to stay though when you look at the photos that Dan's
> taken there.
Wuss! You'd be surprised at how warm and cozy a camper or small camp can
be in "the middle of a snowstorm".
gwh