job for 6M. I didn't want to > include support for 6M because it complicates and adds expense to the > frontend to switch RX filters and could introduce more noise. Instead

com/ji1udd/Hermes-Lite/tree/6M The requirements. as I see it, for the transverter interface are : Better support for current 28 MHz IF transverters Support for custom IF frequencies

com/ji1udd/Hermes-Lite/tree/6M >> >> 73 Matthew M5EVT. >> >> On Tuesday, 21 September 2021 at 17:31:32 UTC+1 Bill Cox AK3Q wrote: >> >>>

com/ji1udd/Hermes-Lite/tree/6M > > Cheers > > Reid > Gi8TME/Mi0BOT > > On 31/08/2021 15:12, John Harper wrote: > > > Hello all - Can someone tell me

>Hi Duncan, > >Have you seen https://github.com/ji1udd/Hermes-Lite/tree/6M I hadn't seen that. Thanks for the link.Very interesting. Duncan -- Duncan Clark G4ELJ

.com/ji1udd/Hermes-Lite/tree/6M https://github.com/ji1udd/Hermes-Lite2/tree/CompactTRX https://github.com/ji1udd/Hermes-Lite2/tree/CTRX_HL2b5 73, Taka, ji1udd

2m or 6m transverter interface > but I don't have the detail plan now. I'm thinking vaguely that it can > be realized by low power output from RF1 and local frequency from

: > > Hi Steve and all, > > I released the materials of my Hermes-Lite enhancement(6M and Keyer) on my > git, 6M branch. > Here ! > > 73 Takashi, JI1UDD > >

git , 6M branch, in RTL folder. I generated jic files for CVA9 and SDK. But, SDK jic file hasn't been verified yet. Because I have CVA9 only. In SDK case, if Pre-V2 AMP and FWD/REV sense

for my 6m signal. It was 13 kHz higher then expected, but I could not hear the CW tone, but it was on the waterfall. 50.125.8 seen at 50.138. Josh On Sat, Mar 5, 2016, 11:50 PM Takashi K wrote